Study: Spalding site would boost price tag

Study: Spalding site would boost price tag

CHAMPAIGN — Consulting engineers estimate the cost of building a new Central High School in the Spalding Park area will be $45.8 million more than building near Interstate Drive in north Champaign.

Where should Central be built? Tell Tom Kacich here 

The engineers attribute the additional costs at Spalding Park to the price of acquiring and demolishing the former Judah Christian School and nearby homes, and building a taller school building, along with a parking deck and underground stormwater detention vault.

Personnel from Gorski Reifsteck and DLR Group presented the results of their studies of the two alternative sites at a community meeting Tuesday night.

More than 90 people turned out at the Central High School library to take part in the meeting.

Jason Lembke, senior associate for DLR Group, said both options would call for a high school accommodating 1,700 students.

While the site near the intersection of Interstate Drive and Neil Street could be built in its entirety in a single phase, the Spalding Park site would likely have to be developed in two phases.

Construction of the first phase would take place on property already owned by the school district, Champaign Park District and current Judah Christian School.

Construction of phase two would take place on properties yet to be acquired by the district, including some homes and possibly some commercial spaces.

If the school board opts to build along Interstate Drive, the new high school would feature 1,225 parking spaces, including 925 spaces dedicated for football games and other events.

Preliminary plans presented Tuesday night show the north side of the property featuring two soccer fields, a practice field, two baseball diamonds, two softball diamonds and eight tennis courts.

The north end of the property would also include space for on-site stormwater detention.

A combination football/track facility would be constructed on the east side of the site, with a three-story high school built on the south side.

If the school board opts for the Spalding Park site, two soccer fields and eight tennis courts would be built on the site of homes and businesses north of Judah Christian School.

Instead of two baseball and softball fields, single baseball and softball diamonds would be built roughly where Judah Christian now sits.

A four-story high school building would be built east of Harris Avenue because less land is available than with the Interstate Drive option.

East of the high school would be a combination football/track facility and a four-story parking deck featuring 625 parking spaces.

The school district would need to get a variance from the city to have only 625 parking spaces.

Dennis Bane, principal of DLR Group, said the Spalding Park site would cost $45.8 million more, including $24 million for the site itself and $21.8 million for the buildings.

Bane said the additional money would be needed to acquire homes and some commercial buildings and to demolish the Judah Christian building.

He said building construction costs would be 15 percent more for the four-story school building and four-story parking deck, as compared with the three-story building and ground-level parking proposed for Interstate Drive.

In addition, Bane said stormwater at Spalding Park would be retained underground in a concrete vault, possibly under the football field.

The school district still has a way to go before it builds a new high school at either location. Its biggest hurdle may be voters, who in November would need to approve a ballot question for a substantial property-tax hike to pay for a new Central High School and a renovated Centennial High School.

In April, school officials told The News-Gazette a brand-new Central at Interstate Drive would run the district about $80 million, according to "ballpark figures" from earlier studies the district has commissioned. A revamped Centennial could cost between $35 and $40 million.

"There are no perfect sites," said Superintendent Judy Wiegand. "There will be pros and cons to either site."

An electronic poll of 68 participants at Tuesday's meeting showed 78 percent preferred the Interstate Drive option, with 22 percent preferring to build at Spalding Park.

Lembke said it will take another seven to 10 days before the results of a telephone poll of registered voters in the district will be known.

Sections (2):News, Local

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

pattsi wrote on June 18, 2014 at 1:06 pm

A major problem with any of the cost numbers being batted around, thuS becoming institutionalized, is the fact that there are no externalities--in other words costs to the community and citizens, being included in the numbers or discussion. There has been a slight nod to a transportation study that has been very narrow and time centered to now, not on a longer timeline. In other words a site south of I-74 might have an initial higher cost, than bare open land north of I-74. In the long run this just may not be the case--loss of more important farm land as sprawl is generated by HS on the perimeter, increase MTD taxes, increase of park district taxes, increase of roads and thus maintenance, more schools needing to be build as is presently planned for the 80 acres, etc. North of I-74 will generate growth and then all of the accompanying infrastructures.

justthefacts wrote on June 18, 2014 at 1:06 pm

The proposed school site north of I-74 will be developed whether or not a school is built there. It will not remain farmland, the MTD will serve that area in the future, and it will eventually become part of the the park district, the City of Champaign, etc. The "external costs" will be realized when the area is developed, be it for commercial, residential, or educational use. It may or may not be the best site for a new high school but the "external costs" of development should not be attributed to the school since they will occur regardless of the school site decision.