UI trustees saw little chance for reconciliation between Hogan, faculty

UI trustees saw little chance for reconciliation between Hogan, faculty

URBANA — Three weeks ago, on a board-ordered mission to rebuild his standing with faculty and the public, University of Illinois President Michael Hogan expressed confidence that he would still be in office a year from now.

Within a week he had tendered his resignation, effective July 1.

Unrelenting pressure from the campus's top faculty and new revelations about Hogan's former chief of staff apparently convinced UI trustees that he would be unable to effectively lead the university, board members told The News-Gazette last week.

"There were just so many things piling up, we didn't think he was going to be able to reconcile with the faculty," Trustee Timothy Koritz said. "You obviously can't have an organization where the faculty doesn't work with the chief executive officer."

"There were two things," added Trustee Karen Hasara. "The Lisa Troyer incident that caused a lot of concern mostly with the faculty and the board, and the letter from all the well-known and wonderful faculty members like Nobel Prize winners and long-term faculty — that was the tipping point. We had to take that very seriously."

Last week, The News-Gazette contacted the other UI trustees, in addition to Hasara and Koritz. They either did not return phone calls or declined comment.

Through UI spokesman Tom Hardy, Hogan declined to discuss his resignation.

As they met at the Illini Union on March 15, trustees were handed a new letter from more than 100 of the UI's most prestigious professors, saying the board needed to fire Hogan immediately or risk losing its own ability to govern.

The faculty members had urged Hogan's departure in an earlier letter, but they were upset by former chief of staff Lisa Troyer's claims that she had continued working after stepping down from her administrative post and wanted to be paid for that time. The details were published in The News-Gazette on March 14.

The board met with Hogan in closed session on March 15 and reached a consensus that "we needed to try to do something," Koritz said.

"We had a long talk with Mike," Koritz said. "We thought, 'This just isn't working out.'"

"Obviously the faculty are a huge part of the university. We want to all be working together. If it's a situation where one group won't work with another group, we've got problems and the board needs to try to do something about that."

The board "negotiated strategies," he said, agreeing to keep everything under wraps until they knew what Hogan wanted to do and that Bob Easter would be willing to succeed him for the next two years.

Easter, who was the interim chancellor for the Urbana campus after Richard Herman resigned in October 2009, "was the logical person to look to," according to Hasara. "We knew we needed someone respected on the Urbana campus and someone who would not ignore the other two campuses."

Trustees agreed that Kennedy would meet with Hogan that weekend, March 17-18, and "see how he felt about it, and if we could come to a mutually agreeable strategy," Koritz said.

Koritz said he wasn't privy to those conversations but said Kennedy kept them apprised of developments.

Asked if Hogan was forced out, Koritz said: "I got the feeling that it was mutually agreeable. Mike felt really frustrated. It was going to be a huge mountain to climb to maybe surmount what had gone on, and maybe it was better to move on. That's the impression I got from Chris.

"When we talked about Mike and possibly asking him if he would consider resigning, the chairman asked for anyone to voice their dissent. A few of us said, 'This is really unfortunate,' but I think most of us felt in the end the consensus was we needed to go ahead and look at that."

On March 22, the day Hogan's resignation was announced, board Chairman Chris Kennedy said the decision was solely Hogan's.

"Mike initiated this action," Kennedy said then. "Mike scheduled the meeting to discuss it with me and Mike indicated immediately that the discussion was about his decision to resign as president. There were only two of us in the room. It was Mike's decision."

Hasara said she regrets that Hogan has taken so much criticism in recent months.

"We all appreciate what President Hogan did. And I guess you could blame us for setting the direction that we had — to cut back on things and save money," she said.

But Hasara does not regret the directives the board has given to Hogan since he joined the university in July 2010. One of the board's goals for Hogan this fiscal year was to move forward with changing the way the university handles enrollment management, the contentious issue that sparked debate among faculty last fall.

Given budget constraints in recent years, universities and other organizations have all had to look at their core missions and figure out ways to be more efficient, Hasara said. That includes how the university handles enrollment management, she said.

Perhaps not all the initiatives considered for enrollment management will be implemented, but "we'll count on Bob Easter" to figure out what those initiatives might be, she said.

"I am so convinced going forward the university is going to be fine. I'm hoping over the next six months Bob Easter will prove he's everything we're hoping he will be. ... The university is so much bigger than the president, the chancellor or a few faculty members," Hasara said.

Trustees said they were all too mindful that they had taken office after the resignation of another president, B. Joseph White, during the Category I admissions scandal.

"I don't think any of us wanted to see this happen. In the end we just felt it was in the best interests of the university. And I think President Hogan felt that, too. Nobody wanted to come to this," Koritz said.

The timing of Hogan's announcement caught most observers by surprise, though speculation was rampant that he would resign by the end of the fiscal year.

"I had a sense that inevitably, one way or the other, at a moment in the not terribly distant future, Dr. Hogan would step down. But I certainly did not expect the announcement to come on (that) Thursday," said Professor Joyce Tolliver, vice chairwoman of the campus senate, who had strongly criticized Hogan in a senate speech in February.

One scenario had Hogan's resignation coming by April 9, the next scheduled meeting of the Senate Executive Committee, which would set the agenda for the final Urbana campus senate meeting of the semester on April 30. Any move for a faculty no-confidence vote would have had to be made by that date, Tolliver said.

Tolliver said she knew of no plans for such a vote, but "it would not have been a surprise the way things were moving." Still, she felt that wasn't the "desired outcome."

"Many of us felt it was so much better if the president could respond himself and take the initiative to resign, rather than having a more complex situation in which there would be a formal vote of no-confidence," Tolliver said. "Everybody knows votes of no-confidence are not so good for the reputation of the campus in general, or the image of stability on the campus."

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

millbo368 wrote on April 02, 2012 at 8:04 am

Regardless of how he was removed from the Presidency, I just glad he's not in that position anymore. I do wish Hogan, Troyer, Herman, White, Edgar, and all the former administrators would go on their merry way without getting a huge paycheck Yes, I include Jime Edgar in there as well. He "works" for the IGPA but what does he really do. These professors who teach our aspiring bright students and do relevant/important research across all disciplines, I think should be well compensated. However, just because you're a former administrator doesn't mean you should still draw a huge salary and have a position just because of tenure or political reputation.

Also, now that Bob Easter will guide the ship, I hope Chris Kennedy let's him do things. From I hear and have read, Hogan was nothing but a puppet for the board. Easter knows UI, is well respected, and has the administrative higher ed experience to get UI where it hopefully needs to be. I would just assume Kennedy step down as well and run his own ship in Chicago which be's probably very good at.

Just my two cents...

Steve1us wrote on April 02, 2012 at 7:04 pm

Well said.

mcleanm72 wrote on April 02, 2012 at 7:04 pm

I am glad to see Ms. Hasara is accepting blame on behalf of the board for President Hogan's resignation.  I would however disagree that it was was not the direction you set for him that was the issue. The issue was that he was actually having success implementing your directions and when there was pushback the board panicked and bailed out. 

plumstead wrote on April 03, 2012 at 9:04 am

After seven years at the University of Illinois (B.S., 1970; J.D. 1973), and living 50 miles away ever since, I believe my observations may have some credibility.  The decline of the prestige and honor of the University of Illinois started, in my view, when certain governors and legislators decided that the university's board of trustees would no longer be elected at-large statewide, but, instead, would be appointed by the governor.  It is the highest of honors to be a university trustee, and instead of allowing the people of Illinois to decide who is worthy of this honor, we have turned the choice into a political gift of a prestigious position for governors to dole out.  As a consequence, the board of trustees is no longer capable of exercising oversight and control of the university.  One of the finest universities in the world has been placed in the hands of an inner circle of politically connected people beholden to the governor.  All alums who have paid attention to university operations in recent years can see the continuing evidence of the mismanagement of our beloved alma mater.  From cooking the books showing the credentials of incoming law students, to admitting students less qualified because of political connections, to classless firings of coaches before seasons are finished, to the dilution of university resources in taking over Sangamon State, to hiring of ineffective presidents unacceptable to large numbers of faculty members (the lifeblood of the university), you will not fail to notice the tears streaming down the faces of the three figures comprising the Alma Mater statue.  Long live the University of Illinois.