Bill raising speed limit goes to governor

SPRINGFIELD -- The speed limit on interstate highways in most of downstate Illinois would increase from 65 to 70 mph under legislation overwhelmingly approved by the House Wednesday.

The House vote was 85-30, with nearly all Downstate state representatives voting in favor. Only Reps. Dan Brady, R-Bloomington, and Don Moffitt, R-Galesburg, voted no.

A month ago, the Senate approved the measure, 41-6.

The large majorities in both chambers suggest that a potential gubernatorial veto of SB 2356 would be easily overridden.

Both the Illinois State Police and Gov. Pat Quinn's Transportation Department director have spoken out against the higher speed limit. Quinn spokesman Dave Blanchette said only that the governor "will carefully review the bill when it reaches his desk and then make a decision."

The speed limit on all interstate highways outside of Cook, DuPage, Lake, Kane, McHenry and Will counties would increase to 70 mph under the bill.

Thirty-four other states already have speed limits of 70 mph or greater.

"From the top to the bottom of our state is 430 miles," said Rep. Deborah Mell, D-Chicago. "If we're driving 65 it take 6.6 hours to get there. If we're driving 70 it takes 6.1 It's not a huge saving and I think we've got to think if it's worth it balancing safety versus getting there just a few minutes faster."

"Is it really that important? We believe in saving human lives," said Rep. Monique Davis, D-Chicago.

But the bill's sponsor, Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Red Bud, said studies in Colorado and California "have shown that fatalities and injury crashes are decreased in those states when the speed limit was raised from 65 to 70 because people used the interstates instead of two-lane highways. Those states have become safer with the raise in the speed limit."

Costello acknowledged that insurance companies were opposed to the speed limit increase but added, "insurance companies make money off of speeding tickets."

He said Illinois adopted the 65 mph speed limit in 1987.

"(19)89 was when air bags were mandated. Engineering, safety, cars nowadays are much, much safer than they were in 1987. They're designed to go faster." he argued.

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

787 wrote on May 22, 2013 at 3:05 pm

Is this the most important thing for our elected officials in Springfield to be concerned about?

No.

Shouldn't they be concerned about debt, pensions, jobs, the economy....

Just like the President.  He's concerned about everything *except* jobs and the economy.

Nice Davis wrote on May 22, 2013 at 3:05 pm

Just like how the Republicans in Congress are concerned about everything *except* governing!

Lostinspace wrote on May 22, 2013 at 3:05 pm

They need to get to Chicago faster.

Sid Saltfork wrote on May 22, 2013 at 4:05 pm

Your right.  Increasing the speed limit a whole 5 mph more to 70 mph means nothing when people are driving 80 to 85 mph.  This speed limit bill is just political grandstanding.  "Hug Your Dog Week" will be proclaimed soon.  Someone will have to be hired to call Quinn's dog for him before the news coverage on the proclaimation.

dw wrote on May 23, 2013 at 10:05 am

What it *will* do is make driving a sane, safe and economical speed even more dangerous:  the minimum speed on an Interstate is 45mph.  Raising the maximum speed to 70mph, with typical enforcement at +8 over the speed limit will result in folks driving 75-78 mph and a speed differential of 30 mph between the lowest legal speed and the most likely speed of traffic.  You set a speed limit of X, and an American driver is going to assume that X+5 will not get them stopped.

As Uhaul is fond of reminding their drivers, speed kills.  And as the wiser politicos have reminded us, there is very little gain.  The only way to arrive on time is to leave on time: you make up very little time by speeding, whether it's legal or not.  You also waste a lot of $$$ on gas.

You want faster state transit times?  Get that high speed rail underway.