Pull plug on pension plan

Why not start removing state legislators from the taxpayer-funded gravy train?

Pandering to the public is the politician's stock in trade.

But every now and then, the pandering gets out of hand and a serious legislative proposal emerges. Or, as Springfield political pundit Rich Miller recently put it, "Maybe Pandora's Box has been opened for good."

Miller was referring to one of this year's favored campaign themes — elimination of the generous pensions paid to retired state legislators.

Attempting to put Republicans on the defensive, House Speaker Michael Madigan is championing the idea, at least publicly. It's doubtful that Madigan is serious, but roughly 20 Republicans running for the House or Senate have vowed not to sign up for the legislative pension system if they are elected in November, while another 10 Democrats running for the House or Senate have said they'll refuse a pension or work to reduce benefits.

Officially, service as a legislator is considered to be a part-time job. But their pension benefits — roughly 80 percent of their final pay after 20 years employment — are excessively generous. Some legislators manage to goose their pensions to stratospheric levels by getting higher-paying jobs in state government after leaving the General Assembly. They work briefly and then step down with an even more lavish pension. Illinois history is littered with stories of that kind of abuse of taxpayer money.

So why not pull the plug on all this unjustified generosity? For starters, Illinois is broke and can't afford it. There's also the matter of the need to address the serious financial woes of Illinois' public pensions, reforms that will require sacrifice by members of those pension systems. Why shouldn't legislators set a good example and go first?

Because of Illinois law, the Legislature can only eliminate pensions of new House and Senate members. That would make it easier for our incumbents to eliminate the pensions because they would not be affected.

Given the more than $80-billion unfunded liability of Illinois' public pensions, eliminating pensions for new legislators wouldn't save much — certainly not at the start. But the longest journey begins with but one step. Why not take it?

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion
Categories (2):Editorials, Opinions

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Sid Saltfork wrote on October 07, 2012 at 7:10 pm

If the rank and file state employees could accept bribes legally like the campaign donations to the legislators, the rank and file state employees could agree to pension reductions also.  A law providing an annual raise like the legislators have would mean contract negotiations would not be necessary either.  The proposed pension reform to the state pension systems exempts one system; the judges pension system.  Wonder why?  A few years ago; a bill was introduced to combine all of the state pension systems into one including the legislators, and judges with the state, and university employees.  It was never passed in the legislature.  Wonder why?  A recent poll of Illinois citizens found that the vast majority believe that rampant corruption exists in Illinois politics.  Wonder why?