Tate: Tepper and giving up TDs

Tate: Tepper and giving up TDs

There are times when it was beneficial for a football team to allow a touchdown in order to have a better chance to win. That was the case Sunday when Bill Belechick played the odds against the Giants, allowing New York to score and thereby giving Tom Brady 50-plus seconds to reverse a 21-17 deficit. As we’ve seen, dozens and dozens of NFL games have been won with marches in the final minute. In this case, New England failed.

If Belechick had let the clock run down, the Giants would have been able to win the game with a field goal from roughly extra point range where NFL teams have better than a 95-percent success rate. Several NFL kickers have consecutive streaks in excess of 200.

 The Lou Tepper decision in 1996 at Minnesota was much more controversial. With Illinois ahead 21-17 and the clock under a minute, the Gophers had first down on the UI 6-inch line. A touchdown seemed inevitable, so Tepper chose to allow the TD in order for Illinois to have 46 seconds to counter with a field goal.

Illini players on the field weren’t happy. They wanted the opportunity to stop Minnesota on the goal line. It’s doubtful they would have been able to do so. So Tepper chose to gamble, and the Illini lost 23-21 when they failed to reach field goal range.

Another case involving this manner of strategy came in 1999 at Michigan when the Illini scored four consecutive second-half touchdowns to go ahead 35-27. But they didn’t need Rocky Harvey’s final 54-yard score. Ahead 28-27, all Illinois needed was a first down to run out the final minute. When Harvey went the distance, the Wolverines remained within eight points of a tie, and Tom Brady led them to the UI 16 where his pass was intercepted and fumbled into the end zone where Illini Muhammad Abdullah recovered for a safety.

Categories (3):Illini Sports, Football, Sports

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
calvin wrote on February 08, 2012 at 1:02 pm

still my favorite game of all time

peterborich wrote on February 08, 2012 at 2:02 pm

GIven Loren's recent Pollyanna comments on the basketball program, I would imagine he is outright bitter about the ousting of Lou Tepper as head coach of the football team.  Seems to me I remember a Tate article in the mid-90s expressing outrage at Illinois fans for being upset about a rancid Illini offensive unit after an embarassing 7-0 home win against East Carolina.   The fans knew then that massive offensive struggles against East Carolina was a sign of bad things to come, just as the fans today know that losing year-after-year to undermanned Penn State squads, losing at home to Northwestern and looking bad doing it, and sporting a .500 Big Ten ledger during the past five years, means it is time for changes in the basketball program.   

But, alas, Stupid Illini fans, they don't know nuttin'  .  . . . .  .

cdyson wrote on February 08, 2012 at 2:02 pm

Have to be honest with you peterborich, your response to this article makes you look dumb. The article is simply about football and the strategy of letting a team score a touchdown. If the guy wants to right an article about football then why are you talking about basketball? Go complain about it on another article....

peterborich wrote on February 08, 2012 at 3:02 pm

You are right . . especially because I won't have to wait long for that other article . .

cdyson wrote on February 09, 2012 at 12:02 pm

That is very true!! 

blmillini wrote on February 09, 2012 at 9:02 am

Probably not the best idea to tell someone their post makes them look dumb and then go on to spell "write", "right".

cdyson wrote on February 09, 2012 at 12:02 pm

Very true blmillini...very true...I am at shock I did that, but it is sort of ironic...after writing my response!