Kraft: Expansion plan a 'game-changer'

Kraft: Expansion plan a 'game-changer'

CHAMPAIGN — City officials are moving forward with a request from Kraft Foods to subsidize its expansion plans with a $3.6 million assist in the purchase of the former AC Humko site.

Kraft officials told city council members this week that they cannot guarantee a new 730,000-square-foot warehouse on the site of the former AC Humko plant would bring more jobs and product lines to the plant in Champaign, but the expansion is a "game-changer."

City council members gave the initial OK on Tuesday night to create a new tax increment financing district to provide a $3.6 million subsidy for the $38 million project. City officials will now spend the next few months developing a formal agreement with Kraft and bringing the proposal before a review board.

A final version could be on city council members' desks by December. Kraft officials said this week that, ideally, they would like to have the new warehouse operational by the end of 2014.

The Champaign Kraft plant is the largest food production facility in the United States but is landlocked and has no capacity to add production lines, according to a memo to the city council. It generates over $2.5 billion annually in revenue, ships on average 1.5 billion gross pounds per day on 130 trucks, and employs about 1,200 people.

The Champaign plant, however, has to compete internally with 37 other Kraft plants for new product lines when the corporation looks to expand. Champaign plant manager Christine Bense said the new warehouse will make the local facility more attractive to its corporate leaders.

"In our minds, this is the game-changer for Champaign," Bense said. "This project is the thing that, for us, unlocks potential that we don't have today."

By contrast, the former AC Humko site has significantly declined in value since it closed in 2008, when its assessed value was $1.58 million. This year's assessment puts it at $661,490.

Kraft officials say they will end up paying more than $4 million more for the site than they normally would as its previous owners look to recoup the large costs of environmental cleanup. That is the primary reason they are seeking a city subsidy.

Bruce Knight, the city's director of planning and development, said Kraft is the only group that has approached the city about redeveloping the AC Humko site.

"This is going to be a challenging property to redevelop no matter what, and we think it makes sense to partner with one of our largest employers to help complete a project that then opens up the potential for new product lines, new employment, new economic activity in the existing plant," Knight said. "And, more importantly, I think solidifies Kraft's future at this location for years to come."

City council members were very supportive of the plan in their comments before an 8-0 straw poll. Council member Vic McIntosh pointed out that this may be the only opportunity to redevelop what is now a vacant property.

"We're not going to get a Phillips 66 to pay $4.3 million to put a filling station in there," McIntosh said. "This is an ideal use for this."

Council member Will Kyles, who works in the plant and abstained from the vote, said the economic impact of the company that employs 1,200 locally goes beyond the borders of the plant's property.

"The impact of Kraft's success not only just affects that company. ... It also impacts our local businesses and the region as a whole," Kyles said.

A tax increment financing district freezes the amount of property taxes various taxing bodies receive from property within the district at the assessed value at the time the district is created.

As the property value increases because of new construction or building improvement, all property taxes exceeding that initial value — the "tax increment" — is put into a special fund controlled by the city. The money from the fund must be used to pay for infrastructure and other improvements in the district — in this case, assistance for Kraft in the redevelopment of the AC Humko site.

Because the tax increment comes from property tax revenues forgone by those other taxes bodies, non-city entities will end up paying for about $2.9 million of the $3.6 million subsidy. The remaining $700,000 in Kraft payments will be property tax increment that the city, too, must forgo.

In this particular case, Knight said the city plans to make payments back to the other taxing districts to "make them whole" with the property tax revenues they lost when AC Humko closed. That means that, while some of the money will go toward the Kraft plant, all the taxing bodies will actually receive more than what they get now.

When the tax increment financing district expires — after 12 years at the earliest — property tax billing would go back to normal, and all the taxing bodies would, theoretically, begin receiving revenues that wouldn't exist had the city never used the district to create the incentive for Kraft.

Knight said the city has shared its plans with the Champaign school district, which would be most affected by the tax increment financing district, and school officials have said their board supports the plan.

"I think they recognize the nature of this proposal is win-win," Knight said.

Sections (2):News, Local

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Kirsten wrote on September 04, 2013 at 9:09 pm

1.5 billion pounds a day on 130 trucks? Can that be correct? If so, that's a lotta mac n cheese on some sturdy vehicles.

Orbiter wrote on September 11, 2013 at 10:09 pm


Unfortunately, Kirsten, irresponsible reporter Patrick Wade doesn't give a rats "tail" about reader comments, or he would have questioned/corrected the 1.5 Billion pounds falsehood for this article after my comment five days prior, in his previous article, which offered the same false information.

 Since the 1.5 Billion pounds is false, what else is false in the article?  The number of employees at Kraft?  The details of the real estate deal?  The financial cost to our community? Perhaps it really was this "memo" by Kraft that presented the falsehoods.  So what else in the memo is incorrect? Lies, lies, and more lies.


Lance Dixon wrote on September 04, 2013 at 11:09 pm

Anyone else tired of big corporations holding local governments hostage by demanding tax breaks? My guess is that there aren't a lot of other Kraft plants in the country with a giant vacancy next door just begging for expansion. They would probably expand without our tax dollars. Our schools are desperate for cash. We should demand tax dollars from corporate America. Instead, corporate America is sapping the money away from government (and the civic agencies that work for the common good of our community). 

I say forget you, Kraft. Buy your own darn land with your own darn money! (Pardon the euphemisms).