Updated: Survey shows more support for north site than Spalding

Updated: Survey shows more support for north site than Spalding

A Champaign school district poll of 400 likely voters showed nearly half prefer a site north of Market Place Mall for a new Central High School.

Where should Central be built? Let Tom Kacich know here

And roughly half of the voters — depending on the amount — said they'd support a tax increase to pay for the project, if it was in their preferred location.

Here's the report from the survey firm.

In the 10-minute telephone survey conducted by the Kansas firm Patron Insight, 49 percent preferred the site at Neil Street and Interstate Drive and 38 percent favored a site that now includes Spalding Park and Judah Christian School.

A sizable percentage — 14 percent — said they didn't know which site they preferred. The results have a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percent.

Patron Insight initially conducted the survey over two weeks in late May, but district officials asked that it be extended and refined.

A "work in progress" report from that initial round found stronger support for the Spalding Park option — 42 percent vs. about 25 percent for various proposals using the Interstate Drive site.

But that poll included more complex questions that combined the Central High School project with proposals to replace Dr. Howard Elementary School and other projects, and officials felt the results weren't clear.

Factors influencing voters choices in the final poll? Cost, space, ease of construction and transportation concerns.

Respondents were asked to share a reason for their preference, or what information they'd need to make a choice.

Those who chose the Interstate Drive site said it would be "less expensive" (63 people), had "lots of room for facilities and growth" (41 people) and would allow construction to begin immediately (35 people).

Those who favored Spalding Park liked the fact that it was "centrally located" (82 people) and said it would require less busing because it's "closer to where the students are" (35 people).

Of those who didn't name a preference, 22 said they didn't like either location and 19 said they wanted just one high school.

"While each group has some compelling reasons for its preferences, statistically speaking, the Interstate Drive/Neil Street group has the meaningful edge," said a report prepared by Patron for Monday night's school board meeting.

An earlier poll of faculty and staff showed employees favored the Interstate Drive site by a 61 percent to 39 percent margin.

The public poll presented voters with three tax-increase scenarios to pay for the new high school:

— 47 percent said they would favor or strongly favor a tax increase of $160.58 annually per $100,000 of assessed value if the school were built in their preferred location.

— 52 percent said they would support a $128.47 tax increase, with the same stipulation.

— 56 percent said they would support a $96.35 tax increase, with the same stipulation.

District spokeswoman Stephanie Stuart said those increases would generate $150 million, $120 million or $90 million for the school district, respectively.

Cost estimates for the new school have ranged from $80 million when the Interstate Drive site was originally proposed to $125 million for the Spalding site. Officials have said it would cost about $19 million to replace Dr. Howard.

The earlier poll had asked voters about tax increases from $195 to $279 annually per $100,000 assessed home value.

Respondents in the final poll were 400 randomly selected head-of-household registered voters in the Champaign school district. They included 194 people who had voted in the past three November elections (2012, 2010 and 2008); the rest had voted in one or two.

The question wording

Here's how the question about the future site of Central High School was posed to phone survey respondents:

"As you may know, the school district is evaluating options to build a new Central High School in a new location. (Descriptions were rotated — meaning approximately half heard one first, while half heard the other one first — and the two descriptions were connected with 'The other location ...')

"One location being considered is located northeast of Interstate Drive and Neil Street. This location costs 5 and one-half million dollars for the land. It would be a large enough property to allow for the immediate construction of a comprehensive, 21st century school, with space for trade skill programming, band and athletic facilities, and with room to grow, as needed. This site is located on the perimeter of the city.

"One location being considered is located at Spalding Park, meaning it would be closer to the center of Champaign. If the high school was located here, it would be a multi-story, micro-urban campus. This location costs 25 million dollars for the land. It would require phasing in over time and the acquisition of homes to provide enough space.

"As you think about it today, which location would you prefer for the new Central High School, the Interstate Drive and Neil Street location, or the Spalding Park location?" (Descriptions were re-read, if requested.)

Sections (2):News, Local

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

rsp wrote on June 30, 2014 at 11:06 pm

If you phrase a question the right way, you can pretty much guarantee the way it's going to come out. Describe one part in a positive light, the other in a subtle negative light. When you do a preliminary poll you can find things that voters are bothered by or things they might like.

"One location being considered is located northeast of Interstate Drive and Neil Street. This location costs 5 and one-half million dollars for the land. It would be a large enough property to allow for the immediate construction of a comprehensive, 21st century school, with space for trade skill programming, band and athletic facilities, and with room to grow, as needed. This site is located on the perimeter of the city. One location being considered is located at Spalding Park, meaning it would be closer to the center of Champaign. If the high school was located here, it would be a multi-story, micro-urban campus. This location costs 25 million dollars for the land. It would require phasing in over time and the acquisition of homes to provide enough space. As you think about it today, which location would you prefer for the new Central High School, the Interstate Drive and Neil Street location, or the Spalding Park location?"
 

Micro--urban, just makes you think small doesn't it?

ROB McCOLLEY wrote on July 01, 2014 at 4:07 pm
Profile Picture

Push-polling for the site everyone hates. Way to go Unit 4.

 

I have some ideas:

 

Would you prefer the site that smells like raw sewage, or the one that smells like sea breezes?

 


Would you prefer the site where all the children grow up to be successful world leaders/olympic medalists, or the one that turns them into criminals and welfare recipients?

 

Choose one: the site that's popular with the cool crowd, or the nerdy site with the bad acne?

AreaMan wrote on July 01, 2014 at 9:07 am
Profile Picture

The traffic and distance of placing the high school at the far north end of town is a real concern for many. The studies that the school board is using are flawed, and will contribute to daily traffic gridlock if the high school is built there.

For instance, the traffic count of the high school was shown to not have a substantial impact, but they did not take into account future growth: what if we place a middle school north of town as well? There are not enough roads to accomodate the increasing levels of traffic to that part of town.

Secondly, the commute time analysis assumed that all traffic lights were green at all times. Of course traveling on north Prospect would be great if there were no red lights! Even in this utopian world with no red lights, average travel time is nearly doubled versus the current Central HS location.

I will not be supporting this growth at such an inconvenient location. You cannot place the burden and cost of this excessive infrastructure (extra travel time, additional roads, utilities, gasoline) on the taxpayers and parents, only to grow our community in an unsustainable fashion.

pattsi wrote on July 01, 2014 at 11:07 am

One can listen to a conversational exchange with Dan McCollum about the HS siting, recent phone survey, and additional proposed studies this morning on WDWS.  http://www.wdws.com/multimedia/podcast/penny-your-thoughts.html

A major point emphasized is the minimum considerations being given to the externalities and cost thereof if and when a site chosen outside the hub of the community will cost additionally to each and every tax payer, not just the amount of the bonds.

 

rsp wrote on July 01, 2014 at 4:07 pm

The first "confusing" survey supported the Spaulding site, so they had another survey with "careful wording" and this one says the Interstate Dr location. There has never been any discussion of how much either site would cost to maintain over the other. When they got the sales tax pushed through they promised not to ask for more money before 2015. To show they had integrity, and to give us a chance to see they would live up to their promises. It's 2014. They are trying to force this on us even if it's not the best thing for our community.

RexKallembach wrote on July 02, 2014 at 3:07 pm

Fortunately, the only survey that will matter is the eventual vote.  Based on my conversations with many informed citizens - survey says "no".

Commonsenseman wrote on July 06, 2014 at 10:07 am

Ridiculous skewed non scientific polling data, how many of those favoring property tax increases actaully own homes? totally biased questions designed to favor the  rural option.  Amazing how the school district is so excited to spend money they didnt earn for "two soccer fields, a practice field, two baseball diamonds, two softball diamonds and eight tennis courts." add to this track and football facilities, how about a helipad, bowling alley, olympic pool and imax theatre too.  Heres a suggestion, start over build a more fiscally responsible school, refurbish the real Central and maybe see if you can buy property next to it to expand the building/campus, while you are at  it how about firing the multiple 6 figure salary administrators you have and has anyone noticed the top leaderrship positions are all female, where are the men?