Voices: '... When I must sleep with my Fathers'

Voices: '... When I must sleep with my Fathers'

By ROBERT MORRISON

On turning 60, George Washington wrote in letters to friends: "The time is not far distant when I must sleep with my Fathers."

When I was a history student reading those words, my professors told me that Washington lacked Thomas Jefferson's "peculiar felicity of expression." Even though I was studying at Jefferson's university, I found it hard not to feel the beauty of Washington's words.

"Sleeping with my Fathers" was Washington's poetic way of describing his own impending death. I read them rather more literally. They reminded me of my own father coming home day after day from his carpenter's job. He would sit with me in our family's TV room and tell me wonderful stories of his seagoing days. He had sailed to 47 countries before, during and after World War II, and he was a fount of knowledge about the wider world.

Sometimes, our story hour would turn into wrestling on the TV room floor. Pop would then tell me about the need to defend myself from neighborhood bullies and teach me some self-defense moves.

Not infrequently, we would fall asleep on that floor. We would only awaken when my mother would come in and yell, "Les, take a bath and come to supper." My father always smelled of sweat and sawdust. It was an honest, sweet scent.

Pop was proud of his work. He could drive nails faster and more accurately than any man I've ever known. And he often worked high atop construction sites, as sure-footed as a Mohawk. His hammer would tap out a steady rhythm: "pop, POP, pop." It was rare that a nail required more than three swings of his hammer.

Pop would only intervene in coming-of-age fights if the toughs ganged up on me or if one of them threatened me with a knife. Then, he would march over to the gang leader's house and tell his old man to come out. Pop would tell that father that if his son used a weapon or ganged up, he would "knock his block off." He never had to back up his words with his fists. In those happy days, even the toughs had fathers in the home.

It's painful for me to read every weekend the reports of murders in our inner cities. Emergency rooms in our major cities see too much of the "rod and gun club" casualties. More than two-thirds of the teen murderers in our prisons are fatherless young men.

Liberal politicians and press lords focus on race, poverty, education or other indicators, the so-called "root causes" of urban homicides. They want to target more federal programs to those mean streets. As if those streets don't have targets enough.

Rarely do the pols and pundits acknowledge fatherlessness. My blue-collar neighborhood was no garden. I often had to fight. But there was a limit to the violence. Fathers like mine enforced that limit.

There's another factor to consider when dealing with the sources of violence: religion. In their now classic study, "Who Escapes? The Relation of Church-Going and Other Background Factors to the Socio-Economic Performance of Black Male Youths from Inner-City Poverty Tracts," Richard B. Freeman and Harry J. Holzer showed how some young men avoided entrapment in a host of destructive behaviors and attitudes. Church-going was then seen (1985) as a protection for vulnerable youth.

The work of Family Research Council's Marriage and Religion Research Institute (marri.org) powerfully reinforces the Freeman and Holzer conclusions.

When I first read those words of Washington, that sweet reference to sleeping with his Fathers, my professors did not point out that those words were taken straight from scripture: "So David slept with his Fathers and was buried in the City of David" (1 Kings 2:10).

Washington's readers would instantly have recognized the reference. For some years, it eluded me. Did that Bible reference also escape my learned teachers?

We are coming to the point — and already might have passed it — when Americans will no longer recognize what it means to sleep, or to wake, with our fathers. As Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker acerbically writes, father may be the new F-word.

The French understand what is at issue in the new laws abolishing mother and father in their legal code.

"Everyone needs the love of a mother and a father," said a 10-year-old marcher in one of their recent, massive Paris street demonstrations. As if he had uttered an obscenity, the YouTube video of the boy's comments has since been removed.

Now that I have passed that meridian that Washington called "the grand climacteric," 60 years, I can affirm his words.

I can appreciate what it means to sleep with our Fathers. I'm grateful for my own father, and for our country's founding father. In speaking thus from scripture, Washington was a model father and protector, a good and wise grounding father.

Robert Morrison is a senior fellow at the Family Research Council.

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

wayward wrote on June 17, 2013 at 1:06 pm

The Southern Poverty Law Center has identified the Family Research Council as a hate group: http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups/family-research-council#.Ub9aThayPdk .  I know money is tight, but you might want to get a little pickier about guest commentators.

Sid Saltfork wrote on June 18, 2013 at 3:06 pm

The News Gazette has used articles from the Family Research Council before.  Comments were negative on the previous articles.  Evidently, the editorial staff of the News Gazette endorses the views of the Family Research Council since they run the articles habitually.

rsp wrote on June 22, 2013 at 9:06 am

One of the factors affecting the availability of the father to his children are the three strikes laws. There are men doing longer sentences for small amounts of drugs than if they had committed a murder. When their sons end up in prison, is it because they are bad people or because they are just trying to get to their dads?

alabaster jones 71 wrote on April 13, 2014 at 10:04 pm
Profile Picture

"Liberal politicians and press lords focus on race, poverty, education or other indicators, the so-called 'root causes' of urban homicides.....rarely do the pols and pundits acknowledge fatherlessness."

 

What a clown.  Fatherlessness certainly contributes to urban violence, but to suggest that it is the root cause instead of poverty--and lack of education and opportunity--is appallingly ignorant.