Faculty blasts UI leaders over anonymous emails

CHICAGO — Faculty senators publicly lambasted university leaders Thursday for a "pattern of inappropriate, secretive and deceptive behavior" that culminated in the now infamous anonymous emails sent by President Michael Hogan's chief of staff.

Don Chambers, a UI-Chicago professor and chair of the University Senates Conference, delivered remarks near the close of the UI trustees' meeting in Chicago Thursday about what he called "one of the worst scandals to ever confront this university."

He said the investigative report on the anonymous emails sent to faculty by Lisa Troyer contains evidence "implicating a wider scope of involvement in the controversy than simply the question of who wrote the anonymous emails themselves."

The report found no evidence that Hogan or anyone else knew about the Dec. 12 emails, which were traced to Troyer's computer. The anonymous emails, signed by "a senator," attempted to persuade Senates Conference members to drop their opposition to Hogan's plan to revamp enrollment management.

Chambers said "leaders must accept responsibility for what happens on their watch even if they may not have personally directed or approved it."

And he said other "secret communications" uncovered during the investigation were "unbelievably mean-spirited and nasty."

Investigators found that Troyer had drafted, but didn't send, anonymous "test" emails to faculty and administrators who spoke against the enrollment management plan at a campus senate meeting earlier in December. She was on the phone with Hogan at the time, the report said.

"This pattern of sleazy conduct, now on open display, is as damaging to the university as the production of the infamous emails themselves," Chambers said.

Chambers said he was speaking on behalf of the leadership of the Urbana and Chicago campus senates, as well as the Senates Conference. He did not mention the Springfield campus senate, even though two representatives were there, including Professor Tih-Fen Ting, who investigators found had sent Troyer information about internal Senates Conference debates through anonymous emails.

Hogan declined to respond directly to Chambers' comments after the meeting.

"I disagree with what he said, but he has a right to say it," Hogan said. "The investigation speaks for itself."

He again denied having any prior knowledge of the Dec. 12 anonymous emails or the earlier test email. Troyer has denied authoring them and told Hogan and investigators that her computer was hacked.

"I may have been on the phone with whoever was typing, but I didn't hear any typing," Hogan said.

Asked if he has talked to Troyer since the investigation, Hogan said, "I call her from time to time to check up on her. ... I've been a good friend of hers for many years."

Earlier, asked about Hogan's future at the university, board Chairman Christopher Kennedy reiterated his support for the UI president.

"There is no question as to the future of President Hogan," Kennedy said. "The board's got great confidence in him. He acted appropriately throughout the investigation."

Kennedy said Hogan brought in outside counsel to investigate the emails, had the consultants report to someone other than himself and kept the board fully informed throughout.

The investigators "issued a complete report that cleared him of any involvement," Kennedy said. "The board is confident in the process."

He also said the board will not get involved in decisions about Troyer's future.

Troyer still holds a zero-time tenured faculty appointment with the Department of Psychology on the Urbana campus. Her salary, above $200,000 as chief of staff, has yet to be determined.

Kennedy said the board had purview over Troyer's administrative position, as she reported directly to the president "who reported to us."

But as a faculty member, her reporting line would go through a department head, dean, provost and chancellor first, he said.

"We don't want to get involved in something six levels deep into the university," he said.

Troyer did not attend Thursday's meeting.

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

asparagus wrote on January 20, 2012 at 12:01 pm

Mr. Kennedy, what is your real motivation for so staunchly defending the corrupt behavior of these officials!?!?  Your actions make little sense at face value.

 

read the DI wrote on January 20, 2012 at 12:01 pm

I'm no kneejerk defender of the status quo, but assuming you are referring to Hogan, what makes you so certain he was in on it?

jms wrote on January 20, 2012 at 1:01 pm

I understood it was because phone records show that he was on the phone while Troyer was setting up the acct she used to email the faculty.

Sid Saltfork wrote on January 20, 2012 at 12:01 pm

@asparagus:  You are right about Kennedy.  Either he has a motive; or he is a bumbling fool.  I applaud the faculty representatives for their actions.   I wish all of the faculty would be vocal over the disgraceful conduct by Dr. Troyer.  Dr. Hogan will do nothing.  Mr. Kennedy will do nothing.  Dr. Troyer will remain with her $200,000.00 salary, and tenure.  Remember only the university president, Dr. Hogan, can recind her tenure.  His choice has been made clear.  He will do nothing so he can "possibly" protect himself.  This scandal has been followed in the media by universities across the country.  It only adds to the reputation of the the State of Illinois.  A state of corruption, scandals, and zero ethics in politics, and academia.   

UIUCHoopFan wrote on January 20, 2012 at 1:01 pm

1. Troyer's tenure is her silence.  To revoke her tenure would open the flood gate of accusations and finger pointing regarding the truth.  In addition, revoking tenure would be admitting it was a wee bit of a mistake letting her tag along to yet another Hogan appointment.

2. Chris Kennedy is a lesser Kennedy.  Otherwise he would have been groomed for the family business of politics instead of placed at the epicenter of retail hell, The Merchandise Mart.

3. The Kennedy's pride themselves on the perfect cover-up: See Chappaquiddick.  The honing of such skills seems to be serving the Board of Trustees well!

The fight is on but there are already black eyes all around.  Just another layer of corruption and carelessness in Illinois.

read the DI wrote on January 20, 2012 at 2:01 pm

Wow, the lengths some people will go to.

You should read up on the history of the "Mart." Kennedy did an enormously good job on that.

As for an event that happened to Chris Kennedy's uncle when Chris was just 6 years old, why would you even bring that up? Unless, of course, you want to be judged for on everything your relatives did.

GeneralPeeved wrote on January 20, 2012 at 2:01 pm

(1) Re: Ms. Troyer - Dear Psych Dept, the community is waiting and watching to see what you recommend....don't muck it up

 

(2) Re: Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Hogan - Do we know whether or not Hogan was Kennedy's hand-picked choice for the position....that would explain a whole lot of the defensive posturing.

 

(3) Re: Professor Ting -  you're toast......you're now, and forever will be, labeled as a rat and rear-smoocher....your credibility and integrity are shot.....you should just move on

Lostinspace wrote on January 20, 2012 at 3:01 pm

It is good to see the faculty aroused from its dogmatic slumber, abruptly aware of the damage being done to the university by bumbling (at best) administrators who have a poor sense of what a university is about.

Nancy Hoag wrote on January 20, 2012 at 4:01 pm

We may never know what really happened.  The quick involvement of lawyers in this investigation limits any FOIA request because documents are stamped "attorney-client" privilege.  Some of these conversations between friends and lawyers may never see the light of day.  In the last scandal, those senior administrators specifically named by the final Admissions Review report for unethical behavior continue their employment with the University of Illinois and earn huge salaries (Gray Book, 2010-11):  B Joseph White - $288,700; Heidi Hurd - $259,331; Larry DeBrock - $340,000; Richard Herman - $200,000


Now we can add Troyer's $200,000 salary.  Would a student at U of I be this fortunate if caught plagiarizing?

bernies wrote on January 20, 2012 at 7:01 pm

Just think it's a bit ironic that most of the commenters who are complaining about the posting of "anonymous" e-mails by Ms. Troyer are using pseudonyms. I'm not commenting on the validity of the allegations in this case. Don't know enough about the case to do so. Just commenting on the irony.

Bernie Sloan

asparagus wrote on January 20, 2012 at 9:01 pm

It's ironic thst Lisa Troyer used a psedodymn herself. So, I cannot comment anonymously but she can do so to with devasting effect without recourse. Great logic!

 

Jam wrote on January 20, 2012 at 8:01 pm

Interesting that all of these people represent the liberal democratic establishment at the UI.  They just cannot get along apparently.  This is indeed a power struggle between the faculty and the Board.

acs wrote on January 20, 2012 at 8:01 pm

I don't see any irony, Bernie.  The issue isn't that Troyer's email was anonymous, it's that she misrepresented herself as a faculty senator.

ClearVision wrote on January 23, 2012 at 2:01 pm

I've heard of maintaining plausible deniability. Hogan, however, has attained the state of implausible deniability.

Sid Saltfork wrote on January 23, 2012 at 7:01 pm

If you heard the local news today, it gets worse.  He is willing to, maybe, compromise with the faculty on the admissions policy.   He said nothing regarding Dr. Troyer.  That will appease the faculty; and allow Dr. Troyer to still retain her $200,000.00 salary, and tenure.  By next week, everyone will forget it except some snubs at the Faculty Center.  It does prove that the Illinois Ethics Law does not apply to academia, and politicians.  Wonder what the Vegas line is for the amount of time before the next University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign scandal occurs?  It would be a good civics, and economy project for grade schoolers.

ClearVision wrote on January 27, 2012 at 10:01 am

I think the ethics laws do apply (and are applied to) academics. It's the administration and politicians who are allowed to get away with flagrant violations and general unethical behavior.

News by Date