Go West, Illini

No more “Legends.” And no more “Leaders.”

The Big Ten is giving them the boot and following a more traditional route for its division names.

The conference is going with “East” and “West” instead and switching to a nine-game scheduling format after presidents and chancellors approved the moves on Sunday.

The new division alignments will begin in 2014 when Rutgers and Maryland join the conference, meaning “Legends” and “Leaders” will be a thing of the past.  That will probably come as good news for fans who have criticized those names ever since the league unveiled them in 2010. To many, they were confusing and didn’t help identify where teams play, but that won’t be an issue any more.

Besides the new division alignment, teams will go from playing eight conference games to nine in 2016.

“Big Ten directors of athletics concluded four months of study and deliberation with unanimous approval of a future football structure that preserved rivalries and created divisions based on their primary principle of East/West geography,” commissioner Jim Delany said in a statement.  “The directors of athletics also relied on the results of a fan survey commissioned by BTN last December to arrive at their recommendation, which is consistent with the public sentiment expressed in the poll.”

Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State, Penn State and Rutgers will be in the East division. The West will consist of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, Northwestern, Purdue and Wisconsin.

School will play six division games plus two against teams from the other division in 2014 and 2015. In 2016, they’ll play three cross-division games.

Indiana and Purdue will meet on an annual basis.

East division teams will host five conference games during even-numbered years starting in 2016, with West teams hosting five in odd-numbered seasons. Under that format, teams will be guaranteed to play each other at least once every four years.

“Big Ten directors of athletics met in person or by conference call six times from December to March to discuss a new Big Ten football model,” Delany said.  “The level of cooperation and collaboration was reflective of what we’ve come to expect from this group of administrators who have worked extremely well together on a number of complex matters over the past several years.  We are all looking forward to ushering in this new era of Big Ten football.”

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

teachdacc wrote on April 28, 2013 at 3:04 pm

A great plan that should have been implemented even without adding Rutgers and Maryland!  

blmillini wrote on April 28, 2013 at 3:04 pm

Illini lucky to be in the weak division.

illini82 wrote on April 28, 2013 at 8:04 pm

Adding Rutgers and Maryland does nothing for the fans. 

 

From a football standpoint Penn St. (pre-Sandusky) and Nebraska had strong national brand names but even then many a fan lamented losing the prospect of playing Michigan and OSU at home every other year. Nebraska is the only historical program in the west but that could work to our favor as Wisconsin losing their coach and Iowa struggling a bit could be our opportunity in a few years....once we get a new or better said once we get a REAL FB coach.

Still...not seeing PSU, OSU and Michigan leaves one with an empty feeling. Sure we'll see them every 4 years but it's a hollow consolation.

That said there might as well be a full court press for Texas and Notre Dame. At least let's add some names.

jgrout wrote on April 29, 2013 at 2:04 pm

UT-Austin ruins any conference it touches.