Election blather

Election blather

No matter what the office, last-minute attacks are part and parcel of our political campaigns.

Elections almost always get ugly and desperate in their final stages.

Nervous candidates and their frazzled supporters, cracking under the last-minute pressure, grow increasingly cranky as the hours to election day draw short, and they frequently give in to the temptation to make wild charges they hope will pay off at the ballot box.

That's the best explanation for the joint news conference held last week by Charlie Smyth, the Democratic candidate for Champaign County clerk, state Rep. Naomi Jakobsson and state Sen. Mike Frerichs.

Flanked by the two Democratic legislators, Smyth repeated a major theme of his campaign — his Republican opponent Gordy Hulten is improperly trying to "suppress" voter turnout. In other words, he's accusing Hulten, whose job it is to conduct elections, of trying to deny people their lawful right to vote.

Unfortunately for Smyth, Frerichs and Jakobsson actually undermined Smyth's charge by pledging to introduce legislation that will change the rules in future elections.

So if it's necessary to pass a law to require the clerk to do things differently in the future, doesn't that indicate that Hulten's actions are in compliance with state statutes, and, if so, what's the fuss?

The answer is obvious — this is another in a series of political attacks designed to give the impression that Hulten is improperly using his post to discourage those he suspects to be Democrats from casting ballots in Tuesday's election. That's quite a charge to lodge against a clerk who has presided over the registration of the largest number of voters in county history.

The particulars of this dispute involve "grace period" voters, those who blew the state-mandated Oct. 9 registration deadline and waited until the last minute to register. Hulten could allow same-day voting, but prefers to have late-registrants apply for an absentee ballot, wait for the application to come in the mail, return it and then wait for the absentee ballot.

It's certainly more cumbersome than allowing same-day voting, but Hulten said he prefers to treat all voters the same.

In the case of all newly registered voters, it means confirming the registrant's address by sending a piece of mail to the address listed and conducting a duplicate registration check. Is that process the hallmark of "voter suppression"?

The Democrats even trotted out one of those grace-period voters, an Urbana resident who complained not that he's being denied the right to cast his ballot but rather that he's afraid he won't receive his absentee ballot in time.

There will, of course, always be people who wait until the absolute last minute and want what they want when they want it. If there weren't, Smyth, Jakobsson and Frerichs couldn't use them as dubious exhibits at their politically inspired news conferences.

There are few things easier than registering to vote and voting. That Smyth has to go to such lengths to attack his opponent suggests he doesn't have much else to talk about.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion
Categories (2):Editorials, Opinions
Tags (1):2012 election


News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

syzlack wrote on November 05, 2012 at 8:11 am

"frazzled supporters, cracking under the last-minute pressure, grow increasingly cranky as the hours to election day draw short, and they frequently give in to the temptation to make wild charges they hope will pay off at the ballot box."

I think we can use that observation to explain the Sunday N-G editorial and Foreman column.

wayward wrote on November 05, 2012 at 10:11 am

Asking for clearer rules about grace period voting, as Freirichs and Jakobsson are apparently doing, actually seems like a pretty reasonable thing to do.

Sid Saltfork wrote on November 05, 2012 at 10:11 am

Well, Sunshine Week is coming up this spring.  Maybe, some non-partisan opinions will be expressed by the News Gazette during that one week out of fifty two weeks.  One might as well read the GOP webpage rather than taking the time to read the News Gazette's opinions.

Keep your attention on the battle between the two parties.  That way you will avoid the reality of what is coming.  The 60 Minutes interview with Mitch, and Harry demonstrated the politicians of both parties in inaction.  Change is coming sooner, or later.  When it does; all Hades is going to break loose.  Better to drop the simple allegiance to one party, or the other; and form alliances based on the things that need change.