Guest Commentary: Illinois cannot avoid a tax hike

Guest Commentary: Illinois cannot avoid a tax hike


Given both the size and cause of the state's fiscal shortcomings, at this point in time the greatest good policymakers can deliver for the public is to raise taxes.

Here's why.

First, there's the sheer magnitude of the problem. At the end of FY2015 — the last year Illinois actually enacted a full budget — the accumulated General Fund deficit was $5.97 billion. That deficit ballooned to $9.5 billion in FY2016 — despite year-to-year spending cuts of $2.7 billion. Estimates are it will jump to $14.8 billion in the current fiscal year — FY2017 — which ends June 30.

If that happens, over 68 percent, or more than two-thirds, of FY2017 service expenditures will be deficit spending.

That's not good, given $9 out of every $10 of those service expenditures go to education, health care, social services and public safety. And no, the deficits weren't caused by high or profligate spending. Indeed, Illinois ranked just 31st nationally in service spending per capita (39th in spending as a share of state GDP), while having the fifth largest population and economy in the wealthiest nation in the world.

Hence, despite its large relative wealth and population, Illinois' huge deficits mean it can't afford to rank in the bottom third in funding those four core services.

So if not spending, what's really driving the untenable growth in Illinois' deficit over time? Well, all the data show the primary culprit is state tax policy that's so flawed, it doesn't generate enough revenue growth to continue funding the same level of services over time, adjusting solely for inflation and population changes, even during periods of normal economic growth. That's a textbook "structural deficit."

The only sustainable way to eliminate a structural deficit caused by poor revenue growth resulting from flawed tax policy is to — you guessed it — raise revenue production by reforming tax policy.

The bad news is the longer politicians dither, the more expensive the tax increase has to be. Currently, the state needs to generate around $7 billion to $7.5 billion in new annual revenue, to eliminate the structural deficit over time and fund services adequately into the future.

Now, that sounds like a lot, but in context of Illinois' annual state GDP of over $777 billion, it really isn't. Indeed, it amounts to taking slightly less than 1 percent of the state's economic activity.

So what tax reforms are needed? First, Illinois has to increase its personal income tax rate to 5.3 percent — a relatively modest change from the current 3.75 percent. This goes a long way toward stabilizing the state's finances, by generating roughly $5.1 billion in additional annual revenue.

Moving to a graduated rate structure would be better — as in fairer — tax policy, but the Illinois Constitution doesn't allow it. Still, some tax fairness can be gained by increasing the Illinois Earned Income Tax Credit, which targets tax relief to low- and middle-income folks.

Next, Illinois should bump the corporate income tax rate from 5.25 percent to 6 percent, while eliminating tax expenditures that don't generate a public good. This raises over $740 million more annually.

Finally, Illinois must expand its sales tax base to include the same consumer services taxed in Iowa and Wisconsin. The "base" of a sales tax is simply those items and services the tax applies to when sold. Currently, Illinois taxes less of the modern economy than any other state with a sales tax, because it misses most consumer services. This expansion would solve that problem and generate $2 billion in annual revenue.

The kicker: Illinois would remain relatively low tax after implementing all these increases, ranking in the bottom half nationally in total state and local tax burden as a percentage of income.

Hey, life would be great if doing the right thing was always easy and popular. Experience, however, teaches us that it's frequently neither. And while raising taxes isn't politically popular or easy, it's clearly the right thing to do.

Ralph Martire is executive director of the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability, a bipartisan fiscal policy think tank.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Save the Farms wrote on May 30, 2017 at 9:05 pm

Illinois does need a tax increase, but we desperately need to do something about K-12 and Higher Education funding.

Property taxes, funding a large and largely immune part of our budget, keep trying to go "up."  The lionshare of these go to K-12 education (of which I am a great supporter).  However, costs go up while enrollment goes down.  I've watched Chicago teachers go on strike and successfully get more money, and quite a lot of money, for salaries and pensions, while everything else in this state suffers.

Higher Education funding (of which I am a greater supporter with a vested interest) has gone down 53% in the latest lists comparing states.  This is atrocious.  Half of all the expected decline in enrollment, because of demographic changes, for the entire country, has been absorbed by Illinois.

Something is wrong here...the wrong is the K-12 funding that is immune to reality, while Higher Education takes all the hits.  This becomes even worse when one compares rich districts ($28,639/student) to poor ($9,794/student)  - the poor K-12 districts are suffering while the rich one relish their luck.

New Jersey, the one state with a higher pension debt than Illinois. is also #1 in property taxes.  Illinois is #2 in property taxes and #2 in pension debt.  This suggest both New Jersey and Illinois are doing it wrong by relying so much on property taxes. 

Illinois does have a Madigan Vs. Rauner issue, but it also has a huge issue in how the state funds education.