State Rep. Justin Slaughter, D-Chicago, third from left in black mask, celebrates with lawmakers and staff after the Illinois House passed the criminal-justice reform bill he sponsored during its lame-duck session Wednesday morning at the Bank of Springfield Center.

SPRINGFIELD — The criminal-justice omnibus bill that passed the Illinois General Assembly this week drew praise from the one person who still needs to sign it before it becomes law — Gov. J.B. Pritzker.

“This criminal-justice package carries with it the opportunity to shape our state into a lesson in true justice for the nation by abolishing cash bail, modernizing sentencing laws, instituting a certification and decertification system for police officers statewide, requiring body cameras, reforming crowd-control response and amplifying law-enforcement training standards,” he said.

“I was proud to make ending cash bail and modernizing sentencing laws a legislative priority of my administration, and I have long pledged my support to the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus in their efforts to pass not just criminal-justice reform and police accountability measures, but also to truly root out the systemic racism that pulses through all our nation’s institutions by pursuing greater equity in health care, higher goals in education and deeper investments in economic opportunity for communities that have for too long been left out and left behind.”

The legislation, an initiative of the Black caucus, was tied to a new amendment to House Bill 3653, introduced in the early- morning hours Wednesday following mostly private negotiations that stripped down many controversial provisions.

“Abraham Lincoln once said, ‘Plant your feet in the right place and stand firm.’ We are standing firm,” said state Sen. Elgie Sims, D-Chicago, who sponsored the bill. “We are fundamentally changing the way we do criminal justice in this state.”

Many of the most debated aspects — such as ending qualified immunity for law enforcement — were reduced or removed following heavy opposition from law enforcement, labor unions, prosecutors and municipal representatives.

Still, the scaled-down version that made it to the Senate floor was criticized by Republican lawmakers who said its changes were too drastic and would negatively affect the safety of Illinois communities.

A look at some provisions:

Pretrial detention

Effective Jan. 1, 2023, all bail bonds and conditions of bail will be replaced by a system of pretrial release to be developed by the Illinois courts based on a detainee’s alleged crime, their risk of not appearing for their court date and the threat or danger they may pose to the community if released.

“For too long, people in this state have spent time in jail only because they could not afford to pay their bail,” said state Sen. Robert Peters, D-Chicago. “The end of that practice is near. I’m thrilled that ending cash bail was part of the package we passed today.”

The original version of the bill abolished cash bail effective immediately, but that was extended by two years to accommodate the transition and allow for uniform standards to be developed, according to Sims.

Police use of force

According to the bill, the General Assembly intends to establish statewide use-of-force standards by 2022 while making changes to what are acceptable and unacceptable practices in state statutes.

The bill provides that use of force is permissible only when an officer has determined it is necessary to defend either themselves or others from bodily harm when making an arrest. When a suspect is attempting to escape, officers would not be permitted to use deadly force to stop them unless that person cannot be apprehended at a later date and is likely to harm others.

The law prohibits certain tactics. Chokeholds and restraints above the shoulders that can restrict breathing are banned, unless explicitly used as deadly force. It also prohibits using force as a punishment or in retaliation when it is not authorized; using non-lethal projectiles, like Tasers and rubber bullets, on someone’s head, groin area or back; firing any type of bullet into a crowd; and using tear gas and pepper spray without first allowing a crowd to disperse after being warned.

Before officers can use deadly force, they must make a reasonable effort to identify themselves and warn that they are about to use deadly force.

Officers can no longer use deadly force against someone for committing a property crime, unless that crime is tied to terrorism or to another crime or action where deadly force is permitted.

Officers are also restricted from using deadly force against a person who poses a danger to themselves but does not pose an imminent threat to the officer or another person.

The police-reform provisions also add two new duties officers must follow. The first requires law enforcement to give immediate medical assistance to an injured person, regardless of whether they were injured by the officer’s use of force. The second is the duty to intervene when another officer uses excessive force and file a report of that incident within five days.

Qualified immunity

One of the largest changes to the bill was the gutting of a provision that would have ended qualified immunity for officers, allowing them to be sued for violating rights guaranteed in the Illinois Constitution.

Instead, the bill creates a yearlong Task Force on Constitutional Rights and Remedies, an 18-member body that will investigate and develop procedures to protect rights. It will specifically look at qualified immunity for law enforcement.

A report with policy recommendations must be submitted to the governor’s office and the General Assembly by May, with the task force being dissolved at the start of the new year.

Police certificationA police-certification provision backed by the attorney general’s office was also added to the bill. It gives the state more power over who can be a member of law enforcement and makes it easier to decertify and terminate the employment of problematic officers.

Before this legislation, the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board could decertify an officer only if they were convicted of a felony or a limited set of misdemeanors such as offering a bribe, prostitution or criminal sex abuse.

The criminal justice omnibus bill grants the standards board greater discretion to decertify officers based on whether a Certification Review Board determines they violated conduct guidelines.

An officer could be decertified if it is determined they committed a felony or a disqualifying misdemeanor, even if they were never convicted or charged. Other actions that could result in an officer being decertified include using excessive force; failing to intervene when another officer uses excessive force; tampering with dashboard cameras, body cameras or evidence; and committing perjury or engaging in “unprofessional conduct,” such as deceiving or harming the public.

Under a new statute of Law Enforcement Compliance Verification, all officers must verify their certification with the standards board every three years to prove they have completed all mandatory training and have not engaged in misconduct worthy of decertification.

No law-enforcement agency can hire a person who is not certified by the standards board.

The certification also overhauls transparency and communication in the criminal-justice system, creating three databases maintained by the standards board relating to officers.

The first, which will be private, will have every law-enforcement officer’s certification status, instances of misconduct and current or past status of employment in law-enforcement agencies. It will be available to the Illinois State Police, governmental agencies, law-enforcement agencies, state’s attorneys and the attorney general. All law-enforcement agencies would be required to use and check this database when hiring an officer.

Two other public databases would also be maintained by the standards board: One that contains all officers, their agency, certification status and any misconduct that led to decertification; and one that contains all completed investigations of law-enforcement misconduct, with the identifying information of the officers involved redacted.

Body camerasUnder the new bill, the Law Enforcement Officer-Worn Body Camera Act is amended so that all law-enforcement agencies must eventually use body cameras.

The largest agencies must have body cameras in place by 2022, while all agencies, no matter how small, must have body cameras implemented by 2025.

Originally, this provision was touted as the “defund the police” bill by law-enforcement groups opposing the legislation due to a non-compliance penalty that reduced how much state funding municipalities received for each year law-enforcement agencies under their control violated the mandate.

Now, compliance is rewarded and the penalty has been removed, with the standards board giving preference in grant funding to agencies following the mandate.

Detainee rightsThe bill expands rights of people who are taken into custody by police. The state’s 1963 Code of Criminal Procedure was amended and modernized regarding phone calls.

Suspects in custody must be able to make three phone calls within three hours of being taken into police custody. Every time they are detained in a new location, this right is renewed for the purpose of speaking to their attorney and notifying family and friends of their situation.

The new provision also gives detainees the right to access the contact list on their cellphone to obtain numbers as part of their three phone calls, even if the cellphone is being used as evidence in a criminal investigation. This must be done before the phone is officially placed into police inventory.

Other provisions give judges more discretion to disregard mandatory minimum sentences for certain crimes, change how prisoners are counted when drawing representative district maps and create a new process for how deaths in custody are handled.