Gun safety in public housing

Gun safety in public housing

Public housing has a reputation as a place where firearms pose a problem.

Federal court decisions affirming the constitutional right of citizens to possess firearms continue to reverberate throughout Illinois.

The U.S. Supreme Court handed down rulings in 2008 and 2010 that struck down laws in Washington, D.C., and Chicago that banned the possession of firearms. In early December, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago used those precedents to find Illinois' ban on concealed carry to be unconstitutional.

Attorney General Lisa Madigan has announced that she'll ask all the justices who preside in the 7th circuit to conduct an en banc review of that decision. But if the decision stands, Illinois legislators will have no choice but to fashion legislation that recognizes the legitimacy of concealed carry as a constitutional mandate.

The 7th circuit decision is a big one. But there are smaller spin-offs from this series of Second Amendment decisions, including a recent legal recommendation that residents of public housing in Champaign County be allowed to possess firearms.

The housing authority has long banned residents from possessing firearms. But the agency's insurers now say the ban must be lifted, obviously fearing legal liability stemming from violating the constitutional rights of residents.

At first glance, some might view the recommendation as a potential problem, and it may prove to be.

Then again, it may not, and here's why.

The housing authority is being advised that it must permit residents to possess a firearm — if they comply with the requirements of state law. That would include obtaining a Firearm Owners Identification Card, which is reviewed and approved by law enforcement authorities.

There's a big difference between people who possess firearms legally and those who do so in violation of law. Most criminal activity is committed by those who illegally possess firearms.

Urbana Police Chief Pat Connolly raised a valid point when he suggested that housing authority residents who ultimately are allowed to possess firearms be advised to store the weapons safely. Indeed, the housing authority should investigate what training and educational steps it can take to ensure their residents safely possess firearms.

There is nothing new about the illegal possession of firearms in public housing. Their legal possession by residents who take affirmative steps to comply with the law is another matter altogether, and not necessarily a threat to public safety.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion
Categories (2):Editorials, Opinions

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

rsp wrote on February 04, 2013 at 12:02 pm

 

Indeed, the housing authority should investigate what training and educational steps it can take to ensure their residents safely possess firearms.

Should the residents be required to have training that is not required by law? Storage requirements not required by law? Threatened with eviction if they try to take their gun to a range to practice and back home as the recommendations suggest? Required to register their guns and their ammunition? No other tenant would have to abide by these restrictions. In fact the housing authority would set itself up as the arbiter of whether someone's rights could be withdrawn.