Our choices for county office

Our choices for county office

There are six countywide races up for election on Nov. 6, but Champaign County voters will have to give serious thought to just four of them.

That's because Champaign County State's Attorney Julia Rietz, a Democrat, is running without opposition, as is Coroner Duane Northrup, a Republican.

In the contested races, only one elected incumbent, Recorder of Deeds Barb Frasca, is running for re-election. Another incumbent, Republican County Clerk Gordy Hulten, was appointed to fill a vacancy left by former clerk Mark Shelden, who left office to join the staff of U.S. Rep. Tim Johnson.

There will be some new faces in at least two offices, those of auditor and circuit clerk.

It's past time for a new auditor, a position that county Democrats despoiled when they appointed outgoing incumbent Tony Fabri to fill a vacancy and then backed him for re-election. Fabri's tenure as a county elected official is one of the most bizarre in county history, noteworthy only because he made a point of not bothering to come to work with disturbing regularity.

In the circuit clerk's office, longtime Republican incumbent Linda Frank opted not to run for re-election after 21 years in charge of the office.

In both cases, change will be good. Fabri has been a disgrace as auditor, while Frank's departure will allow for some fresh blood and renewed energy in the circuit clerk's office.

Following are The News-Gazette's endorsements.

Auditor

The News-Gazette would prefer an appointed auditor with specific professional credentials serving a fixed term to escape political pressures. But voters prefer otherwise.

This race features Democrat George Danos, a political newcomer, against Republican John Farney, a veteran politico who works in the county clerk's office.

The News-Gazette endorses Danos, who has the better educational and professional background for the job. He has degrees in economics and actuarial science, and he has worked with budget numbers and financial forecasting in the private sector.

For his part, Farney offers a background as a past candidate for office, familiarity with current county operations because of his experience in the county clerk's office and the willingness to work hard as the taxpayer's watchdog.

The watchdog role is crucial. Given the gerrymandering of county board districts that virtually guarantees a majority Democratic county board, Farney can argue with credibility that, as a Republican, he's best suited to keep an eye on county spending. However, given his nonpartisan background, The News-Gazette is comfortable that Danos also would fulfill that role in a way that protects taxpayers' interests.

County clerk

Republican Hulten and Democrat Charlie Smyth, a member of the Urbana City Council, are competing for this important office, which conducts elections and keeps track of vital records.

The News-Gazette endorses Hulten on the strength of his successful stewardship during his two-plus years in office. If it's not broke, there is no reason to make a change.

Hulten already has presided over one big election, the November 2010 race, without problems. He has maintained good relations with members of his staff, has presided over a voter registration drive that has produced more registered voters than ever in the county's history, has worked well with members of the opposite party and has run his office with the goal of scrupulously obeying state statutes.

Smyth cited his long expertise in computer information systems, suggesting that his plans to increase efficiency will result in cleaner voting rolls and significant savings. But a subtext of his campaign is the Democrats' longtime resentment of past Republican county clerks Dennis Bing and Mark Shelden. Smyth offers to end a Republican "stranglehold" on the office.

If the Republican Party does have a stranglehold on the county clerk's office, it's because the voters have consistently elected Republican candidates to run it.

Circuit clerk

The race for the post of circuit clerk, which handles records for the courts, poses a happy dilemma for voters.

In our view, both Republican Katie Blakeman and Democrat Barbara Wysocki are impressive. The News-Gazette endorses Blakeman because her background and education in information management services makes her better suited to the document-heavy office.

Blakeman, who has worked at the University of Illinois and in the private sector, and Wysocki, a retired University High School teacher and former county board chairwoman, share similar views about the challenges facing the office. Each candidate said it will be important to hire a deputy clerk to help manage the office, lay the groundwork for the electronic filing of court documents, establish harmonious relations with office employees and continue to pursue technological innovations that will make it easier to keep track of court records.

Wysocki said her background as a teacher and member of the county board proves she is "someone (people) know and trust." Because she is younger than Wysocki, Blakeman has a less extensive track record, but, in our view, is better prepared to do the job.

Recorder of deeds

This one won't take long. Incumbent Republican Barb Frasca is seeking her fifth term in office and is running against Democrat D'Anne Winston, a former recorder's office employee.

Frasca has done a fine job with limited resources, and there simply is no need to replace someone who has demonstrated her ability to run this office over the long haul with someone who has not. The News-Gazette endorses Frasca.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion
Categories (2):Editorials, Opinions
Tags (1):2012 election

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

rsp wrote on October 31, 2012 at 11:10 am

 

Because she is younger than Wysocki, Blakeman has a less extensive track record, but, in our view, is better prepared to do the job.

Might want to rephrase that. Unless you meant to pick her because she was younger.

johnny wrote on October 31, 2012 at 12:10 pm

Let me see if I have this straight:  you say, "Frank's departure will allow for some fresh blood and renewed energy in the circuit clerk's office," yet you go with the candidate who promises to pick up where she left off and actively seek her advice?

Not sure what rsp asked about is a typo after all.

Commonsenseman wrote on October 31, 2012 at 2:10 pm

I hope someone will run against Rietz next time, her lack of flexibility has really harmed a number of people I know.

wayward wrote on October 31, 2012 at 10:10 pm

In our view, both Republican Katie Blakeman and Democrat Barbara Wysocki are impressive. The News-Gazette endorses Blakeman because her background and education in information management services makes her better suited to the document-heavy office.

I'm a little confused -- her work experience seems to be sales and fundraising, which is fine, but that's different than managing IT services.

Political Observer wrote on November 05, 2012 at 1:11 am

Congratulations are in order for the News-Gazette, for their continually being able to attain higher and higher levels of efficiency in their dishonest and corrupt editorial endorsements, by finding new ways to squeeze more and more outrageous lies into fewer and fewer sentences!  Let’s take a look at the extraordinary dishonesty in their endorsement of long-time dirty-tricks expert Gordy Hulten / Mr. IlliniPundit, and their promotion of his endless efforts to corrupt the elections of Champaign County.

1. Let’s start with:

“The News-Gazette endorses Hulten on the strength of his successful stewardship during his two-plus years in office. If it's not broke, there is no reason to make a change.”

WOW! That’s 2 lies and a major misdirection in just 2 short sentences! First of all, how has Hulten been in office for two-plus years, when Mark Shelden didn’t resign until after the 2010 elections, and Hulten didn’t take office until 2011? What does the “successful stewardship” of Hulten refer to? Is that a reference to the long list of Gordy Boo Boos he’s presided over during his short tenure as Acting County Clerk, like the Gordy and “Bull”-Winkel Show he orchestrated to dump Stephanie Holderfield? You might want to consult your reader comments from earlier this year, to see what your readers thought of his “successful stewardship” in that debacle. Meanwhile, your major misdirection consists of giving a wrong form of your maxim for making change; the form of it that you want is, “Since the system is now massively broken [thanks to Gordy's hyper-partisanship], there certainly is good reason to make a major change.”

2. We continue on with,

“Hulten already has presided over one big election, the November 2010 race, without problems.”

Oh, really? I thought Mark Shelden had just run for re-election and won in November, 2010, then resigned right after the election, so that the Republicans could appoint an insider like Hulten, who could then falsely claim to be a long-serving, elected incumbent in the next election. So you’re saying that Hulten presided over the 2010 elections, before he was even appointed as the new County Clerk?

3. “He has maintained good relations with members of his staff, has presided over a voter registration drive that has produced more registered voters than ever in the county's history, has worked well with members of the opposite party and has run his office with the goal of scrupulously obeying state statutes.”

Well, 2 out of 4 ain’t bad! Are you saying that Democrats actually enjoy Hulten’s voter caging / voter suppression techniques?  You might want to go back and take a look at these reader comments from way back on October 12th:

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/politics-and-government/2012-10-12/2012-election-candidate-questionnaire-gordy-hulten-champaign#comment-490300

And, by the way, you left the prefix “dis” off of the word “disobeying.”

4. “If the Republican Party does have a stranglehold on the county clerk's office, it's because the voters have consistently elected Republican candidates to run it.”

I suppose that’s an OK statement, as long as you don’t try to add the phrase “fair and square” in there somewhere.