Prussing insisting on full Olympian Drive project
URBANA – Laurel Prussing, never known to shrink from a fight, isn't about to back down from her insistence that the entire Olympian Drive project – from Apollo Drive to U.S. 45 – must be built.
The Urbana mayor said Friday that she wants the road built all the way to U.S. 45, even though several Champaign County Board members indicated Thursday that they would support construction only to Lincoln Avenue.
"No, we're committed to doing the whole project, and now it's just a question of timing," said Prussing, the No. 1 backer of the road proposed as a connector between Interstate 57 and U.S. 45.
"We don't have a problem with the (construction) order being from the (Canadian National) railroad tracks to Lincoln, and then doing Lincoln and then going to 45," she said. "But after all the planning that has gone into this and all the need there is for this road, I don't think that just two couples who moved in should be able to dictate over a very open public-input process that has gone on for years."
The two couples who are attempting to block the Olympian project, Prussing said, are Leslie Cooperband and Wesley Jarrell and Bill Cope and Mary Kolantzis.
"This whole project has been very carefully studied," she said. "Nothing has changed. The streams are the same. The land is the same. The only thing that has changed is these two couples who came to work at the University (of Illinois) and decided to locate right near where the road is going to be."
Several county board members said they believed they had established a bipartisan consensus at Thursday's meeting that the project should be focused on extending Lincoln Avenue north to Olympian and building Olympian east to Lincoln. That would require amending an agreement with the state that gave Urbana $5 million for the Olympian project.
Dave Speicher, local roads engineer with the Illinois Department of Transportation office in Paris, said state officials would consider a change to the grant if local state legislators requested it.
"What I'm hearing from other board members," Urbana Democrat Brendan McGinty said, "is that we can work it, we can do this, we can potentially redirect the money."
"I think there are a goodly number of Republicans who will support Lincoln Avenue," agreed Champaign Republican Alan Nudo.
But Prussing said she believes Champaign-Urbana residents want the entire project, which would cost approximately $30 million, to be built.
"County board members who are arguing against this road are arguing against their own constituents," she said. "This should not be Republican versus Democrats. It should not be urban versus rural. It's like, what is in the best interests of the majority of the public?"
Urbana Democrat Steve Beckett said he supported the full project, all the way to U.S. 45. He said it would be a "bait and switch to the developers and owners who invested on the west side of the tracks with the intergovernmental promise that this road was being built across the tracks," and would connect to U.S. 45.
Prussing, meanwhile, criticized fellow Democrat McGinty for working for a revised Olympian project.
"There's support for this in Champaign and Urbana," she said. "It's unfortunate that McGinty, who is a representative from Urbana, has abandoned Urbana's interests in favor of Laura Huth's clients."
Huth, a former Urbana City Council member and onetime Prussing ally, is a consultant for a group opposed to the project.
McGinty said Friday that he regretted Prussing's remarks.
"That's discouraging," he said, "but my eye is on the prize, which is real economic development up in that area that everyone can get behind. When we go out to 45, it will be because people want it and because it makes sense to do it."
Another public hearing on the Olympian Drive project will be held at 7 p.m. Wednesday at the Urbana Civic Center, 108 E. Water St., U.
Prussing is seriously mistaken on the amount of community support for Olympian Drive between Lincoln and Route 45. It's a pity she's taking the widespread opposition to that part of the project and trying to treat it all as if it were coming from only four or five people, which is plainly not the case.
Well I am a member of the Champaign-Urbana community and I fully support a complete Olympian Drive ALL the way across the northern section of the metro area...from Duncan Road on the west to US 45/Cunningham Avenue on the east...this road will be needed in the future and there is no reason to be short-sighted and not build it completely now! Ms. Huth is against this because she is being PAID to be against it. I do not always agree with Ms. Prussing...but on this she is dead-on correct...don't give in Laurel!
To loopillini: Are you certain Huth is being PAID for her work? Unless you've personally talked to her about this or seen a contract, I don't know that that's safe to say in this case. I know she regularly takes on pro bono clients and would not necessarily assume that this isn't one of those cases. Given her past (and continuing) community service work, that wouldn't surprise me. I also don't know that it's safe to say that she is against "this" -- seems to me that all of her and her client's recent public comments have to do with finding a reasonable solution that has to do with sound and justified economic development, not being against "this".
Simply put Champaign-Urbana is short-sighted when it comes to our infrastructure. We have streets, roads, and highways that are insufficient and an airport that is not competitive. Champaign-Urbana is not the “growing” community it once was and it is in jeopardy of becoming the next Danville. Take a glance at Bloomington-Normal and you will see the growth that is going to lead to a successful future. It is a shame this community has so many people that want to restrict and hold back progress.
Thank you, thank you personali, you are absolutely right. Champaign-Urbana once was on the horizon of being the next great city in Illinois. Bloomington-Normal has long taken that mantle from this city and now we are regulated to being just a small town with very small ideas and smaller actions. So sad and we have our current leadership in both cities to thank.
Wait, what? Champaign-Urbana is already a great city of Illinois. Have you driven through Bloomington or Normal recently? The traffic is horrendous, there's construction everywhere, and none of the new urban sprawl is at all attractive. Concrete begets concrete begets concrete. Champaign-Urbana is a beautiful and diverse community with a better nightlife, first-rate educational opportunities, and a growing research/technical industry. I beg you, please just move to Bloomington or Normal if you want to live in a place that emulates such; going the sprawl route here will just ruin it. Sure it might yield growth, but it isn't the kind of growth that's sustainable and then we really will become another Danville.
Are you for real? All you see is construction and heavy traffic in Bloomington-Normal and you think that's a bad thing. It shows that those two cities are progressive and forward thinking. Champaign can only wish they had "all that construction". No disrespect at all, but you are the main reason Champaign-Urbana will always be a 2nd rate city. It's people like you who hate growth and I guess love mega property tax rates. You live exactly where you belong.

More






Comments
News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. we reserve the right to remove any comment at its discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.