Group blasts Champaign excavation; Ameren says work poses no risk

CHAMPAIGN — The health care advocacy group that has made itself a watchdog of the cleanup of the site of a former manufactured gas plant again found fault with the operation on Thursday.

Advocates said open-air excavation was leaving nearby residents at risk to harmful dust and vapors escaping from the ground, while a site supervisor and an Ameren Illinois spokesman said there was no issue and that workers had not detected any chemicals.

Most of the cleanup at the Ameren Illinois-owned site at Fifth and Hill streets, which workers have been excavating for about two years, has occurred underneath a large tent meant to control any dust or vapors escaping while crews dig up contaminated soil. The contaminants were byproducts of a process that turned coal into gas at a plant which was razed decades ago.

Thursday's work at a small area on the south end of the lot, just north of the Center for Women in Transition at 508 E. Church St., was not under the tent.

"Ameren is gambling with the health of the people who live in this neighborhood," said Grant Antoline, an organizer with Champaign County Health Care Consumers.

But Ameren Illinois spokesman Leigh Morris said there was no issue — Thursday's work was approved and supervised by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, and workers carried special detectors to monitor the levels of chemicals in the air.

"The monitors detected nothing that would have been of health and safety concerns," Morris said.

Morris said the open-air work began mid-Thursday morning and was completed by mid-afternoon.

Morris said Ameren Illinois received one complaint when dust started traveling on to a neighbor's property. He said workers watered down the area to eliminate dust, but the dust was not harmful to begin with.

"This is the same dust that could be found in any gravel," Morris said.

The excavation on Thursday was up against a fence at the south end of the property. Site supervisor Jacob Blanton said the fence would have been in the way of the large white tent, which is why workers could not move the tent to shroud the excavation.

Antoline said that is no excuse. The workers were "cutting corners," he said, and Health Care Consumers Director Claudia Lennhoff said there is no reason to believe the soil workers dug up Thursday is any less harmful than what they have been insulating for two years.

"What they're digging up there is the same as what's underneath the tent," she said.

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Joe American wrote on June 09, 2011 at 5:06 pm

"Thursday's work was approved and supervised by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency..."

And all along I thought that the Champaign County Health Care Consumers was here to protect us. It's very clear now that their sole purpose is to perpetuate their own existence.

ultragreen wrote on June 09, 2011 at 11:06 pm

Or perhaps the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency is here to protect Ameren and other corporate interests, rather than us. Ever hear of government corruption?

ronaldo wrote on June 10, 2011 at 11:06 am

And can we assume that the monitors were "rigged" not to pick up any potentially dangerous gasses? May I borrow your tinfoil hat when you're done, please?

Marti Wilkinson wrote on June 10, 2011 at 2:06 am

Actually, concerns were being expressed about the site long before CCHC became involved. Plus, it's not unusual for the EPA to engage in dialogue that is friendly to corporations. There is a lot of history involved with the site, and residents have a right to be concerned.

schmeckendeugler wrote on June 10, 2011 at 9:06 am

I'm on the fence on this one. I trust neither organization.

dw wrote on June 10, 2011 at 9:06 am

Hmm... let's see:

Trust the Illinois government agency under whose watch the original contamination occurred, and continued to let sit for decades, or a watchdog agency who responds forcing a press conference to residents complaints... not exactly a tough choice...

ronaldo wrote on June 10, 2011 at 11:06 am

"The 3.5 acre lot at 5th Street and Hill Street in Champaign is the site of a former manufactured gas plant (FMGP) that operated from 1887 until 1953."

http://www.healthcareconsumers.org/files/5th%20and%20Hill%20Fact%20Sheet...

"The forces working to promote needed progress came together with those committed to protecting environmental resources. The Illinois General Assembly became the first state legislature in the nation to adopt a comprehensive Environmental Protection Act. It was signed into law by Governor Richard Ogilvie and became effective July 1, 1970."

http://www.epa.state.il.us/about/history.html

So are you still sticking by your assertion that the pollution occurred under the watch of the IEPA? Ouch.

skiparoo wrote on June 10, 2011 at 9:06 am

the usepa and the iepa work for the polluters. see champaign case #92 L 831. told the oil dogs to "clean it up immediately." nobody cleaned up anything from prospect & springfield; all the way to john street. the iepa protects the polluters. they were bought off years ago! and the crooked court did nothing, too.

News by Date