In your pocket one more time

In your pocket one more time

If you need proof that some of our elected officials live in a bubble, consider the proposed fine schedule for parking meter violations in Champaign.

City council members in Champaign may not think it's a big deal, but a tentative decision to jack fines for parking tickets through the roof is a real slap in the face.

After not increasing parking fines since 2007, council members went whole hog Tuesday night. After approving one freebie — a warning ticket for a first offense — council members approved escalating fines. A second parking ticket within 365 days carries a fine of $15, a third and fourth $25 and a fifth $35.

A fine of $15 is within the realm of reason. But $25 and $35 for a parking ticket?

This isn't Chicago, where outrageous fines for parking violations by municipal predators are commonplace, and it's hard to understand why such punitive numbers are needed here.

For starters, a parking meter violation is not a Class X felony. It's penny-ante stuff. Further, while some violations fall into the category of egregious, most people try to be reasonably vigilant about feeding the meters, and those who fall short are taking up spaces for hours at a time.

Council member Marci Dodds defended the increase, arguing that it's important to encourage motorists to come and go efficiently and making their parking spaces available for others. She insisted the fines are not intended to be punitive.

Well, whatever the intention, they are punitive. Fines of this nature for such a minor offense will not only be infuriating to people who can afford to pay them, but a real burden to those who cannot.

The council and the city administration seem not to realize that shows another, darker side of government — a willingness to take advantage of citizens to generate revenue. Whether we're talking red light cameras or steep parking fines, the goal seems to be to catch people engaging in violations so minor as to be meaningless and then gouge them for their audacity.

It's not a pretty sight. Indeed, it's the kind of thing that might even prompt Champaign's inexcusably lazy voters to participate in a municipal election.

Mayor Don Gerard and council members, with the exception of dissenter Karen Foster, need to re-think the fine schedule.

What's in place is clearly sufficient. A small increase is tolerable. But what they have in store for parking meter violators — even serial offenders — borders on obnoxiously unreasonable.

Sections (2):Editorials, Opinion

Comments embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

tolonotom wrote on June 12, 2014 at 7:06 am

It sounds like one more attempt by the city to get people to park in the parking garage.

highspeed wrote on June 12, 2014 at 8:06 am

Thats chump change compared  to what the UofI charges. 20.00 a ticket to paid within 72 hrs, if not it goes to 30.00. and no freebie!!

rsp wrote on June 12, 2014 at 9:06 am

When I see these kinds of things I always think "we really don't want you here". So I don't shop in those areas if I don't have to. Once they impliment the pay-by-phone system the only ones getting tickets will be those who haven't learned to game the system.

AreaMan wrote on June 12, 2014 at 10:06 am
Profile Picture

To me this is evidence that the editors live in a bubble. As long as you park legally, you'll never have any fine to pay anyway. I like the rule of the first ticket being dismissed, as this allows for one to learn the rules without being penalized. Since the ramping fine schedule applies to a rolling calendar year, this system does a good job of singling out repeat offenders, and gives them financial incentive to learn and abide by the law.

Since when is a $35 fine tantamount to a Class X Felony punishment? Give me a break.

Sancho Panza wrote on June 12, 2014 at 12:06 pm

The new ticket pricing structure seems fairer than the previous structure. The paying by cell phone diminishes issues where people have a lack of change at hand or some errand taking longer than expected. This fee structure is set up to punish the most egregious violators.  I suspect the average person comes out ahead, or only slightly more penalized.  Compared to the previous fines of $10 each, on average a person with one violation saves $10, a person with two violations saves $2.50 per offense, and a person with 3 violations will pay an additional $3.33 per offense.