Pavilion Mansion Demolition

In case you hadn't heard (and do care), the older mansion part of the Pavilion at Church and Prospect appears to be on its way to demolition.  It's sad to see such a prominent structure lost but all in the name of progress I guess.  The recent HPC meeting didn't go so well for the owners in terms of PR but I suspect they'll still get their way.  It's interesting that they cite their lack of maintenance and their use of a residential location for a health facility as primary reasons the structure needs to go.  The planned replacement sounds like it will be totally out of character with the rest of the neighborhood.  On the one hand, I recognize their ownership of the property should give them freedom to do with it as they see fit and others should have to buy them out if they want control over it.  On the other hand, I recognize that choosing to be in a community means accepting the responsibility to get along with your neighbors and that zoning and historic preservation laws exist to protect neighboring property owners from blight and reduced value.

What do you think?  Good riddance?  Sad to see but oh well?  Let's do something to stop this?  Who cares?

Forums (1):Discussion Forum

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Charles Chapin wrote on November 15, 2010 at 5:11 pm

The old Pavilion --- the

The old Pavilion --- the Harris mansion -- is among THE most historic structures in Champaign-Urbana. Period. Its demolition is a tragedy. Even cobbled on as it is now, it is a beautiful building full of marvelous history, including one of the most daring crimes in C-U history.

Oliver wrote on November 06, 2010 at 1:11 pm

On the subject of

On the subject of preservation, the reality is that it always comes down to $$ and priorities. I'm happy when an historic structure of some sort is able to be saved & maintained, but I personally would not be able (or perhaps willing) to sacrifice for it. (eating is a somewhat higher priority)

As for "I recognize their ownership of the property should give them freedom to do with it as they see fit" I say only half-facetiously that with all the ordinances we pay our local governments 24/7 to come up with, they sure DO come up with them. I'm not sure there's much freedom to do ANYthing with our property---at least legally! (do we all get a city permit everytime we pound a nail to repair, say, a shingle?)

So, ideal sentiments aside, I generally have to admit to "sad to see-but, oh well..."