Not all health care agencies will charge employees who smoke more for insurance
URBANA — When Carle Foundation Hospital and the former Carle Clinic outlawed smoking on their properties seven years ago, they made it a little more challenging for their employees to smoke at work.
Now, they're making it a little more expensive to be a smoker who works for Carle.
Starting Jan. 1, 2012, Carle hospital and physician group plan to start charging their smoking employees $30 more a month for health insurance than non-smoking employees pay.
That delayed starting date will give smokers six months to take advantage of a free smoking cessation program they're being offered, says Carle Senior Vice President of Human Resources Phil Kubow.
Carle is taking the step for the health of its employees — and to set a good example for patients, Kubow said.
It's also an issue of patient comfort: Smoking has been banned on the Carle campus since September 2004, but smoking employees still go off-campus to smoke at meal and break times and carry a smoke smell back with them, Kubow said.
"A strong smoke odor is not anything a patient wants to smell. It's just not conducive to their recovery," he said. "It's almost impossible to eliminate that odor."
There's also a financial issue at stake. Smokers are not only at risk for more diseases, those diseases add to health care costs. Carle's health plan is self-insured, and that's a $50 million annual expenditure, Kubow said.
Cigarette smoking remains the top cause of preventable disease and death worldwide, responsible for 393,000 annual deaths and over $193 billion in annual costs in the U.S., according to the American Lung Association.
According to the organization's 2004 data, those costs break down as $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, and average out to $4,260 per adult smoker.
How many of Carle's 6,000 employees are smokers, Kubow said, he doesn't know. But the average number of smokers for the local community is around 20 percent of the population.
Points for trying
Several other health care organizations in the area — among them Christie Clinic, Provena United Samaritans Medical Center and Provena Covenant Medical Center — don't plan to impose similar policies on their employees for now.
However, "I think everybody is kind of looking at it," said Christie's Human Resources Director Melodie McCammack.
Christie Clinic still has too many smokers on staff, she said, and "being a health care organization, it's very concerning."
The Provena hospitals in Champaign and Urbana don't charge employees more for health insurance if they smoke, but they do give smokers and others with unhealthy habits incentives in the way of insurance discounts if they make healthy changes.
Jason Whetsel, Provena's system manager of health and wellness, said employees can shave $240 a year off their health premiums if they meet their wellness goals from the previous year.
Smoking employees had a new goal added this year, he said. By Nov. 15, they either have to be tobacco-free or complete tobacco cessation counseling.
"You're either tobacco-free or you tried," Whetsel said.
He knows some employers are taking the more stringent step of charging smoking employees more for health insurance, he said, but there isn't a one-size-fits-all solution.
More than half of Americans approve of charging smokers more for health insurance, according to a Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey late last year.
The survey found 54 percent of adults think people who smoke should pay higher health insurance rates than non-smokers. Among non-smokers, 70 percent think smokers should pay more for their health insurance.
Help quitting
Kubow said Carle plans to ask its employees a simple question — do you smoke or don't you — and trust them on the answer.
Those who say yes and want help quitting will be offered six months worth of free help at Carle's expense through Health Alliance Medical Plan's "I Can Quit" tobacco cessation plan.
This program includes 90 days worth of medications and a year's worth of support and coaching by phone. The medications include antidepressants to block the nicotine high, nicotine replacement patches, gum and lozenges, and Chantix, a drug that blocks the pleasure receptors of the brain from nicotine, according to the company's Disease Management Coordinator Penny Shaw.
The program has a success rate of 28 percent at 12 months, considered to be highly successful, Shaw said. At 24 months, 85 percent of the quitters are still smoke-free, she said.
A health-conscious environment may also help. Champaign-Urbana Public Health District Administrator Julie Pryde said she knows charging higher premiums for smokers is a trend. But that's doesn't seem to be necessary at her workplace.
"We've had a lot of employees who started out here smoking and don't smoke any more," she said. "How many employees do we have here who smoke any more? I think we have two ... if that. But we used to have more and they all quit."
And nobody has an excuse not to exercise at public health headquarters if the weather outside is not so nice. There's a treadmill desk in every department so employees can work on a laptop and work those legs at the same time.
"We do lots of stuff to encourage healthy behaviors," Pryde said.
Carle also encourages healthy behaviors by shaving up to $260 a year off health premiums for employees who meet certain wellness goals, Kubow said. But there are still some employees who smoke.
Response to the higher insurance premiums for smokers has been positive overall, he said, but it's not making everybody happy.
"There are always a handful of employees that are frustrated. They feel that we are intruding into their personal lives," Kubow said.
I think we should charge more for over-eaters, drinkers, sexually active, drinking out of styrofoam cups, talking on cell phones due to brain cancer and people who drive to fast also. Anything to get more money. Any health care facility that promotes chantix isn't worried about employees health, look at the side affects of that medication. I think if I was going to start chantix or smoking, I would rather smoke. I guess they have to justify the premiums some way.
How in the world is this going to work? Is Carle going to require employees to submit to random urine toxicology to detect nicotine in their bodies?
Are Carle security officers going to investigate those suspected of lying about their addiction?
If a person smokes at home, then is dishonest about it, is Carle going to fire them?
What business is it of anybody what one does with one's body in the privacy of their home?
The interesting thing is they make absolutely no distinction between casual tobacco users (note I did not say only smokers) and people who smoke cigarettes or how many they smoke. This shows clearly the nature of the beast. They simply want to ostracize and control their employees regardless of the science behind tobacco use (of all types- i.e. smokeless). Does a cigar on the golf-course count as a "tobacco user?" According to their health forms, yes. Do we believe all docs who do this will fill the form out legally correctly? I seriously doubt they will.
This article also makes one believe this is only about employees. It is not, it is also imposed on the employee's family members (those covered by the employee health plan). Why does this matter? Well, it's a very big difference between a first hand cigarette smoker who smokes multiple packs a day and a spouse who has a cigar on the golf course. [Or other non-smoking related tobacco use- (does this even include e-cigarette use or swedish snuss both of which is shown to be much safer than smoking? - see Sweden's improved health since snuss use began).]
Clearly the hospital is making a blanket statement about their employee's family life. They want to control the household of the employee, and they are imposing this on the employee with the nice fringe-benefit of bringing in more revenue for the hospital. The nature of the simple question: "Do you use tobacco?" Shows they don't understand the science behind tobacco use at all, and are making a blanket statement about "good and bad" in employee household habits.
I'm glad we will be here for only a short time- I'm looking forward to leaving the imposition of the hospital's choices for my own life-style and that of my family. [Even if I smoke a cigar on the golf-course once a season.] I either claim it (and pay them extra cash), or I have to be a liar. Nice little revenue stream, Carle. We'll be leaving you soon.









Comments
News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.