'That's Amtrak time'

'That's Amtrak time'

CHAMPAIGN — When Amy Van Rheeden travels with Amtrak, she always anticipates extra time to sit back, read a book and encounter train delays.

She's come to expect it as a frequent visitor to the Illinois Terminal in downtown Champaign.

"Earlier, I texted my aunt to tell her what time I would be arriving today," Van Rheeden said Thursday morning as she waited for the Chicago-bound train. "But I made sure to tell her: 'That's Amtrak time, so who knows?'"

It's been a tough two weeks for the railroad companies held responsible for the long delays and limited access local travelers have had to put up with:

— On Aug. 6, U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Gov. Pat Quinn announced they'd co-signed a letter to Amtrak's top executives, asking for more rail service on the popular Chicago-Champaign-Carbondale corridor.

Over the past eight years, they noted, there has been a 117 percent increase in ridership on Amtrak's trains through Champaign. The current three round-trips a day are no longer enough, they said.

— Two weeks later, Durbin traveled to Champaign to voice his concerns about "unacceptable" train delays, only this time in person. Wednesday's meeting with national and local officials focused on freight train interference with passenger trains, which Durbin said are the reason the local Illini and Saluki lines had an on-time arrival rate of just 48.9 percent this fiscal year.

Durbin cast the blame on railway company Canadian National for not giving passenger trains preference on the tracks, as required by law.

"Late trains and unnecessary delays turn passengers away from Amtrak and can slow the incredible growth we have seen," Durbin said.

He didn't have to look far for a passenger to back his claim.

Carly Smith, an international graduate student at the University of Illinois, said she has taken the Amtrak train from Champaign to Chicago over 25 times the past six years. She has experienced plenty of delays but none lasting longer than an hour, she said.

Calling delays "definitely" normal, Smith said she always carves out at least half a day to travel to Chicago on Amtrak, just so she has some wiggle room if things go wrong.

"I mainly travel to Chicago for a doctor's appointment and I would never make the appointment for right when I needed to get (there)," she said.

Monticello's Dwaine Keller rides Amtrak to go to Cubs games and visit his daughter. He remains an Amtrak fan but has been frequently frustrated by the freight train issue.

"It's kind of comical: the delays where one has to wait for the freight trains are pretty predictable. They seem kind of built in," Keller said. "It's so predictable that I tell my wife to pick me up 15 minutes late."

Still, the long waits are enough to make him change his routine but not his preferred mode of travel.

As Van Rheeden put it, "Beats driving."

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

EdRyan wrote on August 22, 2014 at 7:08 am

Being able to take an early morning train to Chicago would be a great thing.  Getting back is never a problem, but if you want to go up by train for business in the morning it means an overnight trip.  That or face the traffic and parking nightmare in the city or stop, park and take the Metra in from Manhattan.

ROB McCOLLEY wrote on August 22, 2014 at 12:08 pm
Profile Picture

Greyhound Express is faster, cheaper, more reliable, has fewer stops (none) and more departures, and the wi-fi works. 

bkort1 wrote on August 22, 2014 at 6:08 pm

I used to ride Greyhound and MegaBus.  I switched to Amtrak.  Reasons:

 - Amtrak seats are 10 times more comfortable.

 - If a baby cries for an hour, you can move to another car.

 - Amtrak has wifi.

 - The scenery along the way is a lot better.

 - On most routes, pricing is better than the buses (e.g. Chicago to St. Louis).

 Having said that, on some routes:

 - It's cheaper (e.g. Chicago to Milwaukee)

 - Buses are much faster on some routes (e.g. Chicago to Indianapolis).

Still, I think anyone who has a choice and has tried all of them will choose Amtrak MOST of the time.

kurtbox1 wrote on August 22, 2014 at 2:08 pm

Seems odd to blame the railroad for Amtrack delays, pretty sure that Amtrack doesn't own or maintain the track.  Why do they get to have special treatment. Maybe they should put in there own Rail.

bkort1 wrote on August 22, 2014 at 6:08 pm

Back in 1971 the railroads agreed to let Amtrak run on routes that previously had rail service.  They agreed to provide passenger trains priority over freight.  Of course they don't want to do that, but that's the deal they made.

BTW, Amtrak does own some of it's own rail - the Northeast Corridor, Michigan and pieces in various other places.