Urbana funding of "permenant support housing" with "low demand" criteria.

Please ask the Mayor to have the Urbana Community Development Commision's December 21st meeting regarding Urbana funding of "permenant support housing" with "low demand" criteria continually rebroadcast. This commision needs to open up talks further before any funding reccomendation.

Help for disabled, or families is a growing need.  How it is approached is important.  There are those that would support building shelters or apartments, services, with little requirement to particpate or leave.  That sounds like a BIG TAX HIKE for those trying to pay the mortgage for the long term.

What can we do to help our neighbors? Ask all hospitals operating as non-profits, refusing to pay property tax indefinately, to provide services other than emergency room to the homeless population.  They can do this at cost with little goverment regulation. Services such as addition treatment. They are currently legaly compelled to treat those in the ER at great cost to us all. Prevention lowers costs.

We can ask the Parkland College Board whose taxing district we are in, to provide free life skills and job training to those in shelters and such circumstance to all qualified that ask on constant basis.

We can ask that apartments owners with vacancies be given some incentive to rent on a temporary basis to address overflow from those who meet the strict criteria of the Women's Fund shelter or the Salvation Army.

Talking about big buildings, services just leaves others indefinately on the waiting list, and others with a tax bill that might put them in on a waiting list.

Andrea Antulov

 

 

Forums (1):Discussion Forum

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Oliver wrote on December 26, 2010 at 12:12 pm

The homeless issue is very

The homeless issue is very complicated and very unresolved to me. In this country it ought to be a top issue instead of an "out of sight, out of mind" one.

I remember TV ads (UNICEF?) saying that even small donations could be used to feed/cloth orphans overseas for pennies a day. I'm sorry for the world's plight, but as many have said, we need to take care of our own citizens first with our resources.

As for churches, just because one does not find any info on what charity work a church does, that does not mean it does none, obviously.

Regards,

aantulov wrote on December 26, 2010 at 4:12 am

And one more thing about this

And one more thing about this meeting of note. A member of this council suggested with enthusiasm that any home left vacant for more that 3 months be seized by the city to house homeless people. This person has no further business on a council appointed by the mayor.
Considering the amount of people unable to rent or sell barely making there morgage this idea if left unchallenged could have a pronounced affect on families losing assets.

And if one were to challenge the community at large for answers to the homeless crisis, one might look to the three huge churches on Race, Philo and Lincoln that do not pay into the tax base but take up large amounts of prime business property.
Exactly what good deeds defining a church do these churches do for the residents of Urbana of a charitable nature? I see no immediate sign on their websites or lobbies. If a church of such large funds does not help the community it sits with keeping families homeless together, or other such worthy and needed services, why should it be legaly be defined a tax free status?
Andrea Antulov

selguy wrote on December 26, 2010 at 1:12 pm

Which Council member made the

Which Council member made the suggestion about seizing houses vacant for more than 3 months?