Troyer, UI wrangle over pay

URBANA — Lisa Troyer resigned as chief of staff shortly before midnight on Jan. 3, but she has continued working for University of Illinois President Michael Hogan and wants to be paid for that time.

Since her resignation, Troyer said, she has written a transition plan detailing how certain tasks should be handled, drafted remarks for the president, developed protocols on responding to personnel matters such as requests for promotions and reviewed Hogan's emails in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, among other things, according to documents obtained by The News-Gazette through FOIA requests.

The newly disclosed documents show the former chief of staff growing frustrated with university officials when she was not paid for Jan. 4 to Feb. 6, the transition time between when she resigned and when she accepted a full-time faculty position in psychology on the Urbana campus. The documents also show a reluctance on the Department of Psychology's part to have Troyer being paid "that much money and doing nothing this term," as well as concerns about having Troyer teach undergraduates while the campus conducts a review of her alleged ethical lapses.

According to the university, Troyer was paid $10,361 for her final 13 days as chief of staff, from Dec. 16 to Jan. 3, plus $17,880 for unused vacation days as an administrator, and then $2,221 for eight days as a professor of psychology from Feb. 6 to Feb. 15. Because Troyer has a nine-month faculty appointment, she is not eligible for vacation days, meaning her vacation could not be transferred or carried over, according to university spokesman Tom Hardy. When staff on 12-month appointments move to nine-month appointments, vacation days have to be paid out, he said.

As for the time from Jan. 4 to Feb. 6, Troyer is lobbying the university to pay up. As chief of staff, Troyer earned $200,850. Her salary as a professor is $109,000.

"I resigned my chief of staff duties; I did not resign from the University or even the University Administration," Troyer wrote on Feb. 16 to human resources administrator Maureen Parks.

After Troyer pressed university officials on why she hadn't been paid yet for that transition period, Parks asked Troyer to provide additional information on what she had been doing since she resigned as chief of staff.

"Suffice it to say that tying up loose ends and doing my best to make sure that the president has the transition plan and support he needs to continue to do the great job he's been doing has not been a trivial task," Troyer told Parks in a lengthy Feb. 16 email. "As chief of staff, I regularly put in 70+ hours per week. It is a 24/7/365 job. Preparing for and overseeing the transition is a full-time job in itself," Troyer wrote.

Earlier, Troyer had raised the issue of back pay after Parks had resolved Troyer's questions about a possible lapse in insurance coverage: "If you have any questions or need some higher authority or funding source on this, please contact the president. He and others reporting to his office can verify the work I performed and can also confirm that the expectation that I would be smoothly transitioned to a faculty appointment. ... I expect the pay situation to be resolved in 24-hours. Please get back to me by no later than Wednesday start of business."

'An HR issue'

On Tuesday, Hogan told The News-Gazette he will not be the one making the decision about whether Troyer will be paid for the weeks between her resignation and her faculty appointment.

"I've made it perfectly clear ... she needs to deal directly with our HR people," he said. "It's an HR issue. They are and should be the ones making the decision."

An email from Parks, the executive director of human resources and associate vice president, indicates that she felt Hogan should make that call. On Feb. 15, Parks said, "Lisa is saying that in the interim she continued to work on University of Illinois business. If she was working at the direction of University of Illinois management OR we accepted her work during this time frame, we may be obligated to pay her. Obviously, this could be controversial and could create administrative complexities that would take some time to work through. I have asked her for information regarding the time spent and the type of work performed. I will need you to verify this once she replies and then for you to authorize payment to her."

Hogan later replied, "If she worked perhaps she should be paid for it, but in the end it must be your call not mine."

Asked for clarification, Hardy said Tuesday, "I don't think we've gotten to that point yet. Lisa's request is under review. No determination's been made on it."

Troyer did not respond to requests for an interview.

The transition

When Hogan hired Troyer in 2010, her appointment was 100 percent in university administration, but she also was given a zero percent appointment in psychology. A sociologist by training, Troyer received her Ph.D. from Stanford University. She and Hogan worked together at the University of Connecticut, where he was president, and the University of Iowa.

She submitted her resignation while the UI was investigating two anonymous emails sent to faculty members of the University Senates Conference in mid-December. In her resignation email to Hogan, Troyer said "despite my own convictions, it has become clear to me that I am unable to serve the University of Illinois in my current capacity as well as I have over the last year-and-a-half. Please let me know how I can help to transition the Office to ensure its continued effectiveness."

The anonymous emails, sent on Dec. 12, concerned the senates conference's discussion on enrollment management and changes proposed by Hogan in areas of recruiting students, admissions, financial aid and more.

The investigation, conducted by outside legal and forensic data firms at the direction of the UI ethics office and legal counsel, concluded the emails were composed and sent from Troyer's laptop. There was no evidence of hacking or that the laptop was improperly accessed, investigators found. Troyer has said the investigation was mishandled and she did not send the emails.

In the weeks following her resignation as chief of staff in university administration, Urbana campus administration began negotiating the faculty position. An offer was initially extended to her on Jan. 17, but not accepted by Troyer until Feb. 6.

"Note also that the president and I discussed the possibility of re-assignment within the administration before a faculty appointment was offered. I researched and prepared documentation suggesting some options at his request, although he has not elected to pursue those options at this time," she wrote to Parks.

"The president and others, however, have taken me up on my offer to do all I can to assist with the transition throughout the entire period from 1/3-2/9. In fact, it continues through this day," she wrote to Parks on Feb. 16.

But Hogan told The News-Gazette on Tuesday that he did not offer Troyer a job in university administration and there was no expectation that she would get one.

Asked if he requested Troyer to do any work for him after her resignation, Hogan said she prepared a transition plan.

"She spent a lot of time on the investigation and making herself available to people," he added, and said he also asked her to help him locate documents from time to time. The "big thing" she spent her time on, though, was the investigation, he said.

Department's position

Troyer's using university time "to get the message out about what really happened" was exactly what at least one campus administrator did not want to see happen.

Brian Ross, interim head of the Department of Psychology, met with Troyer on Feb. 8 to discuss her future with the department. He later wrote to Steve Leigh, an associate dean in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, that he had doubts she would be able to handle eight weeks of teaching this spring, an option they considered.

"Some faculty are very unhappy that she is making that much salary and doing nothing this term," Ross wrote. Troyer could teach an undergraduate seminar on group problem-solving, but "if she were to resign partway through the course, we might be stuck," Ross wrote. In addition, Ross said he was not sure whether the department wanted to put Troyer in front of undergraduates before her case is reviewed.

"If I were a parent paying tuition, having someone who is under review for ethical lapses might bother me," he wrote.

After meeting with her, Ross told Leigh on Feb. 8, "her plan is to spend time in the next few weeks getting the message out about what really happened."

Leigh suggested Troyer develop online courses for the department — not spend university time working on her exoneration.

"I'd like to be clear and indicate that Dr. Troyer must not use either time at work (40 hours) or university resources to get 'the message out about what really happened.' I presume this is understood. I think development of online resources will be rewarding and provide our students with valuable educational opportunities and resources," Leigh wrote to Ross on Feb. 8.

Language on ethics review

Documents also show Troyer objected to language in the offer letter that stated additional campus reviews into the anonymous emails may occur and her "continued cooperation is expected and appreciated."

On Jan. 26, interim Provost Richard Wheeler told Troyer it would be "irresponsible" not to include such language in the letter "that reflects something of the unique circumstances surrounding your assumption of faculty position."

"Should you decide to accept appointment to a salaried tenured position on the Psychology faculty, I am confident that the Department of Psychology and the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences will expect a full review of the implications of the recently released investigative report," he wrote.

Troyer responded that she would "discuss this with my advisory team," and later informed Wheeler that her legal team would henceforth be communicating with the university.

She had also challenged the $109,000 salary offered by the campus and asked Wheeler for more details about how it was derived.

In the end, she accepted the salary, and the offer letter did include the wording about the campus review. And the campus recently began conducting its own review of Troyer following procedures outlined under university statutes on potential sanctions against tenured faculty. Ruth Watkins, dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, is talking with faculty in Troyer's academic units and Wheeler is consulting with the campus senate.

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

buylocalurbana wrote on March 14, 2012 at 8:03 am

Thanks to the N-G and these reporters for continuing to investigate this story and press for FOIA releases. Keep up the good work!

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 14, 2012 at 9:03 am

Is it not time for Dr. Troyer to be allowed "to get the message out about what really happened"?  Doesn't Dr. Troyer deserve a fair, total investigation by an impartial authority?  Would it not be better for a higher State of Illinois authority to conduct a top to bottom investigation allowing the chips to fall where they may?  It would demonstrate that no cover ups took place.  It would allow transparency in the matter.  It would allow for disciplinary actions to take place toward all who were involved in Ethics Rules violations.  Dr. Troyer should be allowed "to get the message out about what really happened" during an investigation with the knowledge that a criminal charge of perjury could result from any untruths.  Dr. Hogan should be allowed the same opportunity.  They are unjustly served by any cozy, back room deal created in the U. of I. system.  They, both, should be allowed their day in court to clear their good names.  A full investigation by a state legal authority is necessary to stop this type of scandal from happening again, and again, and again................

Keith Hays wrote on March 14, 2012 at 1:03 pm

There is no limitation on Dr. Troyer's abillity to "to get the message out about what really happened".  There is no confidentiality agreement between her and the University as she claimed in her statement published in the News-Gazette.  She is free to publish and proclaim "what really happened" until the cows come home, just not on University time or using the University's facilities to do so.  

Dr. Troyer has yet to even attempt to "to get the message out about what really happened".  Instead she has steadfastly asserted that she is prevented from doing so for reasons of confidentiality.  It appears that the offending e-mails originated from her laptop computer.  That assertion of fact is either accurate or inaccurate.  

If the e-mails did not originate from your machine, Dr. Troyer, then tell us from where they did originate?  If, as you claim, you did not type them then who had access to your machine at the time they were sent and who was it that typed them and clicked on send?  And, Dr. Troyer, what motive did the person who typed them have for doing so?  Madame, answering thise questions is how one goes about getting "the message out about what really happened".

urbanaman wrote on March 14, 2012 at 11:03 pm

Unbelievable, the nerve of this manipulative woman. Sounds a lot like the kind of person who might write deceptive emails to some university senate members somewhere in an attempt to unethically sway their opinions.

Hogan himself states that he didn’t hire her to another administration job and said there was no expectation she would get one after she resigned, so where’s the confusion? She helped Emperor Hogan with his affairs after she resigned. Lovely gesture, not subject to monetary compensation from the university. Are there any legal eagles out there to point out what the majority of us may be missing here?

If we can’t muster an angry mob with torches to get rid of Frankentroyer, can legal action be taken against her for obstruction or something, based on the evidence of the Duff & Phelps report? According to the report, it seems like there’s about a .01 % chance that she didn’t send the emails or, at the very least, wasn’t complicit somehow. Isn’t this sufficient circumstantial evidence to take some action once she started, ostensibly, lying about her involvement? Can she at least be liable for the money spent on the investigation?

Someone with some influence who gives a damn about this university and community needs to step in and stop her from continuing to jerk us around. In the meantime, I hope people have sense enough to do some serious, “Amish-style” ostracizing of this former administrative assistant.

Seriously beyond belief, this whole mess...

fredtheduck wrote on March 14, 2012 at 9:03 am

Hogan gets paid hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, and he can't even fire someone correctly.

UIUCHoopFan wrote on March 14, 2012 at 9:03 am

Dear Dr. Troyer,

If you don't like your salary I suggest you pack your bags and head for greener pay pastures elsewhere.  Please take Hogan with you.

Signed,

UIUC Lower Level Functionary

coffeenomnom wrote on March 14, 2012 at 10:03 am

Wow. Lisa Troyer is incredibly spoiled. That chunk of money she got in February is more than my yearly salary working full-time at this university. Unbelievable.

choco640 wrote on March 14, 2012 at 11:03 am

She sure has a lot of nerve and obviously has no clue about anything.  I wouldn't want her to be a teacher to my children!  Get a clue lady!

Steve1us wrote on March 14, 2012 at 12:03 pm

So Sid Saltfork, is that you Lisa? Nobody has said she/you can't prepare a defense; just don't epxect the University to pay you for doing it. And Troyer was "preparing remarks" for the President? He already has people doing that; they are called speechwriters. So Lisa, you want to get paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for defending yourself against charges that experts say show you sent these emails, for doing a job that wasn't even necessary till Hogan brought you in, be on faculty at a department that doesn't want you - while not teaching or do anything else? Got it. Just do everyone a favor and go away.

But it all goes back to Hogan. He has created extra layers of bureaucracy and millions of dollars in extra salary and other expenses with the new vice-chancelors and their staffs (some hired without searches) and remodeled offices, his own and Wise's extra pay, bonuses, partner hires, buddy hires etc. since he got here.  And we've seen the results: scandal and millions wasted  while the U of I has had cutbacks,layoffs etc.:  So Lisa, please take Hogan with you.  

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 14, 2012 at 2:03 pm

How about reading my comment in full before making a ridiculous assumption.  No, I am not Lisa Troyer.  If you read any of my previous comments regarding the unethical behavior, you would know that.  I believe the whole matter was handled inappropriately.  The matter should have not been left with the U. of I.; and for Hogan to cover up.  It should have been investigated by the State Office of the Inspector General, or the State Attorney General for Ethics Rules violations which if proven would result in disciplinary actions up to employment termination.  Both are State of Illinois employees.  The investigation would have included the charge of perjury if the truth was not told.  There would have been no "contracts" pay out, no retirement, and no golden parachute job if they were found guilty in the investigation.  They would have been fired the same as any other state employee who engages in unethical behavior.  Gotta it now, Steve1us.

newen78 wrote on March 14, 2012 at 12:03 pm

This is outrageous. The UI tried to make it seem like this had all been handled by saying that Troyer had resigned. Nowhere did they say that she was continuing to work in her role. What other ethical violations have been done by her and her laptop during this time? As a student employee, I have been required to take an annual ethics test  - as all employees are required to take. I am sure Dr. Troyer has taken this same test, did she not learn anything from it? What do her multiple degrees tell her about the violations she has done? Shocking still is President Hogan's reaction and responses about the situation. He knew she was still working, he allowed it, yet assured in several statements that the problem was being taken care of. How could everyone leave out the fact she was continuing to work? Mr. Kennedy and Board of Trustees - this is just as bad as any admission scandals - this is clear violations of roles, responsibilities and ethics. How does this coincide with your direction for Hogan to repair ties? Were you made aware Dr. Troyer was still working? It's time to do your job - dismiss President Hogan and Dr. Troyer - don't put up with anymore of this wool being pulled over your eyes. 

jmh910 wrote on March 14, 2012 at 12:03 pm

Rich people and their problems.  I am so sick of hearing about this woman. 

choco640 wrote on March 14, 2012 at 4:03 pm

I agree with you..I also am sick of hearing about this woman.  I am also sick of seeing her picture everywhere!

Fedupwithstatereps wrote on March 14, 2012 at 12:03 pm

Greedy much Troyer?  Here's a clue for your future jobs -- if you resign your position, then you stop working.  Duh.

KSearsmith wrote on March 14, 2012 at 12:03 pm

I am glad to see the News-Gazette continuing its investigation and reporting its findings, however disappointing they may be for the entire University of Illinois community.

At this point, I would hope that Dr. Troyer would set aside the degree of self-interest the current article seems to find her expressing  in her ongoing HR negotiations, and to instead begin to assert, and act upon, ways in which she can be of service to the institution. I imagine that one way would be to resolve this controversy as soon as possible, so that the University might avoid further external scandal and internal conflict, and another would be to focus on cooperating with her academic department to work in whatever way her colleagues think best to further the objectives of their faculty and students.

I would also hope that President Hogan would affirm as soon as possible that he has firmly decided to recuse himself from any treatment of his former Chief of Staff's ethics review or employment status and its particulars. He should name an independently charged, highly placed, and capable administrator to manage these processes in his stead and to make any final decisions about Dr. Troyer's relative fates.

These actions are what I believe individuals with a devotion to the University of Illinois and its ideals should take to preserve the reputation of the institution and to restore the trust of its stakeholders. I hope that the actors named here and the Board of Trustees will take these recommendations to heart.

Kelly Searsmith, Ph.D.

doctoral alumna, UIUC Department of English

former administrator, UIUC

Lostinspace wrote on March 14, 2012 at 1:03 pm

Departments and students are suffering for lack of money, but the university offers lavish rewards for failed administrators and coaches.  Some way to run a railroad.

GeneralLeePeeved wrote on March 14, 2012 at 1:03 pm

Hey, Pres. Hogan, the 10 days that the BOT gave you are about to run out.  You think allowing this travesty (that YOU helped create) to continue counts as a progressive step towards regaining the faculty's trust?  ....just checking.

kostasyfantis wrote on March 14, 2012 at 1:03 pm

The ethical nightmare seems to be never-ending...

read the DI wrote on March 14, 2012 at 1:03 pm

Does Troyer deserve to get paid for working? Of course.

But she would be wise -- I know, not a term often heard in tandem with her name -- to collect her check and move on. Her ability to contribute to U of I in any capacity has been undone. To (try to) stay on now simply undermines any last attempt for Dr. Hogan to rectify his own transgressions with the faculty, and gives the strong impression that he is buying Troyer's silence.

jwr12 wrote on March 14, 2012 at 2:03 pm

It seems to me--almost more than any other story so far--this new information raises profound and possibly irresolvable questions about President Hogan's ability to do his job, and to be honest with the public.  At least as reported in the public press, every time he has been asked if he is still in contact with Lisa Troyer, he has responded (somewhat sentimentally) that he still calls her as an "old friend."  But now we learn that in fact she has been still working for him, and that furthermore in allowing her to do so he has potentially legally obligated the University to pay her a salary which, meanwhile, the public was led to understand she had lost.  Furthermore, Troyer makes all too plausible claims about how he was (again, contrary to public assertions) directly involved in working out scenarios for her future, up to and including asking her to draft possible options. Last, but not least, he seems to  be using the necessity to recuse himself as kind of a shield for all this conduct, such that when the HR director informs him of what he has done, he throws the responsibility for the consequences back on her, saying it's "her call" whether to pay Troyer for further work -- as if she should be the one left holding the bag!  And that's just scratching the surface of the questions this story raises.  I hope the Trustees are reading the News Gazette, and really thinking through what all this means.

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 14, 2012 at 3:03 pm

jwr12;   Well said.  Hogan's lack of leadership ability has been clearly demonstrated.   I do not have much faith in the appointed Board of Trustees leadership though.  I am curious who Troyer's "advisors" are as referenced in her e-mails.  Her statement almost appeared as a threat.  It did not seem to include attorneys.  I wondered if Hogan was an "advisor"; and was involved in the "promises" made to her.   This travesty should be taken out of the U. of I.'s hands; and given to a higher authority.  I am curious, also, why the local elected legislators have not become involved.  Where is the standard statement about a legislative investigation?  It is an election year.  One would have thought they would have pounced on this scandal for votes.  

asparagus wrote on March 14, 2012 at 3:03 pm

Who vetted and hired these clowns?

http://articles.courant.com/2010-08-29/news/hc-op-rennie-uconn-hogan-082...

Deals For Friends? UConn Deserves Better From Boss

"E-mails obtained under a Freedom of Information request to the University of Connecticut reveal that outgoing President Michael Hogan spent his last weeks in Storrs trying to reconfigure important parts of the administration and obtain bonuses and salary increases for favored subordinates.

Hogan's intrigues met the fierce resistance of UConn board of trustees Chairman Larry McHugh, who succeeded in stopping Hogan from rewarding friends as he bolted to the University of Illinois. Hogan persevered until his final hours. University presidents are not accustomed to being told "no."

...

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 14, 2012 at 3:03 pm

asparagus;  Good work.  The entire article says a lot about why the U. of I. has something smelly on it's shoes. 

urbanaman wrote on March 15, 2012 at 12:03 am

Exactly, asparagus! The search committee and U of I Board of Trustees had all the red flags in the world waving in their faces and yet they happily wheel in The Trojan Horse. Congratulations U of I Board. I'd say you deserve every bit of this ugly and unseemly ordeal, except that it's such a horrific embarrassment to this whole community. Clean up this mess and try not to let it happen again. The "best and the brightest," my foot. 

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 14, 2012 at 5:03 pm

asparagus;  You asked who vetted Dr. Hogan, and company.  The search committee members can be found at www.uillinois.edu/our/news/2009/nov12search.cfm .  Interesting that Dr. Ting, UIS campus, was on the search committee.  Remember Dr. Ting's involvement in the "anonymous e-mail" when the story first came out.  The firm who did the vetting, if there was a firm, was not mentioned; but the search committee members are listed.       

buylocalurbana wrote on March 14, 2012 at 8:03 pm

Here's a link to the press release that works:

http://www.uillinois.edu/our/news/2009/Nov12.Search.cfm

Note that the vice-chair of the search committee was Prof. May Barenbaum, who subsequently signed the letter to the Trustees urging them to dismiss Hogan.

http://will.illinois.edu/news/spotstory/hogan-no-confidence-letter-submi...

 

Lostinspace wrote on March 14, 2012 at 10:03 pm

Professor Berenbaum, who knows her insects, is a significant figure and an important member of the faculty.  That she should change her mind so swiftly feeds the suspicion that there is more to all this than meets the eye.  It would be nice to here from her.

Alexander wrote on March 14, 2012 at 10:03 pm

It's worthwhile to emphasize that just because someone is on the search committee that someone didn't necessarily agree with hiring Hogan.

Cynically, if you want to know who hired Hogan, it was all the complainers and Jodi Cohen at the Tribune who inflamed passions to push White to resign. In my opinion, he was a good president, with excellent credentials, who did a lot for the U of I. Yes, he was ensnarled into the "category" scandal. He was also paid 200K less than Hogan and I'd take him back in a heartbeat right now.

After forcing out a quality president like that, is it really surprising that good candidates wouldn't want any part of U of I? Since we don't know officially who Hogan's competitors were, perhaps Hogan was the best of the lot (sad).

If anyone knows otherwise, I'd be happy to hear it.

Keith Hays wrote on March 15, 2012 at 6:03 am

If you want to find the root of the difficulty facing the University of Illinois you must look back farther than the sojourns of President White and Chancellor Herman.  In my opinion it goes back to when the University began to transmogrify itself from an institute devoted to the acquisition, transmission, and disemination of knowledge in service to the People of Illinois into a commercial concern providing outsourced R & D services to international corporate industries.  That change developed over decades and the symptoms have long festered.

Perhaps it began when the University sacrificed the south farms for the creation of a comercial real estate development under private management serving its R & D clients.  Perhaps it has continued with sucessive university administrations that began to evaluate units of the University not by the quality of the instruction, research, and service produced but rather by the quantity of grant revenue generated.  It has continued with the destruction of service units; the Illinois Police Training Institute; the Institute of Aviation; severe cuts that will lead to the eventual elimination of the U of I Extension Service because those units are not "within the Univerity's core mission".  When the administrations began to look at its descrete parts as profit centers; when they saw the University not as a quality educational institution but as a brand to be marketed; it was inevitable that university goverance could not successfully follow the bottom up collegiate model developed at the University of Paris in the Middle Ages.

Increasingly the University has sought to move to a top down corporate management model.  Dr. Hogan and his faithful retainer Dr. Troyer are not the cause of the crisis in leadership facing the University.  The conflict in the two modes of governance was inevitable.  Hogan-Troyer just had the bad luck to be sitting behind the deak when it erupted.          

Lostinspace wrote on March 15, 2012 at 9:03 am

In other words, when the university made the transition from a public service institution to a commercial business, under pressure of shrinking government support.

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 15, 2012 at 9:03 am

And corporate administrative salaries with increased lack of transparency.  Hogan, and Troyer are public employees though; not corporate officers.

GoingtoHeck wrote on March 15, 2012 at 9:03 am

THEY don't seem to realize that!

Lostinspace wrote on March 15, 2012 at 10:03 am

In what sense public?  State funding continues to drop, and the university depends more and more on student tuition/fees and on business/research investment.  The idea of a duty to the public is being replaced by bottom-line considerations.  Undergraduate students and their families (with an increasing portion of out-state and foreign attendance) shoulder more and more of the cost, receiving less and less in return (larger classes, fewer classes taught by faculty and more by part-timers and TAs).

It seems to me that the corporate model is increasingly apt, with in-class education being just one sector, and a neglected one at that.

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 15, 2012 at 5:03 pm

Lostinspace;  I agree with your comments except of a couple of things.  Hogan, and Troyer are on the SURS system as it still exists.  Both are classifed as state employees.  Taxpayers do pay taxes which go to the state pension systems of which I am a member; plus I am a taxpayer.  Whether the U. of I. is becoming a private educational institution based on decreased, "promised" funding or not; both Hogan, and Troyer are currently state employees.  I do think that the public has every right to complain about unethical behavior by state employees.  As a former state employee, I hear enough misinformed complaints from state employee haters.  Hogan, and Troyer remaining employed after their unethical behavior adds to the complaints.  Both of them should face a comprehensive investigation conducted by an authority outside of the U. of I.  If found guilty of violations of the state Ethics Rules; they should be dismissed with loss of all benefits including pension benefits.

Keith Hays wrote on March 15, 2012 at 10:03 am

Then there is the marketing of the Illinois "Brand" to international students at the expense of places for Illinois students because their governments don't blink at paying out-of-state.  The explicitly stated rationale was that an emphasis on recruiting of foreign students generated substantially more revenue and was thus more important  than fulfilling the mission of educating Illinois students.  Then we were "shocked" to learn that entry into the U of I became a valuable commodity such that political clout was a factor in the admissions policy.  That too, like the present crisis, was inevitable in the circumstances.

Lostinspace wrote on March 15, 2012 at 1:03 pm

Yes, indeed.  The notion that qualified Illinois high school graduates can come to the university and receive top-notch general education and training within a discipline is crumbling.  Some departments do provide excellent training for majors and graduate students.  Some do not.  Some receive support.  Some do not.  Follow the money.  The general education segment is neglected and is too often a scattering of unrelated, poorly staffted courses, thought of as an obstacle rather than an opportunity to be intellectually stimulated.  These courses, done right, are labor intensive and too expensive.

ClearVision wrote on March 20, 2012 at 1:03 pm

Wow. Just wow. When will she realize she has no institutional, social, or ethical credibility and do the honorable thing-- leave! And hopefully pull the throne out from under King Hogan on her way out.