Health Alliance expands protest; Humana joins in
URBANA -- Humana has joined Health Alliance Medical Plans in filing protests with the state of Illinois on plans to award new insurance contracts for state employees and retirees.
Insurance vendors have until noon today to file protests, according to the state's Chief Procurement Officer Matt Brown.
State employees and retirees are set to begin enrolling in new health plans May 1, but whether an evaluation of the protests and a decision from the Executive Ethics Commission will be done in time for final contracts to be awarded before then is hard to tell. The process can take days or weeks, Brown said.
"It is a priority for our office," he added. "However, we won't compromise the review."
Humana, which covers about 15,000 state employee and retiree members under an HMO, filed protests Tuesday on both the state's HMO and open access plan contract awards, company spokeswoman Lindsey Minella said.
Health Alliance, which covers nearly 100,000 state employees and retirees in an HMO plan and initially filed a protest Sunday on HMO proposed contracts, has since also filed a protest of proposed open access contract awards, company spokeswoman Jane Hayes said.
The state has proposed awarding two separate HMO contracts to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois and two open-access plan contracts to HealthLink and PersonalCare a move Health Alliance contends will force its state employee and retiree members to switch to more expensive coverage to keep access to their current doctors.
The Blue Cross and Blue Shield HMOs apparently won't be options for East Central Illinois state employees or retirees because the company doesn't have medical provider networks established in those counties.
Hayes said Health Alliance officials decided to protest the proposed open access contracts in addition to the HMO contracts after learning Monday that the requests for proposals submitted by insurers were scored differently for HMOs and open access plans.
On HMO plans, she said, 70 percent of the state's consideration was pricing and 30 percent of the consideration was quality, provider network and other non-pricing factors.
On open access plans, she said, it was the other way around: Just 28 percent of the consideration was pricing and the rest of the consideration went to quality and other factors.
Yet, Hayes said, the two selected open access plans which are structured with three different service level tiers and out-of-pocket costs for each will include HMOs on their first tiers.
"These are all considered managed care plans, so one would think the evaluation would be the same," she said.
Health Alliance officials say they have looked at costs for their members who would be forced to change to the second tier of an open access plan, and found a family of four with typical health care costs in a year, including one hospital stay, one emergency room visit, nine primary care visits, three lab and X-ray service charges, three preventive health visits and one specialist visit would pay 222 percent more.
For those services, out-of-pocket costs under a Health Alliance HMO would run $730, and under the second tier of an open-access plan, including the higher premium, out-of-pocket costs would run $2,351, according to Health Alliance Chief Financial Officer Gordon Salm.
The largest increase the company found in comparison was 309 percent more for a $10,000 hospital stay under the second tier of an open access plan and up to 135 percent more for an emergency room visit, Salm said.
Hayes said support for insurance contract protests has been growing downstate and talks with legislators are continuing.
"We're talking to them about the fairness of about 137,000 members in downstate HMOs, including Health Alliance, PersonalCare and Humana, that would be forced to change health plans, that would be forced to pay more to keep their doctors," Hayes said. "Nothing changes for Chicago employees. They have the same offerings they had before. So our members are questioning, and so are legislators, why are you treating downstate people differently?"
"News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues." Where is the article from the News-Gazette interviewing state employees to get their opinion on this? I haven't seen one yet. I also don't understand why, if it's true anyway, the state would throw their employee's under the bus by going with a health plan that doesn't have networks in their counties. The governor gives pay raises to high ranking officials within days of taking office and says it was done to retain key employee's. Now he brings in a health plan that may run off low and mid level employees who will seek employment elsewhere becuase of benefits. Maybe top ranking officials do want to sit around empty offices answering their own phones.
Thanks for the comment.
The quote you use pertains to comments on this website. And there has been a healthy discussion of this issue by a number of people, many of them obviously state employees, at
http://www.news-gazette.com/news/politics-and-government/2011-04-06/heal...
and at
http://www.news-gazette.com/news/health/health-care/2011-04-07/health-al...
and at
http://www.news-gazette.com/news/health/health-care/2011-04-11/health-ca...
I imagine there will be more.
Thanks for the suggestion; there may be a separate story to be had out of that for the newspaper. I'll pass it on.
Thanks again,
Mike Howie
online editor
Thanks for the links. Found lots of comments. First, for those people who feel Health Alliance is overpriced. By the State of Illinois' own analysis, in FY11, Health Alliance (HAMP) is a better deal than the other plans that are currently in place and have the highest quality rating. Second, yes there is a very tidy relationship between HAMP and Carle doctors. It is this relationship that has made the care of our chronically ill son since birth (16 years old now and still under medical care) so much easier to cope with. We don't have to defend our doctor's decisions to bean-counters, in some office hundreds of miles away, for tests and procedures because his case doesn't fit the medical books. Getting bounced around between doctors, hospitals, and other medical procedure vendors. We've never had a problem getting referrals to outside specialists and all arranged between our doctors and HAMP, we didn't have to get involved except for getting our referral papers and show up for the appointment. When you have a chronically ill child and try to keep a full time job, then you will understand how this keeps your sanity and marriage in one piece!!!! Our estimate shows that our current out-of-pocket expenses (not including premiums) will almost triple if we have to go to the Quality Care program and that's if our son doesn't have any setbacks. Also, Quality Care costs the State more than Health Alliance. And HAMP takes all the risks and doesn't have to go back to the State for more money if they run out, unlike Quality Care. Yes, it is Economy 101 but you need the right information, numbers, and perspective to properly assess the situation. I also agree about the local community fall-out if these new contracts are approved. Does not bode well for HAMP or Champaign-Urbana, or the University. Times are tough ... but this just doesn't add up and someone in Chicago is going to make a lot of money at the State's expense! Yes Chicago is the center of the universe, the rest of us are just collateral damage.
Why is Quality Care your only option if the state didn't offer HA? Try HealthLink. When I calculate our family's out of pocket expenses, even with Carle (which is a tier II provider for HealthLink) I pay less to Carle than if I had Health Alliance. Your mileage may vary with Carle under HealthLink, but with HealthLink you decide whether you go to Christie, Carle, Provena, or elsewhere, no referrals needed. All the benefits of HMO/PPO and open access plans rolled up into one. And people living in Cook County are not covered by HealthLink so you can't say that they are benefitting from the decision to offer that plan.
So the politicians realized they couldn't openly steal back our benefits, so they had CMS work the numbers in order to end up with cut rate insurance that will cost us a LOT more than simply charging us for insurance AND many if not most will be forced to change providers. I've been going to the same Dr for over 30 years and if nothing changes, I'll have to change. Just when you think you've seen about as low as this state government can go - they one up(down) themselves.
retired
Public employees are spoiled. HA is overpriced and not competitive. The company I work for had a 40%+ increase from HA for one year, .....then the next year they came back with a 28% increases. We moved all employees to United Healthcare, with an open bidding process. Employees see the same Carle doctors, in fact ..we can see any doctor....no referals are needed and access to practically any hospital in Illinois. All this for 20% less than HA. Don't be fooled....another plan does not mean you cannot use Carle doctors. This is a competitie bid process...why push even more costs to the taxpayers for keeping HA?


More






Comments
News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.