County board may contribute to tourism bureau

URBANA — Champaign County Board members will consider providing funding to the Champaign County Convention and Visitors Bureau at Thursday's meeting.

On the board's agenda is a plan to direct $15,000 in county hotel-motel tax revenue to the tourism office, which faces the loss of funding from the city of Urbana. Mayor Laurel Prussing recently vetoed a city appropriation to the convention and visitors bureau, saying that "a far better use of the $71,820 would be to pay to fill two vacant police positions and to establish a reasonable pay differential between police lieutenants and sergeants."

"I think we should make a contribution," county board Chair C. Pius Weibel said Friday. "There are things out in the county that tourists might be interested in. As far as we can tell, the county has never supported the convention and visitors bureau."

Champaign Republican Alan Nudo said he suggested the county contribute to the bureau.

"They do generate business. They go out and they take calls, and get everything from weddings to big conventions," Nudo said. "We need to become an active member of their board. I think it's time we did something."

Urbana Democrat Brendan McGinty said he's not sure whether other county board members will agree, but he wants to help the tourism agency in what he called its "dilemma."

"My hope is that the board as a whole will understand the value that is brought to the entire region by the effort put forth by that organization," McGinty said. "This is one where you have to spend a little bit to make more."

The convention and visitors bureau needs a commitment from the county board by July 31 in order to obtain state funding, according to a memo to board members. Every dollar of local funding is matched by the state for bureau operations.

"This is one where I feel we need to step up and show the community what the county thinks of this, in response to what I consider to be an extremely short-sighted opinion by the mayor of Urbana," McGinty said.

The county established a hotel-motel tax in 1987 to help defray the cost of a $4 million pledge toward the expansion and improvement of Willard Airport. That obligation was retired in 1998. Since that time, proceeds from the hotel-motel tax have gone to items such as overtime pay for sheriff's deputies covering University of Illinois football games and other special events.

The hotel-motel tax will raise about $22,000 in the current fiscal year, according to estimates. There are only two facilities in unincorporated Champaign County that provide hotel-motel tax proceeds — a Motel 6 on North Cunningham Avenue and the Sweet Dreams Bed and Breakfast outside of Pesotum.

The county board is scheduled to meet at 7 p.m. Thursday at the Brookens Administrative Center, 1776 E. Washington St., U.

Also on Thursday's agenda is approval of a new intergovernmental funding agreement between the state Department of Healthcare and Family Services and the county nursing home, and a resolution to place a plaque outside of the county courthouse honoring architect Joseph Royer.

The intergovernmental agreement, already OK'd by the county's nursing home board, estimates that the county could receive as much as $1.7 million, retroactive to October 2009, in Medicaid reimbursements. The nursing home also stands to get another $188,000 from the resolution of a separate issue with the state. Managers at the nursing home have suggested that the proceeds could be used to pay off about $2 million in payments owed to nursing home vendors.

The plaque honoring Royer, an Urbana native and University of Illinois alumnus who designed numerous buildings in Urbana including the county courthouse, would be mounted on a pole at the courthouse plaza. All costs associated with the plaque would be covered by the city of Urbana as part of its Royer Arts and Architecture District.

Nudo also said that Republican Party officials have not yet named a successor for board member Larry Sapp, who submitted his resignation last month. Republicans expect to have a replacement ready for the August board meeting, he said.

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Yatiri wrote on July 16, 2011 at 11:07 am

I haven't heard anybody seriously refute the notion that the CVB does little to benefit the county.

Wouldn't the hotels and motels be better off with a tax break? Since the original reason for the tax, Willard, is now moot, why not drop the tax instead of spending it on CVB?

Yatiri wrote on July 16, 2011 at 11:07 am

I haven't heard anybody seriously refute the notion that the CVB does little to benefit the county.

Wouldn't the hotels and motels be better off with a tax break? Since the original reason for the tax, Willard, is now moot, why not drop the tax instead of spending it on CVB?

Yatiri wrote on July 16, 2011 at 11:07 am

I haven't heard anybody seriously refute the notion that the CVB does little to benefit the county.

Wouldn't the hotels and motels be better off with a tax break? Since the original reason for the tax, Willard, is now moot, why not drop the tax instead of spending it on CVB?

Sid Saltfork wrote on July 16, 2011 at 11:07 am

Great!! Now, the county will be paying for it. Most of the county does not benefit from it as Champaign, and Urbana benefits. Since C-U has monetary problems due to crime, statues, and municipality upgrades; the people living outside of C-U have to pay for it? How about maintaining things outside of C-U? I am not a resident of Savoy. There are many small municipalities in Champaign County besides C-U. The galling thing is that many of the county board residents live in C-U; not outside of it. People visit C-U for the university, business, and relatives. They are coming here anyway. Again, what tourist attraction is there in Champaign County that requires promotion????? Oh... maybe a 150 foot statue of Abe Lincoln might bring them; or a soccer stadium??? How about leaving those that live outside of C-U out of it?

serf wrote on July 16, 2011 at 1:07 pm

Seems a little foolish for the county board to give away money, considering the financial crunch they are in. I would hope that the same board members who tried to refuse free federal money to give rides to the seniors and the poor would stay consistent in their concerns about spending our tax money on 'frivolities.'

OwlCreekObserver wrote on July 17, 2011 at 11:07 am

If the Bureau is fulfilling its mission of bringing visitors to Chambana, then why not just change the name to reflect only Champaign? Prussing has every right to deny them funds and they have every right to remove everything in Urbana from their coverage going forward.

News by Date