State includes Champaign in incentive to buy vacant homes

State includes Champaign in incentive to buy vacant homes

CHAMPAIGN — With the number of vacant houses across the nation on the upswing, Illinois is expanding a program that gives buyers of vacant houses up to $10,000 toward their downpayment and closing costs.

The year-old Building Blocks program is being expanded to 10 more, mostly suburban cities, in the state. The program now includes Champaign, although several other central Illinois cities, like Danville and Decatur, are also struggling with vacant housing stock and have higher proportions of empty homes.

As part of the "Year of Homeownership in Illinois," Gov. Pat Quinn last week announced the expansion of the program. Under the program, low- to moderate-income home buyers may qualify for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, currently 4 percent, and $10,000 in down payment and closing cost assistance.

The cities of Champaign, Belleville, Blue Island, Cicero, Crest Hill, Joliet, Lockport, Lynwood, Melrose Park and Peoria now join the existing communities of Berwyn, Chicago Heights, Maywood, Park Forest and South Holland in the Illinois Building Blocks program, administered by the Illinois Housing Development Authority.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2010, there were 15 million vacant housing units in the nation, an increase of 43.8 percent since 2000 when the number of vacant housing units totaled 10.4 million. Those 15 million units in 2010 represented 11.4 percent of the total housing units in the nation.

And locally, according to the 2010 Census, 2,227, or 6.5 percent, of Champaign's 34,434 total housing units were vacant. Of the more than 2,000 vacancies, 1,255 for were for rent and 385 were for sale only, while another 309 were listed as "all other vacants."

In Danville, the total number of vacant housing units, 1,876, was less than in Champaign, according to the Census, but it's a larger proportion of the total housing stock, 12.7 percent. And of those vacancies, 999 were for rent and 264 were for sale only, while 877 were listed as "all other vacants."

The goal of the Building Blocks program is to encourage the reuse of vacant single-family properties and help working families take advantage of the market's currently low housing prices, according to IHDA.

Danville and Champaign housing officials said last week they were not yet aware of the program.

Rebecca Boykin, spokeswoman with IHDA, said a number of factors were considered in choosing what additional cities in Illinois would be included in the Building Blocks program. She said population was a factor, giving more weight to larger cities, as well as previous funding through the Neighborhood Stabilization Program, which made federal funds available for the rehabilitation of vacant housing units to help stabilize communities in the wake of foreclosures and abandonments.

Champaign received about $2 million in neighborhood stabilization funds, according to Boykin, which the city has used to rehab dilapidated properties.

Boykin said the Building Blocks program will build off of the neighborhood program by making the downpayment assistance available to those buying rehabbed properties in Champaign. But Boykin said it's not limited to vacant properties touched by the NSP program. Any low- or moderate-income buyer can take advantage of the Building Blocks downpayment assistance to buy vacant housing in Champaign as long as they meet the income requirements and intend to make the vacant housing their primary residence.

"With this new program, we are leveraging that previous investment to help the community return properties to the tax rolls. The program will not only benefit potential homeowners and working families, but also help the communities take these vacant properties and return them to use. Home sales have a ripple economic effect," Boykin said.

She said for a household of one or two people, the maximum annual household income must be $72,100 or less. If anyone is interested in taking advantage of the program, she said a list of participating lenders offering the downpayment and closing cost assistance in each community can be found at


Vacant housing


Total housing units: 34,434

Occupied housing units: 32,207

Vacant housing units: 2,227 or 6.5 percent


Total housing units: 14,719

Occupied housing units: 12,843

Vacant housing units: 1,876 or 12.7 percent


Total housing units: 19,090

Occupied housing units: 16,961

Vacant housing units: 2,129 or 11.2 percent


Total housing units: 36,134

Occupied housing units: 32,344

Vacant housing units: 3,790 or 10.5 percent

Source: U.S. Census 2010

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
cretis16 wrote on March 25, 2013 at 8:03 am

Hmmmmmm....rumors that the State of Illinois is broke are false.

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 25, 2013 at 9:03 am

cretis16; You beat me to it.  The state is not "broke" when it is spending.  It is only "broke" when it is not paying it's debts, and stealing from it's retired employees.

zenseekercu wrote on March 25, 2013 at 2:03 pm

Sid, you hit that nail on the head.  Many years ago, when the state first authorized "borrowing" from the state pension fund, I saw red flags.  The truth is that the state representatives have pilfered through the money in the retirement accounts, and now cannot pay it back to honor their obligations.  Downright THEFT is what it really is.

The state is trying the bait & switch technique, blaming the unions and the workers for their own crime of misappropriation.  My personal feeling is that the state should do without some of their funding to other programs, and replace the monies in the pension fund that were STOLEN.

As a disclaimer, I am not a state employee or retiree, and no one in my family is, either. 

Himiko wrote on March 25, 2013 at 3:03 pm

Zen and Sid - thank you SO SO much for your support. It seems like the only people who care about what's happening with the state pensions are the people who work there, and everyone who doesn't work there doesn't care that there's been a contract broken that people had been planning their financial life around.

I'm a 40something University employee who isn't eligible for Social Security, obviously doesn't get any kind of 401K matching from the University that all the financial experts' articles tell you to calculate into your retirement (hard to do when it's not provided), and I've been at the University for so many years that I can't afford to start over in the Social Security system. (I was just two quarters away from having Social Security benefits when I moved from my former priavte sector job to the University. I was nervous at the time. It looks like I should've been a lot more nervous.)

I started the University because I love education, I wanted to make a difference in the future, I knew I was giving up salary by not staying in the private sector and moved because I wanted to do something I loved that was good for the future instead of just something to make a CEO somewhere rich.

Now I'm wondering if I'm ever going to be able to retire at all, through no fault of my own - I've been putting money from my paycheck in for fifteen years now, and I have no idea whether I'll even get that back, let alone what the state theoretically owes me. (Or several thousand dollars from the dental system that we have to pay up front and hope that someday, maybe, we'll get paid back part of it.)

And I know there are thousands and thousands of us in this same boat. But because we're "government employees" in education, we seem to automatically be defined as "part of the problem" by most of the rest of the country.

It's really rare to see someone who's not a University employee say up front that they understand the position we're in and support us, and I'm really grateful for it. Thank you so much.