UI slips in overall rankings, holds steady among public universities

UPDATED 10 p.m. Wednesday.

URBANA — The University of Illinois slipped slightly in overall national rankings, but held steady when compared with other public universities, according to the latest rankings published in U.S. News & World Report.

Meanwhile, engineering edged out other undergraduate engineering programs to rank fifth in the country, up from sixth last year, according to a peer survey. Several of the College of Engineering's programs, including agricultural and civil, claimed top spots.

Not surprisingly, the top-ranked universities in U.S. News & World Report's annual college rankings report were Harvard University and Princeton University, tied at first, followed by Yale, and Columbia University and the University of Chicago share fourth place.

Among Big Ten universities, Northwestern University, which is the only private Big Ten school, placed highest, followed by Michigan and Wisconsin. Illinois and Penn State were fourth among Big Ten schools.

The UI placed 13th among public universities, the same spot it held last year. Two years ago the UI ranked 15th among public universities.

This year the university tied for 46th among national college rankings, sharing the spot with Penn State, the University of Texas-Austin, University of Washington and Yeshiva University in New York. Last year the UI was in a five-way tie for the 45th spot with Penn State, UT-Austin, University of Washington, Yeshiva and the University of California-Irvine. UC-Irvine is now ranked 44th. Two years ago the UI came in 47th in the rankings.

This year the University of Michigan ranks 29th and the University of Wisconsin-Madison came in at 41.

The rankings take into consideration the acceptance rate, average freshman retention rate, graduation rates, classes with under 20 students, SAT/ACT percentiles, alumni giving and more.

The UI's acceptance rate is 68 percent, the student-faculty ratio is 18 to 1, and 34 percent of classes have 20 students or less. Its average freshmen retention rate is 94 percent and the alumni giving rate is 13 percent.

"The important thing to remember about U.S. News rankings is ... some metrics guide our pedagogical decisions and some do not," said Robin Kaler, associate chancellor for public affairs and chief campus spokeswoman.

For example, some of the rankings are calculated by taking into account peer assessment of the university by high school guidance counselors or leaders from other universities.

Over at the College of Engineering, interim Dean Mike Bragg said rankings were "very important" for recruiting reasons.

"They allow us to attract the very best people: faculty and students. We attract students from all over the U.S. and the world. Those students almost always, without exception, have looked at these rankings," he said.

What's notable about rankings, he said, is that schools with top rankings attract the best people, and having the best people helps the school rank highly.

The College of Engineering's undergraduate program ranked fifth alongside the Georgia Institute of Technology this year. Top engineering programs include Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1), Stanford University (2), and California Institute of Technology and UC-Berkeley (tied at 3).

Last year, UI engineering ranked sixth, according to the survey, which is peer-based.

Bragg said he attributes the rise to the college's increased efforts on improving its undergraduate education program, including working on retention of first- and second-year students and adding more of a focus on entrepreneurial classes.

That has meant "focusing more on what students want to accomplish, such as solving problems with water or energy," he said.

In the College of Engineering, both agricultural engineering and civil engineering ranked first, up from the second spot last year. In addition, the engineering physics program and materials science earned spots at No. 2.

Big Ten rankings

How the Big Ten's public universities rank in comparison with other public universities in U.S. News & World Report's 2013 national university rankings:

UniversityNational universitiesPublic universitiesMichigan 294Wisconsin4110Illinois 4613Penn State 4613Ohio State 5618Purdue 6523Minnesota6825Michigan State 7228Iowa 7228Indiana 8336Nebraska 10146

 

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

annabellissimo wrote on September 13, 2012 at 7:09 pm

I think it’s unfortunate, but not surprising, that the University of Illinois’ rankings have declined, in whatever low regard one holds college ranking systems like US News and others.  Whether it’s magazine rankings or fundraising or enrollment recruitment, the U of I does a very poor job of presenting itself to the public.  As an alum, it pains me to see the kinds of PR and marketing associated with the U of I, not to mention the actual news reports of scandals and conflicts, and, of course, the abominable way that the State of Illinois involves itself in higher education, by way of trying to destroy it and simultaneously using it as personal fiefdom of corrupt politicians and those held hostage by their extortion tactics! Addressing only the PR:  compare the ideas and images that one holds about the University of Michigan, Harvard, and the University of Illinois.  I would bet that most people would list Michigan and Harvard as being academically superior to Illinois, but in fact, that would not be true.  Why do we hold those ideas? PR!  The opportunity afforded to Big 10 universities to advertise themselves on the Big 10 network, especially during big games, is one method to present those ideas to the public.  Michigan seems rich in tradition, focused on academic excellence, outstanding in research, science, medicine.  A year or two ago, the “spots” about Illinois during Big 10 games featured what?  A guy in a classroom who was portrayed as a mediocre student and a comedian.  THAT’S really how we want to think of ourselves and have others think of us?  We are a mediocre joke?? It made me feel embarrassed and ashamed and angry to see MY university portrayed that way and I couldn’t imagine any student or donor that we would WANT to attract being attracted by that.  I read that of ALL of the universities in the entire WORLD having a direct association with winning the Noble Prize, the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, is Number 29  – in the WORLD. The University of Michigan and Harvard weren’t there in the top numbers.  We are rich in science, technology, research, the arts, the humanities and so on and son on, but what does OUR OWN PR organization emphasize?  Our mediocrity!  I get the alumni publications and I see the extraordinary accomplishments and research projects of our faculty, alums, administration, and I feel proud. But in contrast, what is the “Illinois Story” to the public? Mediocrity, business aspects of agribusiness, athletes who also happen to have academic accomplishments, and other ideas and images that don’t emphasize the importance, the accomplishment, the great achievements!  This kind of campaign downward is damaging to those who already have Illinois degrees and will negatively affect the university’s future as well.  Why did I mention Harvard earlier?  Because, Harvard is largely ABOUT its PR!  They are, in fact, no better than any other university, but we all THINK they are and so that works wonders for them, and a feedback loop is created for them that works to further enrich their financial status, their enrollment,and their academic reputation. RIGOR, REPUTATION, REPORTING are three key elements of a great university.  The State of Illinois is doing all it can to destroy the quality of higher education in this state, but the University of Illinois shouldn’t design its own PR campaigns to be complicit in that lowering of quality!