Airport Nudie Scans, Yea or Nay or What?

There are so many ways to frame the overall topic, I won't even try.

I'm sorry, not for myself, though, that such shades of "1984" in terms of invasion of privacy (modesty) has had to come to pass for the safety of air passengers.

What is some of your take on the subject, please?

Forums (1):Discussion Forum

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

bluegrass wrote on November 23, 2010 at 4:11 pm

Okay, I'm going to agree with

Okay, I'm going to agree with William_D and buzorro here. I can't believe I just wrote that.

I didn't really think about it until I realized the next time I fly with my 8 year old there is a possibility that the kid would have to go through an enhanced pat down, at which time I would blow a gasket.

This business of taking the entire population and telling them they must submit is outrageous. Yes, I want flying to be safe, but stop shaking down everyone. I know this will likely draw some criticism, but it is not my 64 year old father, or my 8 year old, or me or anyone I know or associate with who is attempting to blow up commercial airplanes. It is a select group of people, who share a similar demographic, and a similar set of religious views. I remember watching a mother with a baby, a toddler, and a kid maybe 10 getting shaken down. She was in tears, the baby was crying, the toddler was climbing on the table. I felt horrible for her. Why waste your time on a soccer mom from Skokie going to see Grandma in Florida?

And for these officials to tell us that we just don't have to fly?!! This is government out of control.

Oliver wrote on November 23, 2010 at 6:11 pm

My father, departed since

My father, departed since '89, was a "Mr. Rogers" sort of gentleman. He ended his working years in electronic repair and always carried a miniature small tool assortment in his white shirt pocket, which, of course, set off the metal detector in O'Hare.....No, he was not your typical hi-jacker stereotype.

As for the across-the-board inspection that bluegrass thinks is outrageous, that's the way I feel about it, too, but then again, the word "profiling", especially "racial profiling" is such a taboo to even hint at in 2010, that I've not heard much talk about it along with this topic. (I realize bluegrass did not use the word "profile" but the phrase "group of select people" is somewhat suggestive of that idea. If anyone wants to get into that topic, please post a question/comment.)

thechampaignlife wrote on November 26, 2010 at 9:11 am

There are the Timothy

There are the Timothy McVeigh's and female/child suicide bombers of the world too so I can't see any clear way to make a distinction. If someone has a specific proposal for security from even a majority of threats with minimal invasiveness, I'd love to hear it. I think the long term solutions are going to involve reducing the motivation of would-be terrorists. Providing more mental services and engaging in more dialogue and cooperation internationally would be a good start. Promotion of education and "adopt a country" programs would be good too. If companies got tax incentives to hire works from the adopted country, it would give the people of those countries gainful employment which would improve their situation and make them less likely to fall into violent behavior. If we're going to outsource anyway, might as well do it productively and not just all to China and India.

freechampaign wrote on November 18, 2010 at 11:11 pm

If you read real close, I did

If you read real close, I did not call you "stupid". I only stated that your response was "stupid". There is a difference. Not knowing you, I would not call you stupid.

buzorro wrote on November 18, 2010 at 6:11 am

Yeah,....let's imagine that,

Yeah,....let's imagine that, oh...I dunno...that pigs can fly.

I mean, as long as we're imagining...

Oliver wrote on November 18, 2010 at 11:11 am

Interesting discussion. I'm

Interesting discussion. I'm still torn. On one hand I really can't counter the following reply on FBk to the subject: " The solution is Dont fly if you dont want to go thru their security. I for one want to be safe!!! 2 hours ago · LikeUnlike."
So, those of us who see a disturbing 'shade of gray' in this issue that many don't see--or simply dismiss by saying to "get over it" don't seem to be presenting our views effectively. If the issue pertained to, say, entering the Library of Congress, perhaps our fears would have more "traction".

buzorro wrote on November 19, 2010 at 5:11 pm

Those who desire liberty and

Those who desire liberty and security deserve neither. - Ben Franklin

Check it out, Oliver. This subject is going viral. That Judge on FOXEntertainment/News is saying that if this persists, then we are, for all practical purposes, slaves.

Look on one of the most popular websites in the world, drudgereport.com, and you'll see links to dozens of articles from various sources covering this topic.

Why is the US and Israel the only countries pushing this?

The terrorists have won.

Oliver wrote on November 20, 2010 at 12:11 am

Remember, I am not totally

Remember, I am not totally "agin" either side of this. I agree that someone somewhere is laughing at what they've reaped, just as Osama was so pleased at seeing the Twin Towers come down exceeding his expectations, apparently.

I don't know that an entire war has been won by terrorists since life here on old Harvey St. is much the same to date. I do fear, though, that incidents like 9-11 could happen again.....

Those who desire liberty and security deserve neither. - Ben Franklin

I've actually put some thought into the Franklin quote. I am imagining he could've used it to say that for the U.S. to attain independence, it would come at the cost of losing the security that the mother country had been providing....(?)

Using the quote in regards to this "flying more safely at the cost of personal freedom" it would seem to be saying in one sense that it would be better to take the risk of flying where the plastic explosives were less likely to be discovered than to give in to these personal body invasions....(?)

That's where I'll leave it at this moment.

freechampaign wrote on November 18, 2010 at 11:11 am

What a stupid response.

What a stupid response. People have been able to get explosives on planes and you want to say something as stupid as "pigs can fly". I say if you do not want to follow the guidelines to be able to fly then walk!

buzorro wrote on November 18, 2010 at 5:11 pm

Stupid is as stupid

Stupid is as stupid does...Name-calling? How mature...

Personally I think it's obscene to grope three-year olds, nuns, etc. (Yes, this occurs)

I think it's obscene giving airline passengers a choice between being given a dose of radiation or being fondled. You don't think the eeeeevil terrrorists aren't laughing at us?

Follow the money...who's selling these machines? Dual-citizen Israeli Michael Chertoff...

'They came first for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Etc., etc., ad nauseum...'

Suppose a terrrorist planted an explosive in his wife's breast implant? Hahaha, the possibilities are endless. If you live in fear, go ahead and let your teenage daughter, wife or mother give free nudie pics to the TSA thugs. They keep records of the good ones, ya know?

You know, if a terrorist truly wanted to cause mass murder and mayhem, he wouldn't have to board a plane, just blow up a terminal where lines of sheeple are waiting to be X-rayed or groped.

What, me fly? Nahhh....

Oliver wrote on November 18, 2010 at 11:11 pm

Sorry to sense a bit of

Sorry to sense a bit of testiness here. Any direct or implied "name-calling" adds nothing good to any honest discussion, esp. in dealing with a controversial issue.

I remain caught in a shade of gray between the black and white sides. What I haven't heard yet is what the anti-scan/probe side has better to offer for *flying safely* than the so-called "sheeple" side.

I'd say the worst weapon ever invented is a human intent on sacrificing his/her own life to perform violent acts. It is very hard to defend against that.

Regards,

Strange1 wrote on November 17, 2010 at 11:11 pm

Nice to see all these..."it

Nice to see all these..."it can't happen to me' responses. Lets say your wife (husband/mother/child) was on a plane and someone brought it down because they were able to get aboard with hidden explosives, You'd be screaming your head about why wasn't people screened better...blah, blah, blah. Well, I don't care about my privacy if it means that some little kid or some grandmother's life is spared because of someones 'privacy'. Check me anywhere, anyway (as long as it doesn't hurt too bad). The world went thru this when we had to have social security numbers and driver licenses and register for the draft etc etc etc... Get over it.

William_D wrote on November 16, 2010 at 5:11 pm

Not just "Nay" but "HECK

Not just "Nay" but "HECK NAY!" Not only are full body scans an invasion of privacy, but so is just about every other hurdle at an airport (no, that wasn't an OJ reference). We're a nation of bedwetters if we let a bunch of overpaid security guards want to take away our shampoo, shaving gel, etc. One guy halfway around the world tries to blow the heels off his Hush Puppies and the rest of us spend our remaining days of air travel standing in line with our shoes off.

What about that guy who tried to kill a Saudi prince with an explosive device shoved up his...well, you know. I'm surprised we're not submitting to cavity searches because of that guy.

Traveling is a pain because our government over-reacts and our media is a bunch of sensationalistic dullards.

Oliver wrote on November 17, 2010 at 1:11 am

Simply put, I'm torn on this

Simply put, I'm torn on this subject where I can only shake my head in dismay......

thechampaignlife wrote on November 17, 2010 at 3:11 pm

I personally don't have a

I personally don't have a problem with it for myself but I understand others who might. I figure at the point where they're seeing thousands of naked people each day, they're desensitized to nudity similarly to a doctor. I could see having a quick moving line for these scanners and a standard line for those who object.

I agree with William_D that it does seem over-reactionary that one person or event results in so much effort but, then again, I drive everywhere I travel within the U.S. at this point because flying is just too much work and too much money for the benefit. I'd prefer to take the train but it is also expensive and doesn't go everywhere. I also think train security would increase dramatically if it became as popular as some hope, negating many of the benefits to train travel.

sberanek wrote on November 16, 2010 at 4:11 pm

I really don't have strong

I really don't have strong feelings one way or the other. however, I would like to know if, when going through these things, the people watching the scans are going to be able to tell the difference between my titanium hip pin and my steel shoulder from a concealed whatever. Is it going to take me 4 hours to explain to them that I have metal parts?