Special session looking ordinary

Is the governor's call to address state pension problems falling on deaf ears?

Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn surprised a lot of people this week when he called for an Aug. 17 special legislative session to address the state's woefully underfunded public pension systems.

He even topped off his summons with an extra dose of hot rhetoric to emphasize the importance of legislative action.

"We can thread this needle. This is a crying need of our state. We must act," Quinn declared.

Unfortunately, the response from those who matter most to Quinn's call — state legislative leaders — was underwhelming.

A spokesman for House Speaker Michael Madigan, who was out of state, offered no comment. Democratic Senate President John Cullerton suggested the special legislative session would be a waste of money. Republican House and Senate leaders issued a statement that lauded Quinn's call but pointedly expressed no interest in accommodating Democratic proposals.

The Chicago Sun-Times summarized that lack of enthusiasm with a headline that stated, "Going nowhere."

Quinn has been trying to lead on this issue, but most legislators show no interest in following. Unfortunately, the governor has neither the influence nor the proposal to change that political dynamic.

Illinois' public pensions are underfunded by roughly $83 billion, a sum that is growing by an estimated $12.6 million each day. But eliminating that shortfall will require action sure to alienate some voters — most obviously, public employee union members — in this election year.

That's why most political observers expect the Illinois House and Senate to wait until after the November election before trying to resolve this unavoidable problem.

The state has no choice but to act. But when is a matter of some speculation. Speaker Madigan, a master political tactician, apparently would prefer to wait until after the election to allow members of his caucus to escape the voters' wrath.

Politics aside, however, the biggest roadblock to a legislative solution is the lack of a plan acceptable to legislators from both parties.

Before adjourning in May, members of the Senate passed a modest pension reform bill that would affect legislators and employees in the state's executive branch. A more ambitious bill that would have included public school teachers and university employees stalled in the House after Madigan insisted that the pension costs for teachers be shifted from the state to local school districts.

Representatives of the governor's office and legislative leaders have continued to meet since then, but no agreement appears to be close.

Further complicating the issue is the requirement that legislation be passed by a three-fifths, not a simple, majority. That higher hurdle kicked in after the May 31 legislative deadline for action passed.

From the outside, it looks like a continued stalemate on pensions.

That's the last thing Quinn wants. But the ball is in legislators' court, and they show no interest in playing.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion
Categories (2):Editorials, Opinions

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Sid Saltfork wrote on August 01, 2012 at 7:08 pm

"most obviously, public employee union members"?  All public employees, their families, and friends are going to be alienated; not just the union members.  Your right wing slip is showing.  The "pension reform" affects many more than just the union members.  It even affects the anti-union members which is a considerable number of people.  What is your next opinion?  Are you going to advocate that all public employees whether current, or retired be required to wear arm bands in public for identification?   How about some transparency; and call it propaganda instead of an opinion?  

nick wrote on August 01, 2012 at 10:08 pm

I appreciate that Pat Quinn has shown leadership in trying to address this issue.The sad reality is that public employees will lose our pensions in the future.Benefits and salary have been on a downward spiral for quite sometime for those in public service who are not under ''star contacts'',such as administrators and coaches.Serving as a police officer,firefighter,teacher or any area of public service will become more and more difficult. Public service will not be an option for those seeking to live what was once known as a middle class life.

Sid Saltfork wrote on August 01, 2012 at 10:08 pm

Expect the lower level public employee services to be contracted out in the future.  Halliburton, or another corporation, will be contracted to provide correctional officers, police, firefighters, teachers, state employees, and university employees.  Your right, Nick.  The administrative positions will be kept under special contracts to have public administrators overseeing the corporate employees.  It will not be cheaper; but it will provide campaign donations, and no worker rights or benefits.  Taxes will rise regardless of pension debt, and obligations.  "Middle class" will disappear as a term just as "Moderate" is rapidly disappearing.  America will deteriorate from within just as Rome did.