Carle exemption felt in government budgets

Carle exemption felt in government budgets

URBANA — With an economy in recovery, the budget outlook in Urbana has not improved much — particularly as a new exemption for $68 million worth of previously taxable Carle properties goes into effect.

Interim Comptroller Bill DeJarnette delivered his analysis to the Urbana City Council this week, not long after word began spreading that the Illinois Department of Revenue granted tax-exempt status to Carle's properties under new legislation approved last year.

More details will emerge in coming weeks about how local governments will deal with the expected drop-off in revenue — "the Carle effect," as DeJarnette called it. July starts a new budget year, and local agencies will use the next two months to finalize the details of their spending plans.

About $61 million worth of Carle property lies in Urbana, and it represented about 10.7 percent of all the city's taxable properties in 2012, when the city reported a total assessment of $569 million.

Now that the Carle chunk will be knocked off the tax rolls for this year — and property assessments continue to decrease anyway — DeJarnette is estimating Urbana's taxable property value will drop to $500 million next year. The money that area taxing bodies expected to collect from Carle will not be collected this year.

Government officials are predicting that other taxpayers are going to have to pick up the bill for Carle — DeJarnette estimated this week that the total property tax rate for people living in Urbana could top $10 per $100 of assessed value next year, up from the current $9.37 rate.

That rate has risen during the past two years anyway, from $8.85 in 2011. Most of the increase between 2011 and 2012 went to the Urbana school district, which accounts for more than half of property owners' tax bills. Property taxes are payable the year after a public body sets its tax levy.

But Urbana Alderwoman Diane Marlin, D-Ward 7, said she's not ready to call this a permanent change, yet. She hopes state leaders take another look at the legislation they passed last year to make the Carle exemption possible.

"At this point, I would like the state Legislature and the governor to revisit this entire legislation," Marlin said. "They need to fix this. I'm not sure they understood the consequences for some small cities like ours with a regional medical center."

Senate Bill 2194 made health centers exempt if they can show their "charity care" exceeds their property tax payment. Marlin thinks the definition of what is charitable is too broad.

But for the next year, at least, the city will need to adjust its budget.

"We're going to have to look at our ways we can save and we may have to look at ways to make up the revenue loss," Marlin said. "We haven't even started that discussion yet."

For the city, "the Carle effect" is just one variable, DeJarnette said. Urbana schools will take a multimillion-dollar hit and will be more profoundly affected than the city.

Other taxing bodies operate solely on property tax revenues. Cunningham Township, for example, expects to take a $131,613 hit — more than 10 percent of its budget.

Township government is statutorily required to provide "general assistance" welfare to the neediest of its residents and cannot cut there.

"We can't not provide benefits," said Cunningham Township Supervisor Carol Elliott. "We're really hoping that the caseload issues we've had will go down a little bit when the Affordable Care Act goes into effect."

Township cuts would have to come from administration costs in the supervisor's and the assessor's offices, and potentially lowering the $100,000 amount that it contributes to local nonprofit social service agencies.

"Social service funding is often the first place to cut just because it's not something we're mandated to do, even though we've done it for years and years and years," Elliott said. "It's really the only place where we have extra money."

Carle's is a big chunk of cash that will not be collected in the first year of the exemption — roughly $6 million throughout Champaign County, including more than $3 million for the Urbana school district alone and probably $824,100 for the city — but only one item on a list of budget problems officials expect to encounter.

"It's not a major thing" for the city, DeJarnette said. "It's just one more variable when you look at insurance rates climbing at exorbitant rates and a number of other things."

Outside of property taxes, major sources of city revenue are beginning to improve. Sales tax revenues jumped 5 percent between 2011 and 2012, to just more than $8.3 million. But city officials are only expecting it to rise another 0.5 percent this year.

That would not be enough to return sales tax revenues to where they were in 2008, when the city collected nearly $8.5 million.

"Our revenues are improving, but they're still at the 2007 level," DeJarnette said. "Clearly, any revenue like that just has an operational impact."

City officials are expecting a 2.5 percent increase in income tax revenues this year after an 11 percent jump in 2012. That assumes that the state does not cut the amount of income tax revenue it shares with local government — a plan that Gov. Pat Quinn has tossed around.

Overall, DeJarnette said, the city is in a struggle to get revenues back to where they were just before the recession took hold in 2008, especially as the cost of employee health care and retirement benefits continues to rise.

"Just to stay even costs a lot of money," DeJarnette said.

Sections (2):News, Local

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

ROB McCOLLEY wrote on April 25, 2013 at 7:04 am
Profile Picture

The 1,800 pensioners who voted for Laurel Prussing got just what they wanted: a fellow pensioner.


Pensioners strive to stretch a fixed income. They don't seek new sources of revenue. Frankly, they don't know how.


Urbana has a tax-base of government employees, largely recession-proof, who spend their money in Champaign.


mrseeu2 wrote on April 25, 2013 at 8:04 am

Rob, you're exactly right without growth, the people of Urbana will continue to see their property taxes increase.  The majority of the people who live in Urbana, shop and eat in Champaign because of the lack of such facilities in Urbana.  In  Bloomington-Normal both cities strive for growth, thereby both cities are growing and thriving.  In Champaign-Urbana only Champaign is growing because the mind set of the Urbana leadership is to keep Urbana a bedroom community.  What city the size of Urbana doesn't have a chain fast casual restaurant.  Even Savoy has a Buffalo wild wings and an Applebees. Savoy will one day overtake Urbana in total population and Urbana will be regulated to be just a small town afterthought.

Sid Saltfork wrote on April 25, 2013 at 10:04 am

Two cities with two police departments, two fire departments, two park districts, two school districts, two public works departments, and one street dividing them.  It does not make much sense; but it will remain that way.

cretis16 wrote on April 25, 2013 at 12:04 pm

Right on the money's a city of giverment employees, who continue to fleece the taxpayers to support their freebies. Oh wait, I forgot...once that new drainage ditch walkway gets completed, we're going to have all kinds of new businesses to make up for this loss. One thing is for certain....we're sure not gonna cut any services or spending.

EL YATIRI wrote on April 25, 2013 at 1:04 pm
Profile Picture

Indeed, doesn't make sense from any point of view.  Change won't come from the politicians and their supporters.

jmb wrote on April 25, 2013 at 10:04 am

No problem here. Think I'll just drop my health insurance to cover the cost of my increased property taxes and hit the Carle emergency room if I get sick. After all, with this huge windfall in property tax savings Carle will have plenty of cash to cover my health care costs. Hope my doctor doesn't have to trade in his Mercedes for a Caddy or some other inferior vehicle.


the world lacks common sense wrote on April 25, 2013 at 7:04 pm

Lets not forget the millions of dollars of free or discounted care Carle provides under their Community Care program. And before anyone complains about the addition they are building, keep in mind Carle is building it to accomodate the patients. The hospital is always at full capacity. The non urgent ones were at times treated in the hallway due to room shortage, and complained. They address the issue and still get complaints. Coming into the ER when its not needed only makes you suffer, longer wait and higher bill. Unless you qualify for Community Care you will be paying the bill or you will going to collection. While you are casting Carle as the enemy you should be thankful to have such an amazing medical facility here to treat you.

esotiro2 wrote on April 25, 2013 at 9:04 pm

Brilliantly stated!

primeyears wrote on April 25, 2013 at 9:04 pm

Don't support Carle? You're more than welcome to go to Provena.

ajbuckle wrote on April 29, 2013 at 9:04 am

Urbana has built itself a socialist paradise, and now everybody has to live with the consequences.  Good luck with your $10 per $100 of assessed value!  


No new economic development will occur under that tax regime.  Not that anybody was all that interested in your high crime and horrid schools to begin with.