Frerichs, Bambenek seek 52nd District Senate seat

The race for the state Senate in the 52nd District pits an incumbent who has served in the General Assembly since 2007 against a businessman experienced in preventing cybercrime and electronic fraud.

Mike Frerichs, D-Champaign, said he decided to seek a third term because he wants to complete the work he has begun.

"I think there is a lot of work yet to do, whether it be supporting higher education and K-12 schools, preserving the environment or supporting the business community, so I want to continue to serve the people of our area," Frerichs said.

Frerichs' opponent, John Bambenek, R-Champaign, is the owner of Bambenek Consulting, a cybercrime and electronic fraud prevention firm and principal security consultant for Ciber, an IT consulting firm.

Bambenek ran unsuccessfully for the Champaign school board in 2007.

Bambenek said he decided to run for the state Senate to do his part to make the state better for his three young children.

"If you take the state debt divided by every man, woman and child in Illinois, you get $31,600," Bambenek said. "As a father of a 5-year-old, a 3-year-old and a 1-year-old, that's unacceptable to me. I want them to build their lives here in East Central Illinois when they grow up. But, if we stay on the same path, it doesn't look like it will happen."

Frerichs supports the addition of a riverboat casino in Danville.

"I support it because I have been contacted by many constituents who have asked me to support it," Frerichs said. "It's not their first choice for economic development for the area. It would bring in much needed revenue to be used in the schools in Vermilion County, roads and bridges and public safety. It would also create jobs and bring in tourism dollars."

Bambenek said he is opposed to bringing a riverboat casino to Danville.

"Casinos as economic development have not been successful in Elgin, East Peoria or the Metro East," Bambenek said. "We need to be creating jobs. When my kids grow up, I don't want to say the jobs I created for them is to be a bouncer or a cocktail waitress. The expansion of gambling is destructive from the real work that needs to be done."

Frerichs said one of his priorities during his next term would be turning around the state's economy.

"We need to provide stability to businesses, and we need to manage our deficit," Frerichs "I worked in a bipartisan manner on the extension of the Illinois Enterprise Zone Act, which has been credited for $50 billion of investment and 900,000 jobs. When we have more employees, it is good for the state's economy."

Bambenek said he believes the biggest obstacle to turning around the Illinois economy is its government, which he says has caused many businesses to choose to leave the state.

"We know about 30,000 jobs have left every month since the tax hike was passed," Bambenek said. "Our first step should be to get the budget under control and then get spending under control. Simply repealing the tax hike without doing the hard work of getting a handle on state spending will allow the deficit to continue."

Frerichs said balancing the budget and developing a trained workforce are keys to turning around the state's fiscal situation.

"To provide stability, we need to get the budget balanced and the bills paid. We need to make sure we have a well-trained workforce to make Illinois competitive."

Bambenek wrote a book,"Illinois Deserves Better," which outlines several proposed reforms to the Illinois Constitution that he says "would reduce the corruption and dysfunction in Springfield."

Some examples include establishing term limits for all state offices and reducing the powers of the party leaders in the Illinois House and Senate.

"One of the fundamental problems of the Illinois political system is that too much power is concentrated in too few hands," Bambenek said. "No bill gets passed without Mike Madigan's approval. Right now the power is consolidated in the head Democrat in the House and the head Democrat in the Senate. But even if we had Republicans in those offices, there still would be political abuse. That is why we have so much corruption in Illinois."

Frerichs said he wants the state to do a better job of funding the University of Illinois.

"If we want to keep college affordable for the citizens of Illinois, we need to do a better job of funding the university without tying their hands," Frerichs said. "One example was the elimination of general assembly scholarships, something I supported for several years."

If elected, Bambenek says he would work to make sure that the state pays the UI all the money it is owed.

"The state owes the university about $400 million, and the state can't make the payment," said Bambenek, a former research programmer for the UI. "We need to fix state finances and get those bills paid."

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Sid Saltfork wrote on October 20, 2012 at 11:10 am

Recently candidates running for office met with the local retired state, and university employees.  Mike Frerichs attended, and answered questions.  All of the other candidates for the senate, and house of representatives showed up except for one.  John Bambenek did not show up.  I did not hear any explanation for his absence.  I have no first hand knowledge of his opinions on the proposed pension reform, or paying the pension debt owed to the pension systems.  I realize that John Bambenek wants to change the Illinois Constitution; but beyond his book there has been no face to face interaction with questions from the voters.  He seems to be a low profile candidate beyond sound bites, and a few media interviews.

bambenek wrote on October 20, 2012 at 6:10 pm

I am not sure what meeting you are referring to but I have attended ever forum I have been invited to. The simple answer is probablt I never got invite perhaps for some simple reason of a wrong address. As for my feelings on the issues, I have weitten a book, Illinois Deserves Better which touches on pensions. Its available on Amazon but I would be happy to give you a free copy. I have also written a few op-eds on pensions as well. In short, I subscribe to Fortner's pension reform plan available on IL House GOP website (not to be confused with the Civic Fed plan pushed by Cross). Feel free to send me your address to john at johnbambenek.com and I will mail you a book. 

Sid Saltfork wrote on October 20, 2012 at 10:10 pm

Thank you for responding.  Perhaps, you were not invited to attend the AFSCME retirees meeting at the Urbana Civic Center earlier this month.  I do not recall seeing you there. 

I will access the Fortner's pension reform plan on the Illinois House of Representatives GOP website.  I will contact you at your website also.  I appreciate that you do not agree with the Civic Federation plan.  Do you agree that the Civic Federation which is a private group has corporate influence on the legislature? 

Also, I want to thank you for filing the lawsuit against Amendment 49.  I worked for the State of Illinois for 40 plus years before retiring.  I have lost faith in the legislature, and both political parties.  I have seen the corruption from the inside during my tenure as a state employee.  After paying into the SERS pension system all of my adult working life; I am seeing my pension being stolen.  

I regret if I angered you.  I do not use spellcheck either. Thank you again for responding.

bambenek wrote on October 21, 2012 at 2:10 pm

You didn't anger me, happy to answer questions.

As far as the AFSCME forum, I did not receive an invitation.  I heard about it the day before and I was told it was a forum for existing legislators, not a political forum with candidates.  Incumbents tend to get invited to a few more things to speak to "governmental forums" and that's just part of the incumbent advantage.

As far as the Civic Federation, I would say it a different way.  It doesn't bother me that X or Y group can make their views known.  The problem in Illinois politics is that every day citizens don't have influence.  It's a question of balance and Illinois is politically out of balance.

When you have 80% of General Assembly seats as simply uncompetitive and therefore immune from the influence of the voters, you have groups, whether the Civic Federation on the right, or other groups on the left, who tend to have disproportionate say in government.

As far as Amendment 49, you're welcome.  On the ballot we need to play it straight and no one knows what the ballot is even saying.  I'm tired of Springfield obfuscation of everything.

  

Sid Saltfork wrote on October 21, 2012 at 11:10 pm

Thank you for responding.  I have to admit that your response to my question is reasonable.  I tend to agree with you.  I remain skeptical of Illinois politicians; but your views, and more importantly action on Amendment 49 are appreciated.

Again, thank you for responding.  You have made a favorable impression on me.  However, I am just one person.  Good luck to you in the election.