Tate: UI hoops seeks winning formula

In late February of 2011, UConn hit an unexpected swoon, losing four of five basketball games to Louisville, Marquette, West Virginia and Notre Dame.

That's when Jim Calhoun righted the ship, and the Huskies went on an 11-game binge, upending Kentucky in the NCAA semifinal 56-55 and manhandling Butler in the windup 53-41.

And when Calhoun stepped down at age 70 last week, it occurred that only one other basketball coach in this era, Duke's Mike Krzyzewski, was more accomplished in building from scratch.

Calhoun brought alive sleepy Storrs, a rural community with fewer residents than the school enrollment (17,000-plus). Between 1971 and 1989, UConn didn't have so much as a conference championship. It was a good regional operation, but not flashy at tourney time. Calhoun single-handedly uplifted it to the national stage. They made the NCAA field 18 times, and his three national titles came with entirely different rosters.

Others have risen to the top, often riding the coattails of some powerful and persuasive master recruiter in the past. After Adolph Rupp at Kentucky, the Commonwealth faithful wouldn't stand long for a successor producing mediocrity. If they are disrupted by infractions, it is a momentary thing.

North Carolina is still riding the wave created by Dean Smith. Kansas has developed the same mystique.

These elite schools have become as attractive to 18-year-old jump shooters as Harvard and Princeton are to budding young lawyers. The top athletes keep pouring in.

Recent success

Illinois, with only one NCAA victory in the last six years (UNLV in 2011), might have maintained this elite status but for frequent snags.

Actually, as athletic director Mike Thomas pointed out at Friday's sparsely attended basketball reunion, the UI still ranks high on the historic scale.

Hark back. From 1935 and 1937, when Harry Combes sparked Big Ten titles, until Combes' 1957 team was fouled by the midseason ineligibility of center George BonSalle, the Illini spent two decades as a respected Top 10 program. The Whiz Kids were terrific, and Combes quickly put three teams in the Final Four after replacing Doug Mills.

Quality teams appeared again under Lou Henson in the 1980s, and for brief periods under Bill Self and Bruce Weber.

Consider: Thomas read from a sheet that showed Illinois ranked No. 5 in Forbes' 2011 list of most valuable programs, No. 6 in ESPN/Sagarin rankings, No. 9 in weeks ranked in the AP poll (434), and No. 11 in NCAA tourney appearances (29).

In the Big Ten, Illinois ranks No. 1 in conference wins and conference tournament wins, No. 3 in conference win percentage (57.8), and No. 4 in conference titles (17).

As tradition goes, this is pretty good. But here comes another crossroads. John Groce is inheriting a second-division squad. He'll be asked to buck a conference that preseason rankings may put tops in the country. Indiana is back, and Michigan is making waves. Michigan State and Ohio State are entrenched. It is a loaded lineup with good teams like Wisconsin, Minnesota and Purdue fighting for their lives.

Having lost then-sophomore Meyers Leonard to the NBA, and starting out without a scholarship freshman, Groce picked off two transfers and appears to be lining up quality recruits for the November signing period. He gets an A for his early performance. Then come the games.

Looking back

However competitive it was in a day when Illinois nibbled at the golden apple, it is much more competitive now. And Illinois finds itself restarting its engines after another in a long series of mistakes and setbacks.

(1) For decades in the past, Illini coaches elected to concentrate on in-state talent to the exclusion of outlying areas. That worked for years but is an unsound policy in the modern game. No top teams recruit exclusively in the home state, and Groce is working to change the Illini image.

(2) Just as black athletes were becoming dominant in the 1960s, some universities took steps to establish special programs to meet the academic needs of minorities. The UI was slow to respond. Cincinnati, Michigan and others took advantage when would-be Illini stars had problems with enrollment and/or classes.

(3) When Chicago's best big men — Crane's Tim Robinson, Dunbar's Bernie Mills — were rejected or found unqualified, when the UI's first black cager, Walt Moore, flunked out, the word spread back to the high schools. The UI was seen as "not taking care of our athletes." Great stars like Cazzie Russell, George Wilson and Jim Brewer found it beneficial to go elsewhere.

(4) The "slush fund" in 1966-67 damaged the program and the school image. Standouts Rich Jones, Ron Dunlap and Steve Kuberski were suspended and the program suffered. A few years later, Harv Schmidt's operation was chilled by the early departures of Billy Morris, Chris Berymon and Alvin O'Neal. And a long fuss with the NCAA over Deon Thomas crippled the Henson regime around 1990.

(5) As strong as Henson's teams were in the 1980s, the UI went through 45 years, from 1953 through 1997, with just two shared Big Ten titles.

(6) Illinois has been bad and unlucky in NCAA play, losing 12 tournament games by three points or less, and going decades without defeating a higher seed. Some of these critical games twisted at the end like a Cardinal ninth inning. The Illini do not have a good reputation for clutch play in the tournament.

(7) Schools like Ohio State, Iowa and Michigan State faced no barriers in tearing down fieldhouses and building glistening new arenas, while the Illini are obliged to stay with an Assembly Hall that is untouchable. Even if $150 million is poured into renovation, the building was not constructed for ideal basketball viewing.

(8) The UI has frowned on and avoided the admittedly ridiculous salaries given top coaches elsewhere. That killed any chance of retaining the one coach — Bill Self — who had the flair and salesmanship to attract elite athletes at the national level. When you get really good these days, there's a $2 million contract waiting somewhere.

For all of us, what we are today is a result of what we were all along. Illini basketball has had a lot of stumbles.

EDITOR'S NOTE: A similar study of Illini football will follow in a few days.

Loren Tate writes for The News-Gazette. He can be reached at ltate@news-gazette.com.

Comments

News-Gazette.com embraces discussion of both community and world issues. We welcome you to contribute your ideas, opinions and comments, but we ask that you avoid personal attacks, vulgarity and hate speech. We reserve the right to remove any comment at our discretion, and we will block repeat offenders' accounts. To post comments, you must first be a registered user, and your username will appear with any comment you post. Happy posting.

Login or register to post comments

illini82 wrote on September 17, 2012 at 8:09 am

 Loren, you didn't point out the failure of the Weber regime to take advantage of Illinois' greatest basketball triumph to date. A national championship game appearance in the Final Four. Yet for all the hype created by that magical year Weber was unable to translate that success to the recruiting trail. The beginning of the end was the Eric Gordon fiasco and his infamous rejection of Illinois at the last minute to instead attend Indiana. It wasn't so much the loss of Gordon, which was bad enough but the negative national perception that Weber and the program suffered after such a public rejection. Weber already had a reputation of being unable to recruit elite talent. The Gordon incident just fed those flames even more.  In the end that incident forever tipped the scales against Weber.


You also point out in your column that Guenther was unable or perhaps more truthfully unwilling to do what was necessary to retain Bill Self. Basically RG was unwilling to pay more money to try to keep Self. We readers have been told over the years that no amount of money could have kept self from his so-called dream job at an elite blue-blood program llike Kansas. But did RG even try to pursuade him to stay (with money and other perks) or did he instead blow-up at Self for being dis-loyal at their last meeting that Saturday before he resigned? It seems doubtful Self could have been retained but Self himself said he was very torn and it wasn't a given to take the job at KU. It would be nice to know what really happened at that last meeting between Guenther and Self. It's all history now but it seems this was just another incident in a list of questionable decisions or actions that RG made over his tenure that had negative implications for the major revenue sports at Illinois.

TheGallopingGhost77 wrote on September 17, 2012 at 9:09 am

"Yet for all the hype created by that magical year Weber was unable to translate that success to the recruiting trail."

You must have forgotten about the pact Bruce Weber made with the Devil during the semi-final game against Arizona.  The deal was that for the Illini to win, Weber wouldn't be able to recruit another good player for the next 5 years. 

blmillini wrote on September 17, 2012 at 10:09 am

RG was the poster boy for operating on the cheap.  He did not understand that majore NCAA sports is big money and you have to spend money to make money.  I don't know about those before him but he was obviously marketing challenged.  It is nice to see that we have a guy that seems to "get it" now.  I wish old man Tate would acknowledge both or retire.

Matt wrote on September 17, 2012 at 2:09 pm

Its funny how guys like you don't want to give Guenther any credit for hiring Krueger and Self which by all accounts were home run hires. Like Weber or not he was the right guy to get us to the championship game.


The Big Ten is one of the top 3 Bball conferences in the country every year and many times it's #1. As Mr. Tate always says..."everybody wants to win"....but it's not easy or guaranteed.


I hope everyone realizes Guenther was directly responsible for the Golden Era of Illini hoops. I hate to be a downer but it's unlikely Groce will amass as many Conf Titles, Tourney wins or evern one FF app during his tenure. Groce has my full support and I like him. Just pointing out some realities to the complainers.


Go to games. Support the team. Quit complaining.


 

calvin wrote on September 17, 2012 at 10:09 am

Many of these Illini basketball articles overlook the influence Lon Kruger had during his brief stay.  He re-established state-wide recruiting and brought in many, many high quality players.  He was given a five year contract at a million per with a ten million signing bonus.   Who wouldn't have jumped at it back then(or even now)? Compare theplayers on campus when he left with the team we have now.

OKOMIS wrote on September 17, 2012 at 4:09 pm

Funny you should mention Krueger.. RG got him from (up to that point) a joke of a basketball program… Their AD got a coach (Donavan) and was able to keep him.. from the pro’s (Magic) and Blue Blood programs (Kentucky) so RG was OK at bringing in coaches from FAR less attractive (again at the time) programs… he just couldn’t keep them… you can sugar coat it anyway you want… but in the end RG was NOT a very good AD… and Weber was  not a good hire!!

DaisyJ wrote on September 17, 2012 at 7:09 pm

Do not fall for the we need Chicago, we need black super stars. Give me a kid with


talent,( not just a dunk shot)  of any color. Give me a regular star, not a rented for a


year kid.  Head cases most of them. Pampered by AAU and others can go to the schools that want them. Not for me. Not needed. Look at Butler. Look at Davidson. Get a worthy kid that is teachable


and things will be fine.


So when are we going to stop the football nonsense. Are we happy with the banging of helmets and


the tossing back and forth of our young kids brains. Are we. Is it worth the entertainment to keep


allowing it to go on. Think about it.