Eviction process begins at Cherry Orchard

Champaign-Urbana Public Health District officials, accompanied by sheriff's deputies, went door to door at a rural apartment complex Friday afternoon to inform tenants that they had until Saturday morning to vacate the premises.

Julie Pryde, public health administrator, said many tenants at Cherry Orchard Village apartment complex were not at home, and some did not open their doors.

She said health officials and sheriff's deputies would return Friday evening to inform the remaining tenants that they must leave.

The power to evict was the result of a temporary restraining order approved Thursday by Champaign County Judge John Kennedy.

Pryde said it "will be up to the sheriff's office" to determine what to do if tenants didn't open their doors when they returned. She said 10 of the 17 apartments at the "Jones Building" — the easternmost building at the site — are occupied.

"I don't know if there are one or 10 people living" in each apartment, Pryde said.

Translators assisted at the scene, and Pryde said all of the tenants understood what was happening.

Kennedy granted the temporary restraining order on Thursday following a nearly four-hour hearing.

Kennedy also ordered apartment managers Bernard and Eduardo Ramos jailed. He also amended two arrest warrants issued in May for the Ramoses — on civil and criminal contempt of court — after they failed to show up for a hearing.

Now, if the Ramoses are arrested, they will remain incarcerated until the sewage problems at Cherry Orchard are fixed, either through the vacating of the property or repairing the sewer system. Previously, Kennedy had ordered that the two had to post the full amount of bond on each warrant — $20,000 apiece — to be released.

In April, the Ramoses were ordered to close down the apartment complex until sewage problems were remedied. They were also fined more than $54,000 because of unlawful discharge of sewage, unlawful rental of noncompliant property, failure to obtain a construction permit and unlawful repair or alteration of a sewer system.

The judgment came as a result of a civil case filed by the health district.

Health officials testified of seeing raw sewage on top of the ground around the property, and in some cases children running through the effluent.

The temporary restraining order remains in effect until July 17. The court will meet again on the case July 15.

At the site Friday, Jim Roberts, director of environmental health for the health district, showed a photo of Bernard Ramos to those assembled.

"If you see him, I'm sure the sheriff's deputies would be interested," Roberts said.

Before venturing onto the site, health officials and sheriff's deputies took steps to maintain safety.

"There is fecal contamination on the property," Pryde said. "The north and south ends are where the septic systems are not working."

She also warned of electrical cords that were running across part of the property.

Cords were seen near Multi-Flo aerators south of the apartment building. Pryde said because the septic system is not working, someone had placed sump pumps in the aerators to pump out effluent.

Those entering the property wore gloves and were warned not to put their hands near their face.

Most, if not all, of those living at Cherry Orchard are migrants working on detasseling crews. Pryde said she has been told that more migrants are on the way.

Signs were to be placed at the site Friday afternoon, informing that the complex had been shut down.

It had not been determined where the tenants would stay. Pryde said all motels in Rantoul were full due to the I&I farm show in Penfield, and no housing complexes were willing to take anyone. She said officials with the former Chanute hospital, which houses migrant workers, said the property is full. Pryde said the former hospital is licensed to house 450 people.

Pryde said tenants would most likely stay in Thomasboro or Champaign-Urbana.

It is the second time that public health officials, assisted by several social service agencies, have had to find housing for Cherry Orchard tenants. One family for whom a new home had been found in Rantoul in February moved back to Cherry Orchard, Pryde said.

She said the family was told by someone at Cherry Orchard that all the problems at the complex had been resolved.

Some tenants had complained about power and water being shut off indiscriminately, even during the winter.

Pryde said Illinois Migrant Council officials from Peoria were headed to Cherry Orchard to assist with the relocation of the tenants. Also assisting have been the Salvation Army, United Way and Community Service Center, Rantoul.

The process of closing down Cherry Orchard has been a long one. The health district's initial complaint was filed in 2007.

"This is really a ... waste of government and community resources," Pryde said of having to evict the tenants when the Ramoses had been ordered to shut down Cherry Orchard earlier this year.

"We hope this is going to be the end of it."

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Yatiri wrote on July 09, 2011 at 6:07 am

This won't be the end of it.

Poor people need affordable housing. There will be more poor people.

There will always be landlords like the Ramos, they were just the extreme.

No, this won't be the end of it.

sameeker wrote on July 09, 2011 at 11:07 am

What is it about that culture that makes them think that teh laws of the United States do not apply to them?

Los Ramos son Malos wrote on July 09, 2011 at 11:07 pm

Bernard and Eduardo Ramos screwed me and my family over by renting us a place that should have never been rented out at all! While these guys may seem extreme, they're callous disregard for tenants, the law, and the public have exposed three things that need to be corrected as soon as possible: (a) the land owner rental laws are far too lax in Illinois and Champaign County, (b) the way these laws are enforced by the police agencies, health departments, and particularly the building code agencies (Neighborhood Services in Champaign and Urbana, etc.) involved, operating under a policy of "work with the land owners and you will get more things done," while understandable and, up to this point, practicable, when put in context of land owners and managers like the Ramoses (and trust me, there are many more like them in this area, my wife and I have unfortunately become acquainted with a few of them personally), becomes overly-credulous to the point of gullibility, (c) tenants need many more rights than those they can manage to wrestle and haggle onto a lease from a land owner. In short, these guys, while their ethics are contemptible to the point of easily being comparable to the toxic sludge that is leaching out of their precious complex, have exposed some vital problems in our local tenant laws and the way that the agencies who enforce these laws do business. I hope the message is crystal clear at this point: THINGS NEED TO CHANGE SOON OR YOU CAN EXPECT MORE OF THE SAME IN THE FUTURE!!! (Sorry for the caps an bangs, but I swear some of the people who write our tenant laws and enforce them in this area seem like they are hard of hearing, or perhaps just hard-headed.)

Yatiri wrote on July 10, 2011 at 9:07 pm

I've lived in the area off and on since 1954.

In the 70's the evil landlord was a guy named Tirona I think. The CU Tenants Union was founded partly in response to.

There will always be evil landlords.

If everyone had their own home it would be best.

Los Ramos son Malos wrote on July 10, 2011 at 11:07 pm

Ironically, we have attempted to buy our own house a few times, however, the problem was never whether or not we could actually afford a particular mortgage payment, but it was our credit (almost none of which reflects problems with paying rent on time, but it was mostly credit cards and utilities) and also the FHA regulations about what percentage of our income covers the mortgage. Our rents have been anything from 1 1/2 times to twice (and sometimes even more) what any projected payments on a reasonable mortgage would be. I find it interesting that there are no regulations preventing us from renting a place that costs more than half our income, but if we try to buy a house whose mortgage is more than a third of our income and we go through FHA (which with our credit, we have to) we get declined. The biggest irony is that it seems that the FHA has been more of a barrier to us buying our own house than a help toward that goal.

By the way, we rented one of the Ramoses' many locations in Champaign-Urbana and, fortunately, not anything in Cherry Orchard.

News by Date