Updated: Fire sprinkler proposal for new homes withdrawn

Updated: Fire sprinkler proposal for new homes withdrawn

SPRINGFIELD — Intense political pressure, including a letter from Senate President John Cullerton, Friday prompted the state fire marshal to withdraw a plan to require fire sprinkler systems in some buildings, including all new single-family homes built in the state.

The sprinkler plan, which is part of the 2012 edition of the National Fire Protection Association's Life Safety Code and was up for adoption in Illinois, also would have required retrofitting some existing buildings with sprinklers, including high-rises and areas used for gatherings of 100 or more, including churches, dance halls, nightclubs and any place with festival seating.

The proposal, which was to go before the Legislature's Joint Commission on Administrative Rules either this month or in September, was opposed by the city of Chicago, the Illinois Municipal League, the Illinois Homebuilders Association, the Illinois Realtors Association and a number of other groups.

Sen. Dale Righter, R-Mattoon, said he believed "it was going down anyway" at JCAR, of which he is a member.

"It's just not the right thing to do. I understand the approach that many are taking with regard to fire safety, but any time that we're discussing a new rule or regulation and promoting it on a safety basis, there's always another side," said Righter. "To establish a policy that is going to make it at least somewhat if not significantly more expensive to build a new home in the state that is last in new housing starts just doesn't make sense. And form a philosophical point of view it's an overreach.

"New homeowners have the ability to decide if they want to put a sprinkler system in or not. And they ought to be able to make that decision themselves."

The issue was to have been considered next week at a meeting of the Champaign County Board's environment and land use committee, where a sample resolution opposing the adoption of the rule was on the agenda.

State Fire Marshal Larry Matkaitis said he pulled the proposal Friday because it needed "additional refinement."

"We have received an unprecedented amount of public input and suggestions through emails, letters and public meetings," said Matkaitis. "In the course of this process, it's become clear that any proposed state rule needs additional refinement.

"Therefore today I am officially withdrawing the proposed rule before the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules to take into account substantial public comment and carefully re-examine this issue."

A public hearing on the proposal, scheduled for next Tuesday at the fire marshal's office in Springfield, also was canceled.

Cullerton sent a letter to Matkaitis, dated July 31, that urged him to withdraw the proposal. Cullerton said it was "unnecessary, unreasonable and it represents an inappropriate extension of the rulemaking authority" granted to the fire marshal.

He said the proposal "would further burden an already fragile homebuilding industry" and said it "would have disastrous financial implications for homeowners, condo associations, religious organizations and businesses throughout the state of Illinois, who will ultimately pay the price for these costly and unnecessary installations."

In suggesting that Matkaitis pull the proposal, Cullerton urged him to "explore other options for how you might best fulfill your commitment to protecting the life and property of the citizens of Illinois from fire and other dangers while working within the framework provided by the Fire Investigation Act."

Two area state senators commended Matkaitis' decision. Sen. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet, said it was "a victory for common sense," and Champaign Democrat Sen. Mike Frerichs, a former volunteer firefighter, commended him "for listening to many citizens' concerns and working to balance" public safety and economic concerns.

Not everyone, however, was opposed to the proposed rule.

The Northern Illinois Fire Sprinkler Advisory Board had noted that 91 Illinois communities, including Normal, already have fire sprinkler ordinances for single-family homes, and that California and Maryland have statewide requirements similar to those that had been suggested.

Tom Lia, the executive director of the board, also disputed estimates that sprinklers would add more than $10,000 to the cost of a 3,100 square foot house, saying that contractors "recently completed projected in Illinois and the cost averages $2.38 per sprinklered square foot."

That translates to about $7,400 for a 3,100-square-foot house that was fully sprinklered.

The fire marshal, in a graphics presentation made earlier this week, said that insurers offer 15 percent discounts for sprinklered homes.

And although the municipal league opposed the sprinkler requirement, Urbana Mayor Laurel Prussing said she thought the single-family home requirement "was an idea whose time has come."

"A fire is a terrible thing so I'm in favor of anything that's going to promote safety as long as it's reasonable," she said.

Champaign Mayor Don Gerard said the city council had not discussed the issue but was aware of it.

"I'm just happy that in my day job we're able to do these projects for safety," said Gerard, who is a facilities manager at the University of Illinois. "But I'm aware that it could be problematic to require this for new construction. Maybe this is something that could be incentivized instead of just mandated."


News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

787 wrote on August 02, 2013 at 12:08 pm

That would have been exactly what this state DOESN'T need right now.... more mandates to make things even more expensive.

And exactly which union group was this proposed legislation some sort of a payback for?

ROB McCOLLEY wrote on August 02, 2013 at 1:08 pm
Profile Picture

Probably not the firefighters' union.

787 wrote on August 02, 2013 at 9:08 pm

And, of course, Queen Laurel thinks that this is a great idea.

So, why doesn't Urbana pass this as a requirement to build a home in Urbana?   Then, what's left of the people who are actually still building homes in Urbana will finally bail out, and stop building any new homes in Urbana.  

An additional $3000-$5000 penalty to build a new home in Urbana.   It's a fantastic idea Laurel.... run with it!  Do it... please!!!

danrice56 wrote on August 03, 2013 at 8:08 am

Yeah, if there's a safety measure that could save lives, why require it? If nightclub and arena owners want to save some money, let em. Of course, the money the builders save, will be money that the taxpayers pay for fighting burning buildings, but screw it.

If realtors and builders need to save some money, let those inside the buildings burn.



Liz wrote on August 03, 2013 at 12:08 pm

It doesn't surprise me that chicago put a halt to this.  It seems they are the only ones that have a say about our State and how it is run.  Probably why this State is so broke and corrupt.  I'm sure some rich landlord payed somebody off.  Isn't that the way of the State and why Chicago is called the windy city.  Sprinkler systems save lives and property.  It only takes seconds for a fire to get out of control and with a system installed it has already gone off before the fire department gets there.  The cost of residential installation is about as much as carpeting your home, it also saves on your homeowners insurance.  This not only had an affect on new single-family homes but also existing high rise apartment buildings.  The rents that are charged by landlords these days is ridiculously high especially in Chicago.  As usual life safety takes a back seat.  Anyone looking to rent an apartment should try and find one with a sprinkler system installed, also ask the landlord for the inspection paperwork to make sure they are maintaining the system.