Dems' best bet is Rosenberg

Dems' best bet is Rosenberg

Champaign-Urbana Democrats are witnessing a hotly contested race to fill a rare open seat in the Illinois House of Representatives.

When Democratic state Rep. Naomi Jakobsson of Urbana announced last year that she would not seek another term in office, it guaranteed a political brouhaha over who would succeed her.

Ultimately, only two Democrats stepped forward — Urbana Alderwoman Carol Ammons and Champaign lawyer Sam Rosenberg. They've waged a spirited and sometimes acrimonious battle for the hearts and minds of their party members in the 103rd House District.

These two Democrats represent the two wings of their party. Rosenberg is backed by the Democratic establishment exemplified by Rep. Jakobsson, Urbana Mayor Laurel Prussing and other prominent local party members who are used to calling the shots — even Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. Despite her political history that includes election to the city council and the county board, Ammons represents party outsiders who are extremely discontent with, even hostile to, the party and political status quo.

But whatever their party pedigree, the question facing voters in next week's primary election is which of the two would be a better, more effective advocate for their district. In our view, the choice is clear. For that reason, The News-Gazette endorses Rosenberg for the Democratic nomination to take on Republican Kristin Williamson in the November general election.

Just 29, Rosenberg, a lawyer, offers voters little more than ambition and promise. But it's our view that he shows great promise, and he could become an important factor in Springfield once he gets some experience under his belt. A former assistant state's attorney and now a lawyer with a prominent Champaign firm, Rosenberg has demonstrated that he's a quick learner and a high achiever.

The News-Gazette makes those observations with the clear understanding that we do not share Rosenberg's liberal views. He supports a graduated income tax that in our view will raise taxes on almost everyone; he supports a minimum-wage increase that in our view will cause a loss of jobs and make it harder for the unemployed, particularly minorities, to secure employment; he supports organized labor down the line and is obviously unconcerned that the state's hostility to business creates a serious disincentive for job creators to locate or expand here.

Having said that, Rosenberg is in the mainstream of Democratic Party thinking as articulated by Gov. Pat Quinn and House and Senate legislative leaders.

If elected, Rosenberg will fit right in with the Democratic House caucus.

As for Ammons, she is an obviously intelligent, determined person who brings great energy to her campaign. For the most part, she and Rosenberg agree on the issues, so it's less a matter of policy for voters than political personality.

That's where Ammons' problems lie. From here, she looks like a corner-cutter. Ammons claimed an apparent mail-order college degree as proof of educational accomplishment. She was elected to and resigned from the Urbana school board because she was not legally qualified by virtue of residency to run. Her affiliation with the Champaign-Urbana Citizens for Peace and Justice shows a devotion to political causes that are out of step even with the community's liberal establishment.

Ammons is running for a legislative position, but she does not appear to have the kind of patient, consensus-building personality that the position requires.

There's an excellent chance, by virtue of how the 103rd House District map was drawn, that the winner of the Democratic primary will be the winner of the fall election. That was Speaker Madigan's intention when he gerrymandered the district lines, and he usually achieves his goals. Further, if either Ammons or Rosenberg is elected in the fall, they will have no choice but to accept conscription in Madigan's army. It's either that or political oblivion and, after some incredible hemming and hawing on the issue, both candidates reluctantly acknowledged he'll be the boss.

Whatever those realities may portend, Rosenberg is the far better choice in the Democratic primary.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

Sid Saltfork wrote on March 12, 2014 at 11:03 am

Well, Kristin Williamson got a free campaign advertisement from the one and only, local conservative newspaper. 

Wonder why there is only one republican running in the primary?  There were no other good candidates?  Does the GOP "select" it's candidates prior to the primary which is to "select" a candidate?  

Pick one of the two democrats, or the one republican when you vote.  Your choice is limited to one out of three since there are only two parties represented in this exercise in democracy.  I always vote for the one who I feel will steal the least from me.  However; I am cynical since I have lived, and worked in Illinois for a half of a century, and serveral decades.

Lance Dixon wrote on March 12, 2014 at 5:03 pm

The Rosenberg campaign sent out a false and negative mailer accusing Ammons of being a "politician's politician". In fact, Rosenberg would be the one owing his job to madigan if elected. Right wingers usually are the ones who use fear and divisiveness for their personal gain. So it's sad to see a liberal do it. For this reason, I'm voting for Ammons. 

Lance Dixon wrote on March 12, 2014 at 5:03 pm

Besides, if the political opinionators at the News-Gazette endorse him, that's my cue to support someone else.

wayward wrote on March 12, 2014 at 9:03 pm

The minutes for the 2003 school board meeting where Ammons (then Carol George) was not seated are here:
Interesting reading.