Concealed-carry confusion

Concealed-carry confusion

It's the duty of state prosecutors to enforce the law until the law is changed by the proper authorities.

It would be a gross understatement, to say the least, to suggest that Illinois is in a state of confusion on the issue of a citizen's right to carry a concealed weapon. It's in a state of chaos and confusion.

Here's the problem.

In December 2012, a federal appeals court struck down Illinois' ban on concealed carry, ruling that it violates citizen rights under the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The court gave the Illinois General Assembly six months to pass a concealed-carry law. The deadline was scheduled to expire on June 9, but the appeals court gave an additional 30 days to allow more leeway for the legislative process.

State legislators passed a concealed-carry bill in the legislative session's waning days and sent it to Gov. Pat Quinn for his signature. But Quinn is uncertain what he'll do with the bill, and critics of the legislation have urged him to veto it.

If Quinn vetoes the bill or if he has not taken action by July 9, citizens still will have the right to carry a concealed weapon. But there will be no rules. That's why Quinn needs to sign the bill.

If that uncertainty is not bad enough, various state's attorneys, mostly in downstate, have announced that they will peremptorily stop enforcing Illinois' ban on concealed carry because they don't agree with it. They say they won't wait until July 9, when the current ban expires and concealed carry takes effect.

These public officials are acting precipitously. They took an oath to enforce the laws of the State of Illinois, not to pick and choose the laws they will enforce. They may characterize their decisions as acts of prosecutorial discretion, but discretion is exercised on a case-by-case basis.

July 9 will come soon enough. Until then, the state's attorneys in Illinois would do well to emulate the position taken by Sangamon County State's Attorney John Milhiser.

"We're going to have a concealed-carry law. But until we have one, I can't come out and say I'm not going to enforce the (current) law," he said.

Concealed-carry supporters may question that decision. But it's Milhiser's job, and he swore an oath to carry it out.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

cmstites wrote on June 14, 2013 at 9:06 am

They also took an oath to protect the rights of citizens and to uphold the constitution which they are doing.

OilCity wrote on June 20, 2013 at 1:06 am

So much for the gunners' philosophy of "If they only enforced the laws on the books!"

mikedee wrote on June 14, 2013 at 12:06 pm

6 months no action

pension left dangling

this looks like a RICO typr crime

all the insiders get goodies and the rest pay for it

term limits

salary limits

no pension and no benefits for all elected officails




FRO wrote on June 14, 2013 at 2:06 pm

How can a states attorney uphold the so called "law" if the law has been ruled unconstitutional?  I 100% support the "DOWNSTATE" states attorny"s.

billbtri5 wrote on June 14, 2013 at 10:06 pm

"pick and choose"...? have you ever read what happens here in Champaign County ?..I can't say I have ever seen a criminal charged with not having a FOID Card..not ever...