April ballot to have two questions on nursing home

April ballot to have two questions on nursing home

URBANA — Champaign County voters will face two county-board-generated questions on the April 4 ballot: whether they would favor selling or disposing of the financially troubled county nursing home and whether they'd favor a higher property-tax rate to support its continued operation.

The special county board meeting Tuesday night on nursing-home issues ran for more than four hours.

The board initially voted 11-9 not to put the sale or disposal of the nursing home on the April 4 ballot. The majority included 11 of the board's 12 Democrats — all except former Chairwoman Pattsi Petrie. Two of the board's 10 Republicans, Diane Michaels and John Jay, were absent.

But later, board Chairman C. Pius Weibel, a Champaign Democrat, moved to reconsider the original vote. On that second try, it passed, 12-8.

Even if voters favor selling the nursing home, Democrats noted, county board members would have to approve the issue — and an extraordinary majority of the board, 15 votes, would be required.

The board also voted down, 20-0, a proposal to impose a half-cent sales tax for all county facilities improvements, including the nursing home. A similar tax-increase question was defeated by the county's voters in November by 70 percent to 30 percent.

Before the full board meeting, Champaign Democrat Josh Hartke told his party's caucus that a number of groups — the Champaign County Health Care Consumers, North End Breakfast Club, Rep. Carol Ammons' campaign, Build Programs Not Jails and the county's Young Democrats — have already pledged to support a property-tax increase but would oppose the sales tax.

The board then voted on a 12-8 party-line roll call to ask voters for an increase in property taxes, from the existing 3.25-cent rate to nearly 10 cents per $100 of assessed valuation.

If OK'd by voters, the cost to a taxpayer with a home with a market value of $150,000 would be about $30 a year, said county Administrator Rick Snider. The higher tax rate would yield about $2.5 million annually, Snider said.

Board members said they hoped the revenue could be used on deferred maintenance, to build up a cash balance and to pay down what is currently a $4 million bill backlog.

"Right out here are a number of activists who are waiting to work for this referendum," Hartke said, nodding toward the audience.

But Champaign Republican Jon Rector predicted, "People don't want taxes raised right now."

Board members said voters needed a choice at the April 4 vote.

"All we're trying to do here is let the voters say what they want to do," said Ogden-area Republican Stan Harper.

"We have to give the voters a choice on this, because without the choice, we're denying them a voice," said Rantoul Republican Jack Anderson.

"We need to go to the public and find out, are they ready to help us get more money to sustain that home or not. And if they say no, then we have no options, and I don't like the fact that we have no options," said Petrie, a Champaign Democrat. "I don't want to see that home sold or disposed of, but we're painting ourselves into a corner if we don't put that option out there and hear from the public."

County Treasurer Dan Welch reviewed past financial connections between the nursing home and the county's general fund and concluded that the nursing home is "a negative impact."

He said the county's dwindling fund balance isn't sufficient to help subsidize the nursing home.

"I can't be more clear that the fund balance is important. We've worked hard to get it back, and I would be the first in line to say that if we had it, let's help the nursing home. But that's not the case," Welch said.

He acknowledged that most of the nursing home's problems could be traced to delayed payments by the state of Illinois.

"It's not their fault that the state isn't paying the Medicaid," Welch said.

Sections (2):News, Local

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Westsider wrote on January 11, 2017 at 7:01 am

Strange how Republicans want to hear the people's voice on sale, but not on a tax increase.

rsp wrote on January 11, 2017 at 12:01 pm

So which has priority? If they both pass who decides which one the taxpayers supported? The bottom line is we voted for a new nursing home and the county board has not supported it. The building of it wasn't properly supervised. They've kept one foot out the door from the start. How long should it take to get the food service fixed? Not months, that's for sure.

It makes the most sense if the funding is the issue if we fully fund it and stabilize it, make it cost effective and not have the state's delays undermine it. That way as the money comes in it can create a fund for it. Have it become fully endowed in the future.

pattsi wrote on January 11, 2017 at 11:01 pm

Granted the meeting last evening was 4 hours long, but if you have time to watch the first hour plus you will find the answers to your posited question. Within this time framework ought to be the information shared by the county treasurer about the financial history of the old home and the present home. It is very important and concrete information that puts into perspective just how difficult it was and is to move to economically stabilize the home.

Here is the video for the 10 Jan 17 meeting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfn-E3ig4eI