Court pulls plug on recess ploy

Court pulls plug on recess ploy

American presidents are powerful, but they are not all-powerful.

No one should have been surprised last week when a federal appeals court unanimously ruled that recess appointments made by President Obama when the U.S. Senate was not in recess are null and void.

The court ruling, which Obama is expected to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review, strikes down appointments to the National Labor Relations Board and, as a result, renders decisions made by the NLRB under its wrongly appointed leaders illegitimate. It also creates the possibility that other Obama recess appointees will fall prey to similar legal challenges.

Obama made the disputed appointments after he and Republican members of the Senate could not reach agreement on his NLRB appointees.

Presidents are allowed to make recess appointments when the Senate actually is in recess.

But when Senate Democrats, including then-Sen. Barack Obama, were angered by recess appointments made by former President Bush, they decided not ever to go into recess, even when members of the Senate left town. Instead, the Senate held brief pro forma sessions, thus preventing Bush from acting in senators' absence.

Bush respected the Senate practice, which was continued when Obama became president. But Obama, insisting he had the authority to declare when the Senate was in session, did not, declaring the Senate to be out of session when he made his NLRB appointments.

Now a federal appeals court has struck down Obama's ambitious effort to expand his appointments power.

"Allowing the president to define the scope of his own appointment power would eviscerate the Constitution's separation of powers," Justice David Sentelle wrote for the court.

The U.S. Constitution requires that presidents make appointments with the advice and consent of the Senate. Obama might not like that, but he will have to learn he can't assert authority he doesn't have to evade Senate review.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion
Categories (2):Editorials, Opinions

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Sid Saltfork wrote on January 28, 2013 at 1:01 pm

Let's be honest here.  Congress due to the extreme  bipartisanism, especially in the House of Representatives, refused to confirm, or deny, the presidential appointments.  They left town to celibrate Christmas, and to campaign, while leaving the people's business hanging including the Fiscal Cliff.  The pro forma sessions consist of one congress person standing in an empty room pretending that Congress is in session.  They have the cheek to call it Democracy.  They should be sesquistered just like a jury until they finish the people's business in front of them without access to the lobbiests who pay them.  If they cannot do that, the charade of Democracy should end.