Students want to end UI investment in coal

Students want to end UI investment in coal

URBANA — Students voting in an online campus referendum this week overwhelmingly supported a move to end University of Illinois investments in coal.

The activist group UIUC Beyond Coal gathered 4,238 signatures to place a question before students in an online ballot asking: "Do you support the University of Illinois' endowment removing investments in coal by the year 2017?"

A total of 2,020 students voted, or about 4.6 percent of the approximately 43,400 eligible, according to the Student Election Commission. Almost 86 percent, or 1,730 voted yes, and 290 voted no.

"This victory is a huge milestone for our campaign," UIUC Beyond Coal Co-President Drew O'Bryan, said in a release. "It shows the support we have from the student body and gives us the collective voice of thousands of supporters as we move forward."

UI officials have said the university has no direct investments in coal companies, but it's not ready to make any changes to its investment policy.

"The university has a fiduciary responsibility to the state and all of the constituents of the university, and I don't anticipate that there would be a change in the university's policy," spokesman Tom Hardy said Friday.

The university's endowment, valued at $1.7 billion, is invested for long-term use and provides income for scholarships, professorships and other programs.

The Beyond Coal group said the proposals would remove UI investments from 15 major coal-mining and coal utility companies.

UI officials say the university has no direct investments in those companies and at most about $8 million invested indirectly through stock market index funds.

The UI's active endowment is about $375 million, and no more than 1 percent to 2 percent of that is invested in those companies through index funds, which are tied to general stock market performance, officials said.

The rest of the UI's $1.7 billion endowment is managed by the UI Foundation, which also has no direct investments in coal, though it may also have some indirectly invested through index or managed funds, officials said.

The referendum follows a similar resolution passed by the Illinois Student Senate a year ago. Both are advisory; divestment would have to be approved by UI trustees.

O'Bryan said the group will continue to press trustees for change.

The UIUC Beyond Coal divestment campaign began in fall 2011, after the university agreed to stop using coal at the Abbott Power Plant by 2017. It was among the first divestment campaigns in the country, a movement that now includes more than 300 universities, according to the group.

Beyond Coal argues that mining coal destroys natural landscapes and takes farmland out of production, and that combustion of coal in power plants affects human health and contributes to global warming.

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

yates wrote on November 16, 2013 at 10:11 am

I'm sure Obama is happy that his young revolutionaries support the destruction of his states most abundant energy resource. And I bet parents will love it when so called green energy costs are reflected in the price of their education too.

jdmac44 wrote on November 16, 2013 at 10:11 am

Coal is nasty stuff.  It's also the reason that we have the modern civilization we do and the ability to feed seven billion people.  Work on making your alternatives work (e.g. supporting a considerable portion of the population) without subsidies first, then worry about getting rid of coal.

Jam wrote on November 16, 2013 at 12:11 pm

This is a misguided effort.  Coal is a ready resource for us and the industry employs many people. 

Sid Saltfork wrote on November 16, 2013 at 1:11 pm

You have to wonder how many of the commenters ever worked in a coal mine, or lived around one.  Was their water source ever contaminated by the coal industry?  Coal mine companies, and their owners seem to slip away once the supply is depleted.  The area residents, and government enities are left to clean up the mess. Ever wonder why coal miners unionize?  Ever heard of Harlan County, Kentucky?  

Oh yes, let's bring coal companies to Champaign County.  Don't worry about the water, and the slush pools.  Maybe, the pro-coal commenters can get jobs as miners instead of bashing an educated group like college students.  Of course, the pro-coal commenters don't believe in global warming either.  Illinois coal is high in sulfur content.  The people living, and working in a proximatity to the U. of I. power plant  had their vehicles' paint eaten away after a misty day.  The pro-coal commenters must believe that all of those vehicles drove down the same really recently oiled road on the way home in November.  They must think that the videos of Bejing, China were faked this year also.