Even banning guns outright would not stop deranged people who are determined to kill others. But there are some things we could consider to reduce the possibility.
It's human nature to try to explain the unexplainable. When confronted with a tragedy such as the horrific shootings in Aurora, Colo., we all feel a need to find a cause and fix it.
But we may never know the cause, much less agree on a remedy.
When 24-year-old James Holmes walked into a crowded movie theater as the new Batman movie "The Dark Knight Rises" was playing and started shooting, he was armed with a military-style semi-automatic weapon, a shotgun and two pistols, all purchased legally. He killed 12 people and injured dozens more, finally surrendering to police in a parking lot.
In the aftermath of the shooting, we've had calls for increased gun restrictions as well as discussions of whether violent entertainment begets violent acts. Some say we've restricted guns too much.
Those who think more restrictive gun laws will prevent such tragedies are wrong. Restricting gun sales, outlawing certain weapons, even banning guns outright will not stop deranged individuals who are determined to kill others.
We might as well ban violent movies on the theory that they lead to violent behavior. Reports from Colorado say Holmes may have been fixated on Batman movies, but most experts agree that violent movies do not cause people to go on rampages, instead that people who are predisposed to violence are attracted to violent movies.
After the deadly shootings in Colorado, handgun sales are up across the country, including Illinois. People are buying guns out of concerns for possible new restrictions on ownership and also out of concerns for their safety. But these spikes are common after high-profile shootings. There are those who think that concealed carry and the elimination of "gun-free zones" are the way to prevent such incidents.
Politically, Congress is not likely to touch gun laws before an election, especially since polls show the public backing handgun ownership and opposing a ban on assault rifles. Neither President Obama nor challenger Mitt Romney shows any inclination to increase regulations.
Just last week, the Chicago city council approved a package of gun regulations pushed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel. But Chicago and Washington, D.C., both had handgun bans in place that were struck down by the Supreme Court in 2010 and 2008 respectively. Critics predicted gun violence would soar, but rates actually declined. Chicago has seen a spike in murders this year attributed to gang violence, but you can't regulate illegal guns possessed by gangs and criminals.
Federal and state laws already bar those convicted of felonies or acts of domestic violence or have been convicted of assault or battery or been patients in a mental institution or adjudicated as a mental defective, among other things.
But we are not helpless in the face of mass shootings. Here are some things we could do:
— A public service campaign about mental health services and to educate the public about signs of mental illness and what to do about it when someone appears to be in its grip. It helped change behavior for smoking, obesity and seat-belt usage.
— Better background checks, more information sharing between state and federal agencies. Federal law already required background checks for sales at federally licensed gun dealers, but that leaves approximately 40 percent of gun sales not subject to background checks. A recent survey showed that 70 percent of NRA members approved of criminal background checks for prospective gun owners. A group of mayors led by Michael Bloomberg want better background checks for firearms sales, including taking into account mental health issues, and a coalition of law enforcement groups on Thursday called for background checks on all gun buyers and a ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines after the Colorado shooting rampage.
— Limit high-capacity magazine sales. An "assault rifle" without a high-capacity magazine is just a rifle. A previous federal law limiting sales expired in 2004.
— Better ways to identify people who need mental health counseling on high school or college campuses. Some of the worst mass shootings in recent years happened on campuses or involved college students. University of Texas, Columbine, Northern Illinois University, Virginia Tech. On Friday, attorneys for Holmes, who was a former graduate student at the University of Colorado, disclosed that he was being treated by a psychiatrist at the university where he studied, a revelation that adds to suspicions that his life was in turmoil in the year before the rampage.
Encouraging the identification of mental illness, and a public service campaign on mental health services are commendable. However; Illinois, and the other states have cut mental health services. Mental health services are lacking in most all communities. They may exist in high schools, or universities; but they are reduced for the general public. The states passed the responsibility to the communities; and the communities have not funded the services adequately. The NRA will not allow a restriction on high-capacity magazine sales. The NRA will not allow "intrusive" background checks either. Expect more mentally ill people to use guns on others. Just read the gun-nut comments whenever gun restrictions are mentioned.
Shooting up dozens of people suggests maybe your life is in turmoil. Suggesting the fact that by seeing a psychiatrist someone's life is in turmoil plays into stereotypes. There are many reasons people consult with a psychiatrist including marriage counseling, parenting issues, and also routine medical care for disorders such as autism, which PCPs may not be as experienced with the meds to deal with. To continue pushing stereotypes off on people about psychiatry only discourages those who need help from getting it.
I am glad the NG has raised the issue of more gun regulations as a way to curb violence. Here in Illinois we have had a form of licensed gun ownership since the 1960's with the introduction of the FOID Card, a program ran by the State Police. A person Iliving in Illinois must have a FOID card to possess and purchase guns and ammunition. I don't know of another state that has such a program. However, as I read the police and court reports generated by Mary Schenk I have Never seen anyone ever charged with not having a FOID Card. When someone does a crime with a gun some of the laws violated can include, carrying a concealed weapon, carrying a loaded weapon, firing a gun in the city, possession of a gun by a felon and others. But rarely are these charges ever made and many that are end up dismissed. If you asked the State's Attorney they would likely say that these are waived in favor of "more serious" charges. The many gun laws in this State are dutifully obeyed by law abiding gun owners, they are Not the problem. Criminals who use guns while doing other crimes are, and officials who give them a free pass are adding to it.
Adding new gun laws that nobody will be charged with is not the answer.
We have all the gun laws we need and then some here in IL. Indeed, they are largely unenforced. Additional gun restriction laws are silly if we don't first enforce the laws we already have. Do the laws we have not work? Can't say for sure if we haven't tried enforcing them
I hear a lot about limiting magazines to 10 rounds. Pffft! Criminals committing violent crimes can change magazines very quickly. A law-abiding citizen defending himself or herself from one or more violent attackers might need more than 10 rounds, especially if the defender is physically disabled.
Make semi-automatic firearms illegal? Semi-automatic is not the same as fully automatic. Fully automatic firearms fire constantly or give a burst of several shots per single trigger press. Semi-automatics give only one shot per single trigger press, just like a bolt action, lever action or pump action. The difference is that with semi-automatic, the empty case is ejected and the next round is put into place. Able-bodied persons can quickly work bolts, levers and pumps, but the physically challenged rely on semi-automatic actions.
Limit "anonymous" ammunition purchases online? Do they even know what they are talking about? Let alone address and credit card information, IL residents must first fax or email copies of FOID card and DL card to online merchants before a purchase can be made.
Limit the number of rounds a person may purchase at one time? Target shooters require a lot of ammunition to practice their sports. Ammunition is expensive, and is cheaper to buy in bulk. Marksmanship requires practice.
Comments
News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.