County Board OKs $304,000 to fix courthouse

County Board OKs $304,000 to fix courthouse

URBANA -- Champaign County Board members Thursday night approved spending about $304,000 on repairs and maintenance to the exterior masonry walls at the downtown Urbana courthouse.

The board also approved rezoning a parcel at the Triumph Industrial Park subdivision, about a mile north of Urbana and west of U.S. 45, for a firearms sales store and indoor shooting range.

The proposed courthouse work includes repairing cracked bricks, repointing cracked and open mortar joints, grinding and sealing minor cracks in the sandstone masonry and installing expansion joints on the south and west sides of the historic old section of the courthouse. On the newer, east portion of the building, work includes more minor repairs, plus low-pressure spray cleaning and degreasing and the application of a water repellant to prevent future staining and masonry deterioration.

Funding for the work will come from a Court Construction Fund.

But approval Thursday night was not without controversy.

Several board members noted that the new courthouse was built in 2001 and a courthouse masonry stabilization project was undertaken just five years ago in 2008.

Stan James, the rural Rantoul Republican who chairs the board's facilities committee, said "the industry standard" for a warranty on a construction project is one year.

"We'll try our best to get a little better warranty but with any warranty if you're going to extend it out, you're going to pay for it," he said. "Warranties are only as good as the lawyers we have fighting for them."

But Urbana Democrat Lloyd Carter, who described himself as a small contractor, said, "The buildings that I grew up with, they lasted longer than four or five years. You've got to go back and look at some that lasted 30 or 40 years. There's something wrong here."

"I'm very torn about this vote because I think we defer maintenance on a lot of buildings except that courthouse, which is treated like a Taj," said Champaign Democrat Josh Hartke.

James argued that the building needs to be maintained.

"Five years from now that ground can shift or a storm can come through. I can't guarantee anything and I don't think anyone in this room can," said James. "I hear this all the time but it's like everything in life, either with children or your own home or anything else. We have a priority list but if an emergency comes up or something is really looking at us in the face, that list sometimes moves by the wayside and we've got to take care of what's here right now."

The board also approved the appointments of Dianne Hays of Champaign to the Champaign County Board of Review and Jennifer Putman of Urbana to the Urbana & Champaign Sanitary District board.

Of the 22 board members, two -- Democrat Rachel Schwartz and Republican Jon Schroeder -- were absent.


Sections (2):News, Local

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

ROB McCOLLEY wrote on May 24, 2013 at 8:05 am
Profile Picture

So, who keeps getting paid for doing crap work? I want names.


I also want a cut of the loot. Sounds like a gravy train.


I suppose we'll be buying a new clock tower next year, yes?

stan james wrote on May 24, 2013 at 9:05 am

ROB: Idon't know where you work or what kind of work you do. When things fail I sure hope you don't get blamed for doing crap work. Life has taught me that many things change and yes some do so because of poor workmanship. I would suggest you attend Board meetings to hear how items are discussed and all the conversation which leads to a discision about an item.

I use to sit in coffee shops thinking I had a better way of doing what I perceived those at the table weren't doing. Upon being elected to sit at the table, I learned there are  many different views on how items are to be completed.

I don't think anyone really wants to say they are paying for crap work, at least the folks I know. I know the majority of us voting on issues do so with the best interest of taxpayers in mind.

Rob, I would suggest you run for office and if elected you can show all how things can be better. You must be willing to participate to make changes.