Let's put fracking to vote

Here's more proof that politics always trumps policy in the Land of Lincoln.

Illinois residents need jobs, government at all levels needs revenue and passing a "fracking" bill in Springfield is a good way to achieve both goals.

So why is legislation, which has the backing of both business and environmental groups, dozens of legislators and Gov. Pat Quinn, stuck in an Illinois House committee when it could be passed and signed into law?

The answer to this and so many other legislative questions is this: House Speaker Michael Madigan, the all-powerful Chicago Democrat, wants it that way.

There is considerable speculation as to why he wants it that way. Some say he's trying to squeeze more tax concessions from the oil industry. Some suggest he's doing a favor for organized labor. Some suggest that he's holding the fracking bill hostage so he can bludgeon downstate legislators into voting for other legislation they might not favor.

With Madigan, one never really knows until after it's all over. So time will tell.

But, suffice it to say, it won't be in the public's best interest for the General Assembly to adjourn without passing a "fracking" bill.

The legislation represents a potentially strong economic boost for downstate, where oil companies are already signing leases to explore for energy using this sophisticated new method.

Hydraulic fracturing — fracking — uses high-pressure mixtures of sand, water and chemicals to crack rock formations and release previously impossible-to-reach oil and natural gas. Environmentalists have raised objections to the process, but the bill pending in Illinois includes safeguards worked out by the attorney general's office, environmental groups and oil and gas lobbyists.

As is the case in other states where fracking has revitalized the economy, Illinois is potentially rich in undiscovered oil and gas. Specifically, an area in southern Illinois identified as the New Albany shale is ripe for exploration. But nothing can or will be done if the Legislature does not act.

Another month or so won't make much difference, so Madigan's gamesmanship is not fatal. But this has to get done. If the fracking bill does not pass, Illinois has thrown away another opportunity to boost its economy.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Sid Saltfork wrote on May 03, 2013 at 2:05 pm

Hopefully, there is an enormous amount of oil shale under the State Capitol Building. There definitely is an enormous amount of natural gas in the building.

It is Illinois.  Chicago is all for the money from fracking as long as it is done in "southern Illinois".  "Campaign donations" flow into the legislators accounts across the state from the lobby interests.  Illinois will become a fracking state.

GoingtoHeck wrote on May 03, 2013 at 11:05 pm

I'm not sold on fracking.  I truly believe the process destabilizes the earth's crust (? more?) and causes earthquakes.  We need to know much more about the process and its wide ranging effects before embracing it without reservation.

SaintClarence27 wrote on May 11, 2013 at 7:05 pm

It's not about earthquakes. That doesn't happen.


What it IS about, though, is chemicals in the water supply.