Ex-Illini in court today on weapons charges

Ex-Illini in court today on weapons charges

Sinclair's attorneys plan to move for dismissal, say he'd have been protected by concealed-carry law

URBANA — Felony weapons charges against Matt Sinclair should be dismissed because they violate his Second Amendment rights, his attorneys plan to argue today in court.

Sinclair, 31, a former University of Illinois football player and staff member, was arrested on Nov. 23 after a motorist saw him point a gun at another vehicle on Interstate 74 in Urbana.

He was charged with three felonies — aggravated unlawful use of a weapon, not having a valid concealed-carry permit and using the gun in the commission of a misdemeanor. Those charges are Class 4 felonies punishable by one to three years in prison.

Sinclair's attorneys, Roger B. Webber and J. Steven Beckett, have argued in court documents that a portion of the law cited for their client's arrest is unconstitutional. They say that Sinclair should be protected under the state's recently passed concealed-carry law.

At issue is the timeline: Illinois passed concealed-carry in July 2013 but didn't begin issuing permits until earlier this month.

Sinclair's attorneys argue that had he had a concealed-carry permit at the time of his arrest, his actions would not be criminal. But in November, state police were still developing procedures to qualify for a permit.

The attorneys argue that Sinclair now meets most of the criteria to receive a permit under Illinois law. The one exception: He did not complete the required 16 hours of specified firearms training.

In the motion to dismiss, Sinclair's attorneys write "the right to possess and bear arms outside of the home ... is protected under the 2nd and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States and corollary provisions of the Illinois State Constitution."

Judge Heidi Ladd is scheduled to consider the motions at 2:30 p.m. today at the Champaign County Courthouse.

Sinclair was arrested around 4 p.m. Nov. 23 after a driver behind him saw him point the gun out the window of the pickup truck he was driving. The witness, Marin Lowder, called 911.

In an interview with The News-Gazette three days later, she described the scene as being like something out of a "bad thriller movie."

"I slammed on my brakes and said 'I have to call 911,' and that's what I did," she said. "You don't know, if he does shoot, what are we going to do? Everything is running through your mind."

Sinclair was on his way back from West Lafayette, Ind., where hours earlier Illinois had beaten Purdue to end a 20-game Big Ten losing streak. According to the police report, he said he had the gun with him for protection and was joking when he pointed it at the SUV that had co-workers in it.

Police pulled over Sinclair near Green Street after he exited at Lincoln Avenue, according to the report. They found an unloaded gun in the center console of his pickup truck, a magazine loaded with 16 rounds of ammunition in the driver's side door pocket and a set of brass knuckles.

In addition to the three Class 4 felonies, Sinclair was also charged with a misdemeanor for possessing brass knuckles.

At the time of his arrest, the former UI linebacker was just seven months into an $80,000-a-year job as assistant director of player personnel and relations.

On Nov. 24, he was placed on administrative leave. On Feb. 28, UI football coach Tim Beckman announced that Sinclar had resigned, adding, "He has to be a little more mature."

Then, a week ago, Beckman announced that former Illini quarterback Juice Williams had been hired as the team's new director of alumni and former player relations.


NOV. 23: UI football staffer Matt Sinclair arrested on 3 gun charges, all felonies.

DEC. 3: Sinclair pleads not guilty to all charges.

FEB. 28: UI football coach Tim Beckman announces Sinclair's resignation.

MARCH 24: Sinclair due before Judge Heidi Ladd at the Champaign County Courthouse.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
nschne393 wrote on March 24, 2014 at 8:03 am

I don't think the "concealed" part of concealed carry includes pointing the gun outside the window driving down the interstate.  The witness that saw the gun's name isn't Clark Kent.  He wouldn't have seen it if the gun had been properly concealed.  It's crock defenses like this that make honest, law-abiding citizens using concealed carry look like extremists.

illinikev04 wrote on March 24, 2014 at 11:03 am

My worst fear is that he will walk away from this with a slap on the wrist like the other times he has been in trouble with local police.  I would bet there is some back room dealing going on here and he will end up back with the UI program in one capacity or another, and we will just sit back and take it as usual.  I think we would be more willing deal with this poor behavior if the team was at least WINNING!!! 

Huh wrote on March 24, 2014 at 2:03 pm

It's a good thing she called 911 then, because now it is illegal for her to use a cell phone in her vehicle on the road. I think they would have given her a stiffer penalty than this thug is going to recieve.

Brass knuckles, pointing loaded gun on the interstate, he's quite the sweetheart his lawyer portrays him as.

thesimpleman wrote on March 24, 2014 at 3:03 pm

what so what they are saying is this is ok.It is my right to point a gun at someone while driving down the interstate at a high rate of speed.

Another lost illini player go figure


alabaster jones 71 wrote on March 24, 2014 at 10:03 pm
Profile Picture

Just when we thought this guy couldn't make more of a jackass out of himself, he surprises us further.

Bulldogmojo wrote on March 27, 2014 at 2:03 pm

The Chicago leader of the Latin Kings "Technically" was eligible for a concealed carry permit but was denied because someone at the ISP was on the ball.

This guy's lawyers are throwing spaghetti at the wall. What's next the affluenza card?


rsp wrote on March 27, 2014 at 6:03 pm

That's the question I can't seem to get people to take seriously. Why is it a "given" that these people would have received a concealed carry permit after they get in trouble? "So-and-so would have had the proper permit but the state wasn't issuing them yet so he couldn't comply". But they didn't have to go through that process so isn't it possible that's a false statement? Is one guaranteed a concealed carry permit? If one is guaranteed it, why do you need it? Because everyone could just stick a gun in there pocket and go.

Danno wrote on March 29, 2014 at 6:03 pm

His Liability Insurer is...State Farm?