County board to seek electric aggregation bids

County board to seek electric aggregation bids

URBANA -- Champaign County Board members voted Thursday to seek new bids next month under the the county's electrical aggregation contract.

The county's sustainability coordinator said earlier this month that per kilowatt electricity prices are projected to be unusually low in September and that the new bids could result in substantial savings for the approximately 8,600 residential and small commercial customers in unincorporated Champaign County who have contracted for aggregated power.

The resolution was approved by a voice vote.

Also Thursday the board 19-3 voted to deny a rezoning for a controversial proposed airstrip on private property in southern Champaign County. The owner of the land, now zoned for conservation use, sought to have it zoned for agricultural use to permit a residential landing strip.

Only Democrats James Quisenberry and Ralph Langenheim and Republican Max Mitchell voted to allow the rezoning.

Dr. Philip W. Jones and Sarabeth Jones had sought the change to alllow a restricted landing area for airplanes and helicopters at the location near Illinois 130, just north of Villa Grove. But a number of adjacent property owners spoke out against the request, many citing safety concerns.

Meanwhile, some board members voiced displeasure with recent media reports about quality of care issues at the county nursing home.

"We are very focused on quality of care issues at the facility," nursing home manager Scott Gima told the board, adding that he would begin including a summary of quality of care measures in his quarterly reports to the county board.

And board members avoided a potential controversy by deferring a vote until later this year on a plan to spend approximately $180,000 on masonry repairs to the county courthouse. Both the original 1901 courthouse building and the 12-year-old addition need repairs. Board members said the work couldn't be done in the current fiscal year anyway.

All 22 board members were present at Thursday's meeting.

Sections (2):News, Local

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

pattsi wrote on August 22, 2013 at 11:08 pm

Actually, the project amount to be spent repairing the new and old sections of the courthouse is above $300,000.

Tom Kacich wrote on August 23, 2013 at 7:08 am
Profile Picture

Ms. Petrie, the budget amendment on Thursday night's agenda was for $179,000.

pattsi wrote on August 25, 2013 at 10:08 am

Indeed, tht is the amount for the budget amendment, but the article implies that this is the cost for the project. The cost is more. The cost differential is already in the budget thus not part of the budget amendment.